Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 218.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 218.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 218.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 218
FINANCIAL MATTERS PERTAINING TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 218.25
218.25 Limitation of shared funds; holders of bonds protected; limitation on use of second guaranteed entitlement for counties.—
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) with respect to the second guaranteed entitlement for counties, local governments shall not use any portion of the moneys received in excess of the guaranteed entitlement from the revenue sharing trust funds created by this part to assign, pledge, or set aside as a trust for the payment of principal or interest on bonds, tax anticipation certificates, or any other form of indebtedness, and there shall be no other use restriction on revenues shared pursuant to this part. The state does hereby covenant with holders of bonds or other instruments of indebtedness issued by local governments prior to July 1, 1972, that it is not the intent of this part to affect adversely the rights of said holders or to relieve local governments of the duty to meet their obligations as a result of previous pledges or assignments or trusts entered into which obligated funds received from revenue sources which by terms of this part shall henceforth be distributed out of the revenue sharing trust funds.
(2) The second guaranteed entitlement for counties may be assigned, pledged, or set aside as a trust for the payment of principal or interest on bonds, tax anticipation certificates, or any other form of indebtedness, including obligations issued to acquire an insurance contract or contracts from a local government liability pool and including payments required pursuant to any loan agreement entered into to provide funds to acquire an insurance contract or contracts from a local government liability pool.
(3) As an additional assurance to holders of bonds issued before April 18, 2000, which are secured by the guaranteed entitlement or second guaranteed entitlement for counties, or bonds issued to refund such bonds which mature no later than the bonds that they refunded and which result in a reduction of debt service payable in each fiscal year, it is the intent of the Legislature that, to the extent the elimination of tax sources dedicated to funding the guaranteed entitlement or the second guaranteed entitlement for counties or a reduction in the rate of assessment of such taxes results in an inability of a county to pay debt service on such bonds, the Legislature will provide alternative funding sources in an amount sufficient to pay any deficit in the amount required for such debt service. This commitment of the Legislature is contingent on the county first using any funds available under this part for the payment of such debt service.
(4) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (2), a local government may assign, pledge, or set aside as a trust for the payment of principal or interest on bonds, tax anticipation certificates, or any other form of indebtedness an amount up to 50 percent of the funds received in the prior year.
History.—s. 1, ch. 72-360; s. 1, ch. 73-349; s. 1, ch. 74-194; s. 9, ch. 87-237; s. 11, ch. 2000-173; s. 96, ch. 2003-402.

F.S. 218.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 218.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 218.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 218.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 218.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. FARNSWORTH,, 709 F. App'x 461 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 218.25(a)(1)(i) does not appear to require the Forest Service to conduct a public-comment period . . .

YARBROUGH, v. EAST WAKE FIRST CHARTER SCHOOL, a k a, 108 F. Supp. 3d 331 (E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . § 115C-218.25 (subjecting charter schools to the Public Records Act and Open Meetings Law); N.C. . . .

SATAKI, v. BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS,, 733 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . periods 5 through 10 (February 28, 2010 through May 21, 2010), Plaintiff was paid for approximately 218.25 . . .

SINGLETON, v. UNITED STATES,, 92 Fed. Cl. 78 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . along an approximately 29.55-mile right-of-way of the Missouri North Central Railroad, from milepost 218.25 . . . The segments of the subject right-of-way at issue are located between milepost 218.25 near Norville, . . . own an interest in lands constituting part of the railroad corridor or right-of-way, between milepost 218.25 . . .

MORANT, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD,, 66 F.3d 518 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . (a) Blue Signals displayed in accordance with §§ 218.25, 218.27, or 218.29 signify that workmen are on . . . (b) Blue Signals must be displayed in accordance with §§ 218.25, 218.27, or 218.29 by each craft or group . . .

E. SHEPHERD, v. AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., 862 F. Supp. 505 (D.D.C. 1994)

. . . McPheters' hours as "218.25” instead of "219.25.” . . .

In BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION,, 46 B.R. 966 (D. Mass. 1984)

. . . period from March 27, 1972 to October 30, 1981, the Applicant devoted 678.25 hours to the pending cases, 218.25 . . . hourly rate, from 1972 to 1981, of Applicant for the 678.25 hours was $122.59 and of Culbert for the 218.25 . . .

McNEIL, v. P. OGBURN, 507 F. Supp. 96 (N.D. Fla. 1981)

. . . Patterson sought payment for 218.25 hours in Marion v. . . .

CAPOCCI M. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 444 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Haw. 1978)

. . . 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 NOV 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 DEC 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 1974 . . . JAN 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 NEB 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 MAR 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 . . . 0.00 APR 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 MAY 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 [1974] JNE 218.25 263.99 . . . * 263.99 0.00 0.00 JLY 218.25 263.99* 263.99 0.00 0.00 -Earnings exceed $2400 AUG 218.25 263.99* 263.99 . . . 0.00 0.00 SEPT 218.25 263.99* 208.69+55.30 0.00 0.00 -1974 overpayments begin with $55.30 OCT 221.85 . . .

J. GOLDBERG, v. FORCUM- LANNOM, INC., 205 F. Supp. 119 (W.D. Tenn. 1962)

. . . During the period between the week ending September 29, 1961 and the week ending December 8, 1961, 218.25 . . .

WECKLER v. VALLEY CITY MILL. CO., 93 F. Supp. 444 (W.D. Mich. 1950)

. . . the instalments for two quarters in 1927 and three quarters in 1928, amounting in the aggregate to $218.25 . . . Plaintiff received these dividends on her stock, which, as hereinbefore mentioned, totaled $218.25. . . .

MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS N v. SIMMONS, 107 F. 418 (1st Cir. 1901)

. . . It computed the note as follows: It took one-half of the premium, — that is to say, $218.25, — added . . . The §84.82 must have been a part of the $218.25 which went to make up the note, leaving White only $133.43 . . .

GRAY v. HARPER, 10 F. Cas. 1010 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841)

. . . 128.45 140.83 500 60.20 24.30 “ -5, 2500 295.43 118.45 “ 6, 1500 174.15 73.00 500 53.40 21.60 “ 7, 1500 218.25 . . .