The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.50

215.50 Custody of securities purchased; income.—

(1) All securities purchased or held may, with the approval of the board, be in the custody of the Chief Financial Officer or the Chief Financial Officer as treasurer ex officio of the board, or be deposited with a bank or trust company to be held in safekeeping by such bank or trust company for the collection of principal and interest or of the proceeds of the sale thereof.

(2) It shall be the duty of the board or of the Chief Financial Officer, as custodian of the securities of the board, to collect the interest or other income on, and the principal of, such securities in their custody as the sums become due and payable and to pay the same, when so collected, into the investment account of the fund to which the investments belong.

(3) The Chief Financial Officer, as custodian of securities owned by the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund and the Florida Survivor Benefit Trust Fund, shall collect the interest, dividends, prepayments, maturities, proceeds from sales, and other income accruing from such assets. As such income is collected by the Chief Financial Officer, it shall be deposited directly into a commercial bank to the credit of the State Board of Administration. Such bank accounts as may be required for this purpose shall offer satisfactory collateral security as provided by chapter 280. In the event funds so deposited according to the provisions of this section are required for the purpose of paying benefits or other operational needs, the State Board of Administration shall remit to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund in the State Treasury such amounts as may be requested by the Department of Management Services.

(4) Securities that the board selects to use for options operations under s. 215.45 or for lending under s. 215.47(17) shall be registered by the Chief Financial Officer in the name of a third-party nominee in order to facilitate such operations.

History.—s. 8, ch. 57-353; s. 5, ch. 67-354; s. 6, ch. 80-242; s. 2, ch. 80-317; s. 8, ch. 81-285; s. 4, ch. 82-45; s. 1, ch. 83-60; s. 79, ch. 83-217; s. 4, ch. 98-47; s. 72, ch. 99-255; s. 218, ch. 2003-261; s. 16, ch. 2009-21.

F.S. 215.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WILLIAMS, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY,, 284 F. Supp. 3d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . PENAL LAW § 215.50 -3, for violating the order of protection. . . . PENAL LAW 215.50 -3. . . . Cty. of Suffolk , 709 F.Supp.2d 188, 198 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing PENAL LAW 215.50 -3; People v. . . . Ct. 1999) ("To establish the crime of criminal contempt in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 215.50 . . . PENAL LAW 215.50 -3. . . .

VEGA, v. T. SCHNEIDERMAN,, 861 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50, violation of the order of protection would require the state to establish “intentional . . .

PHAM, v. M. KIRKPATRICK,, 209 F. Supp. 3d 497 (N.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Degree (Penal Law § 215.10(a)), and two counts of Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree (Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

MORRIS, v. SILVESTRE, III,, 604 F. App'x 22 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Kristyn Graziano on December 28, 2009 for Criminal Contempt, in violation of New York Penal Law section 215.50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHATMAN,, 581 F. App'x 90 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . that Chatman committed criminal contempt in the second degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

TEICHMANN, v. NEW YORK,, 769 F.3d 821 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . of New York Penal Law § 130.50(1), and of twenty-two counts of criminal contempt, in violation of § 215.50 . . .

HUDSON, v. COUNTY OF DUTCHESS, J., 51 F. Supp. 3d 357 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . accusing Plaintiff of criminal contempt in the second degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . . Penal Law § 140.05 (McKinney 2014). .Section 215.50 provides in relevant part that “[a] person is guilty . . . Penal Law § 215.50 (McKinney 2014). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRAVES,, 466 F. App'x 56 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50(3); People v. Inserra, 4 N.Y.3d 30, 32, 790 N.Y.S.2d 72, 823 N.E.2d 437 (2004). . . .

SANKAR, v. CITY OF NEW YORK Lt. O, 867 F. Supp. 2d 297 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 215.50(3)). . . .

S. ROBINS, v. GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, d b a, 838 F. Supp. 2d 631 (N.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . for twelve months at a rate of $50/session, adding up (with taxes) to a recurring monthly payment of $215.50 . . . CONTAINS ANY BLANK SPACES,” and (2) in the space authorizing her bank/credit card company to make the $215.50 . . .

JEAN- LAURENT, v. P. O. HENNESSY P. O. O, 840 F. Supp. 2d 529 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . because he was convicted of criminal contempt in the second degree under New York Penal Law Section 215.50 . . .

NNEBE, v. DAUS,, 644 F.3d 147 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Tampering With a Juror (1st)— Class A Misdemeanor 215.45 Compounding a Crime — Class A Misdemeanor 215.50 . . .

