Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 215.70 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 215.70 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 215.70

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 215.70
215.70 State Board of Administration to act in case of defaults.
(1) If funds sufficient for the payment of the principal and interest due at any time on any bonds of the state or on any bonds issued on behalf of any state agency are not remitted to the State Board of Administration in sufficient time to pay the same when due, the State Board of Administration shall succeed to all the powers of the state officials or state agency on behalf of which such bonds were issued relating to the collection of taxes, revenues, or any other funds pledged for the payment of the principal of or interest on such bonds. It shall be the duty of the State Board of Administration to take over and enforce the levy, fixing, and collecting of such taxes, revenues, or other pledged funds and to apply the same in the manner provided in the proceeding which authorized the issuance of such bonds.
(2) The provisions of this section do not prevent, however, the appointment of a receiver for any of the properties or facilities of any state agency for which any revenues or other funds have been pledged, upon the default of such state agency in the manner provided in the resolution or other proceedings which authorized the bonds issued by the division on behalf of such state agency.
(3) The State Board of Administration shall monitor the debt service accounts for bonds issued pursuant to this act. The board shall advise the Governor and Legislature of any projected need to appropriate funds to honor the pledge of full faith and credit of the state. The report must include the estimated amount of appropriations needed, the estimated maximum amount of appropriations needed, and a contingency appropriation request for each bond issue.
(4) Whenever it becomes necessary for state funds to be appropriated for the payment of principal or interest on bonds which have been issued by the Division of Bond Finance on behalf of any local government or authority and for which the full faith and credit of the state has been pledged, any state shared revenues otherwise earmarked for the local government or authority shall be used by the Chief Financial Officer to reimburse the state, until the local government or authority has reimbursed the state in full.
History.s. 15, ch. 69-230; s. 2, ch. 84-171; s. 227, ch. 2003-261; s. 54, ch. 2010-102.

F.S. 215.70 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.70 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.70


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.70
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.70.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 215.70 (West 2010) (designating unlawful grand jury disclosure as a felony). 3 Finally, the President . . .

F. THOMAS, v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM, s A., 257 F. Supp. 2d 711 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . s grand jury testimony in contravention of both the special prosecutor order and New York’s Penal § 215.70 . . . We find no unlawful grand jury disclosure pursuant to New York Penal Law Section 215.70 because Velardi . . .

BARNETT L. v. DILLON, 890 F. Supp. 83 (N.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 215.70 (McKinney 1988). Federal grand jury proceedings are also secret. Fed. . . .

SCHEINER, v. WALLACE, s J. M., 860 F. Supp. 991 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . New York Penal Law § 215.70 provides in relevant part: "A person is guilty of unlawful grand jury disclosure . . .

C. MOON, v. L. RICHARDSON,, 345 F. Supp. 1182 (W.D. Va. 1972)

. . . Her earnings record showed she was paid wages of $215.70 in 1953, $193.44 in 1954, $50.00 in 1955, and . . .

v., 45 T.C. 368 (T.C. 1966)

. . . ended January 31, 1959,” in the amount of $7,360.14 and an additional deficiency in the amount of $215.70 . . . By amendment to his answer, respondent claimed an increased deficiency in the amount of $215.70, based . . .

JAMES DAVISON v. THE UNITED STATES, 43 Ct. Cl. 308 (Ct. Cl. 1908)

. . . lieutenant, mounted and retired, with 40 per cent increase_ $51.09 Total _ 2,983.24-' Deduct tax on $215.70 . . .