The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.51

215.51 Investment accounts; changes, notice, etc.—

(1) The board shall keep, for each fund for which investments are made, a separate account, to be designated by name and number, which shall record the individual amounts and the totals of all investments belonging to such fund. Every receipt and collection or disbursement when received or made shall be immediately reported to the board for recording to the particular fund to which it belongs.

(2) The board shall make written report monthly to each and every interested state official or agency and the judicial branch the changes in investments made during the preceding month for their respective fund or funds, and, in addition, shall furnish the details on the investment transaction of any fund upon written request of such state official or agency or judicial branch or head thereof.

History.—s. 9, ch. 57-353; s. 24, ch. 92-142.

F.S. 215.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.51

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.51

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.51.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE MOORE- MCKINNEY,, 603 B.R. 855 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . 2018 $0 $17,592.55 $102.62 1/1/2018-2/1/2018 2/1/2018 $420.75 $17,592.55 ($205.24) 2/1/2018-3/1/2018 ($215.51 . . .

PHAM, v. M. KIRKPATRICK,, 209 F. Supp. 3d 497 (N.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Act in the First Degree (Penal Law § 130.50(1)), Criminal Contempt in the First Degree (Penal Law § 215.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ- ESPINAL,, 762 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . He later added that merely harassing or annoying someone could be a basis for a conviction under § 215.51 . . . conviction was for aggravated criminal contempt under § 215.52 rather than for criminal contempt under § 215.51 . . . did not argue that he might actually have been convicted of non-aggravated criminal contempt under § 215.51 . . . Although he mentioned that harassing or annoying someone could be a basis for a conviction under § 215.51 . . . statement and was quickly reminded by the prosecutor that the statute at issue was § 215.52, not § 215.51 . . .

DONGGUAN SUNRISE FURNITURE CO. LTD. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 997 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . received a rate of 39.41%, which included partial AFA rates of 182.15% for the unreported armoires, 215.51% . . .

DONGGUAN SUNRISE FURNITURE CO. LTD. Co. Co. Co. Co. COE Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 931 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . Fairmont received a rate of 39.41%, which included partial AFA rates of 182.15% for armoires, 215.51% . . .

DONGGUAN SUNRISE FURNITURE CO. LTD. Co. Co. Co. Co. COE Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 904 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . The resulting AFA dumping margin rates are 182.15% for armoires, 215.51% for chests, 134.42% for nightstands . . .

LOUISAIRE, v. MULLER, U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 758 F. Supp. 2d 229 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 215.51(d). See id., Exh. 10 (Certificate of Disposition). . . . Louisaire because his latest conviction for criminal contempt under New York Penal Law § 215.51(d) does . . . New York Penal Law § 215.51(d) punishes an individual who “intentionally or recklessly damages the property . . . Louisaire’s conviction under New York Penal Law § 215.51(d) does not constitute a CIMT, Respondents’ . . . N.Y.P.L. § 215.51(d). . . . .

PORTALATIN, v. GRAHAM, v. M. v. M., 624 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Law § 215.51(b). . . .

W. SWAIL, v. HUNT,, 742 F. Supp. 2d 352 (W.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . indictment, which alleged that Swail committed first degree criminal contempt in violation of Penal Law § 215.51 . . . People’s bill of particulars, charges defendant with criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 . . .

BESSER, a k a v. WALSH, v. M. v. v. M. v., 601 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Law § 215.51(b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 606 F. Supp. 2d 306 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in the first degree in violation of New York Penal Law Section 215.51 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. SUPERINTENDENT, COLLINS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,, 549 F. Supp. 2d 226 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Penal Law §§ 215.51(b)(1), 215.51(b)(vi), 215.51(b)(v)); third degree criminal possession of a weapon . . . Penal Law §§ 70.00(2)(e); 215.51(b)(1), (5), (6)), and a maximum term of one year for each count of second . . .

JAEGLY, Jr. v. COUCH,, 439 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . cause to arrest Jaegly for criminal contempt in the first degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law § 215.51 . . . Law § 215.51(b)(v). . . . Franklin, 305 A.D.2d 613, 760 N.Y.S.2d 511 (3d Dept. 2003) (upholding conviction under § 215.51(b)(v) . . . Orbaker, 302 A.D.2d 977, 754 N.Y.S.2d 492 (4th Dept. 2003) (affirming conviction under § 215.51 (b)(v . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHATELAIN,, 360 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . that, as a result, Chatelain was arrested and “chai'ged with Criminal Contempt in the 1st degree, P.L. 215.51 . . . State crime in violating a court imposed Order of Protection in violation of New York State Penal Law 215.51 . . . Penal Law § 215.51(b)® and (v). . . . Given the citation of § 215.51(b) in the memoranda, along with the memoranda’s detailed descriptions . . . Penal Law § 215.51(b), as quoted in part II.A. above. . . .

BULLARD Jo v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 240 F. Supp. 2d 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 215.51), and criminal contempt in the second degree (N.Y. Penal L. § 215.50). (Id.) . . .

FULTON Jr. v. ROBINSON,, 289 F.3d 188 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 215.51(b)®, (ii), and (vi) (McKinney 1999); the other was a misdemeanor information/complaint charging . . .

McCASLIN, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, OF YORKMAIN BRANCH McCASLIN, v. FILLMORE COUNTY L. McCASLIN, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, McCASLIN, v. DOE L. NE Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. McCASLIN, v. U. S. POST OFFICE, 43 F.3d 1182 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . ordered MeCaslin to pay $53.75 by May 20, 1993, based on a six-month average trust account balance of $215.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF CHICAGO,, 621 F. Supp. 1296 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . training sessions for administrators, teachers, and para-professionals. (34 C.F.R. 215.11; 215.15a; 215.51 . . .

MARANGELLO, v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 563 F. Supp. 750 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . and Prior Proceedings Nicholas Marangello was convicted of criminal contempt, New York Penal Law § 215.51 . . .

STAHL, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 520 F. Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Supreme Court, New York County, on two counts of criminal contempt, first degree, in violation of § 215.51 . . .

LANGELLA, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF NEW YORK,, 545 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . to answer other questions, and on January 16, 1973 he was indicted, pursuant to New York Penal Law § 215.51 . . . To be guilty of contempt under New York Penal Law § 215.51 a “witness need not flatly refuse to answer . . .

LANGELLA, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF NEW YORK,, 413 F. Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . Penal Law § 215.51. Petitioner was sentenced to a term of five months imprisonment. . . . Penal Law § 215.51. . . .