ARREDONDO, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 623 F.3d 1317 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . been convicted of petty theft in Idaho in April 1997, and served 64 days in jail and paid a fine of $215.50 . . .

R. CARTHEW, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,, 709 F. Supp. 2d 188 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 215.50(3); see also People v. . . . N.Y.Crim.Ct.1999) (“To establish the crime of criminal contempt in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

PACE, v. TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, P., 678 F. Supp. 2d 79 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50, or harassment in the second degree, N.Y. Penal Law § 240.26. . . . Penal Law § 215.50. . . .

DROZ, v. P. J. McCADDEN, B. C. G., 580 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 215.50(1) for “disorderly, contemptuous or insolent behavior, committed during the sitting of a court . . .

SEARLES, v. POMPILIO, 652 F. Supp. 2d 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50 (McKinney 2001). {See Randazzo Deck, Ex. . . . Penal Law § 215.50)) d.Resisting Arrest Under New York law, “a person is guilty of resisting arrest when . . .

HOODHO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 558 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . Hoodho was convicted of violating section 215.50(3) of the New York Penal Law, which prohibits “intentional . . . 607 (1990), govern the application of INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(ii) to his prior conviction under section 215.50 . . . Even so, the record does not show, as Hoodho now contends, that he was convicted under Section 215.50 . . . As explained above, the record of Hoodho’s conviction for violating Section 215.50(3) of the New York . . . As Hoodho concedes that the modified categorical approach is applicable to Section 215.50(3) of the New . . .

RHEINGOLD, v. HARRISON TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. a k a, 568 F. Supp. 2d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . warrant arresting plaintiff for criminal contempt in the second degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . . Penal Law 215.50(3); Holtzman v. Beatty, 97 A.D.2d 79, 82, 468 N.Y.S.2d 905 (2d Dep’t 1983). . . . Court, Criminal Part, the charge of criminal contempt in the second degree under New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. SUPERINTENDENT, COLLINS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,, 549 F. Supp. 2d 226 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50(3)). Petitioner was represented at trial by Assistant Public Defender Gas-par M. . . .

WATCHER, v. POTTSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., 559 F. Supp. 2d 516 (M.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . Unsuccessful Post-Trial Work Of the forty-eight thousand, two hundred fifteen dollars and fifty cents ($48,-215.50 . . .

DROZ, v. ESTATE OF ANDERSON P. J., 529 F. Supp. 2d 368 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . They agreed upon subsection 215.50(1). . . . Penal Law § 215.50(1). . . .

GAMS, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION,, 232 F.R.D. 202 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 215.50), both misdemeanors, in the Justice Court of the Village of Mount Kisco on the theory that . . .

DRAKOULIS, v. ASHCROFT,, 356 F. Supp. 2d 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 215.50. . . .

COYLE, v. COYLE,, 354 F. Supp. 2d 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Plaintiff was subsequently arrested and was charged with violating New York State Penal Law Section 215.50 . . .

COYLE, v. COYLE,, 302 F. Supp. 2d 3 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Shortly thereafter, Coyle was arrested and charged with violating New York State Penal Law Section 215.50 . . .

BULLARD Jo v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 240 F. Supp. 2d 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 215.50). (Id.) . . . Penal L. § 215.50); and harassment in the second degree (N.Y. . . .

SANCHEZ, v. DUNCAN,, 282 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50[3]. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MORALES,, 239 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 215.50 (second-degree criminal contempt); “resisting arrest,” see id. § 205.30 (resisting arrest) . . .

McHUGH, v. RUBIN,, 220 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . Penal Law §§ 215.50 and 120.00, respectively, after he violated an order of protection and struck his . . .

TUCKER, v. P. O. GROSS, No. P. O. No. P. O. No. P. O., 39 F. Supp. 2d 244 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . Degree (New York Penal Law § 140.25) and Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree (New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

MERCADO, v. STINSON,, 37 F. Supp. 2d 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50(4). . . .

BRADY, v. D. MARKS,, 7 F. Supp. 2d 247 (W.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . Plaintiff alleges that he was charged with violations of Penal Law 215.50(3), Criminal Contempt in the . . .

TUCKER, v. KENNEY, P. O. No. P. O. No. P. O. No. P. O., 994 F. Supp. 412 (E.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . Degree (New York Penal Law § 140.25) and Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree (New York Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

DELANCETT, v. VILLAGE OF SARANAC LAKE G. DELANCETT, v. FARMER,, 986 F. Supp. 126 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Penal Law § 215.50(3) McKinney 1988). . . .

