The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 218
FINANCIAL MATTERS PERTAINING TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 218.63

218.63 Participation requirements.—

(1) Only those units of local government which meet the eligibility requirements for revenue sharing pursuant to s. 218.23 shall participate in the local government half-cent sales tax. However, a municipality incorporated subsequent to the effective date of chapter 82-154, Laws of Florida, which does not meet the applicable criteria for incorporation pursuant to s. 165.061 shall not participate in the local government half-cent sales tax. In either case, distributions to eligible units of local government in that county shall be made as though the nonparticipating municipality had not incorporated.

(2) The moneys which otherwise would be distributed pursuant to this part to a unit of local government failing to certify compliance as required by s. 218.23(1) or having otherwise failed to meet the requirements of s. 200.065 shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund for the 12 months following a determination of noncompliance by the department.

(3) A county or municipality may not participate in the distribution of local government half-cent sales tax revenues during the 12 months following a determination of noncompliance by the Department of Revenue as provided in s. 200.065(13)(e).

History.—s. 10, ch. 82-154; s. 14, ch. 83-204; s. 87, ch. 83-217; s. 8, ch. 87-239; s. 4, ch. 2007-321.

F.S. 218.63 on Google Scholar

F.S. 218.63 on Casetext

Amendments to 218.63

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 218.63

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 218.63.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, v. IDAHO FIRST NATIONAL BANK, V. A. M., 328 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1964)

. . . and his executor was substituted) were entitled to a credit against the plaintiff’s claim of $1,049,-218.63 . . . from the said $1,049,218.63 and awarded judgment against the defendants in the principal sum of $669,-218.63 . . . set-off in the amount of $380,000, and the court awarded a principal judgment in the amount of $669,-218.63 . . .

DOLOGAARDT v. ANNA, 18 F. Cas. 742 (D.R.I. 1870)

. . . the petitioners, quoting as unimpeachable and unobjectionable, the adjusters’ statement, claim that $218.63 . . .