MIGIS, v. PEARLE VISION, INC., 944 F. Supp. 508 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . A process server charged a total of $215.50 to serve four witnesses with trial subpoenas on June 13, . . .

BRAWER, v. CARTER, III,, 937 F. Supp. 1071 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . intentionally violated a court order, as required by the criminal contempt statute, N.Y.Penal Law § 215.50 . . . New York Penal Law section 215.50(3) defines criminal contempt in the second degree as “[ijntentional . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 215.50(3) (McKinney 1988). . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 215.50(3) (McKinney 1988). . . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 10(6) (McKinney 1987); N.Y.Penal Law § 215.50(3) (McKinney 1988); N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law . . .

In RICHARDSON, OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, v. RICHARDSON,, 193 B.R. 378 (D.D.C. 1995)

. . . $57,451.95 ($58,315.83 less the $863.88 remaining in the account) plus interest, for a total of $59,-215.50 . . .

HALDERMAN, v. PENNHURST STATE SCHOOL HOSP., 899 F. Supp. 209 (E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . Ferleger should be reimbursed for 215.50 hours from the Commonwealth, thirty-nine (39) of which were . . .

A. KESSNER, v. DUPRAS,, 826 F. Supp. 657 (W.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . imprisonment for up to 30 days for criminal contempt of court, or, after prosecution under Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

DUKES, v. STATE OF NEW YORK,, 743 F. Supp. 1037 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . § 120.00 and (4) criminal contempt in the second degree in violation of New York State Penal Law § 215.50 . . .

PRYOR, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 704 F. Supp. 35 (E.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . . § 215.50. . . . Section 215.50(3) provides that A person is guilty of criminal contempt in the second degree when he . . .

BARR, v. ABRAMS, J. A. O, 810 F.2d 358 (2d Cir. 1987)

. . . General Tepper filed a criminal information charging Barr with criminal contempt in violation of Section 215.50 . . . The contempt information was founded on § 215.50(3) of the New York Penal Law, which authorizes prosecution . . .

BARR, v. ABRAMS, J. A. O, 641 F. Supp. 547 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . The contempt information was founded on § 215.50(3) of the New York Penal Law, which authorizes prosecution . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, 611 F. Supp. 1296 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . Finger, Brown, Cox & Molligan 1585.14 348,331.50 68,136.53 416,468.03 Hollow, Reginald Frederick Monty 215.50 . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. KENTWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., 549 F. Supp. 480 (D. Md. 1982)

. . . The amounts due are as follows: Tanya Carol Hale $ 337.25 Frank Harris 215.50 Winona Hale Mahoney 131.23 . . .

FIRST PRUDENTIAL BANK OF WEST PALM BEACH v. ROLLE D. S. WOOD ASSOCIATES, v. SJOSTEN, 45 Fla. Supp. 128 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1976)

. . . Snelling and Snellihg, obtained a final judgment against the defendant Cindy Sjosten in the sum of $215.50 . . .

GORDON v. FORSYTH COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, INC., 409 F. Supp. 708 (M.D.N.C. 1975)

. . . Authority wrote to the plaintiff Irene Setzer informing her of her alleged indebtedness in the amount of $215.50 . . .

NORTHBRIDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 444 F.2d 1124 (Ct. Cl. 1971)

. . . the total amount of the equitable adjustment to which plaintiff was entitled to be $7,745.50 — $1,-215.50 . . .

ANDREWS v. F. DILLON,, 319 F. Supp. 724 (W.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . Section 215.55 of the New York Penal Law unconstitutional on their face and as applied, and that Sections 215.50 . . . an arraignment in the City Court of Buffalo on a charge of criminal contempt in violation of Section 215.50 . . . Informations charging plaintiffs with violations of Sections 140.10 and 215.50 of the Penal Law have . . . The plaintiffs claim that prosecution in City Court for violation of Section 215.50 of the Penal Law . . . In pertinent part, Section 215.50 provides : “A person is guilty of criminal contempt when he engages . . .

REHM v. UNITED STATES, 196 F. Supp. 428 (E.D.N.Y. 1961)

. . . Manning, x-rays and miscellaneous matters 635 (f) Southside Hospital bill 215.50 (g) Dr. . . .

In VICKSBURG BRIDGE TERMINAL CO., 22 F. Supp. 490 (S.D. Miss. 1937)

. . . Del., on December 20, 1927, and on the same date there was paid to the secretary of state the sum of $215.50 . . .

HICKORY SPINNING CO., 1 B.T.A. 409 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . and in the same letter had determined an overassessment as to the years 1917 and 1920, in the sum of-$215.50 . . .