Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 220.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 220.23 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 220.23

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 220
INCOME TAX CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 220.23
220.23 Federal returns.
(1) Any taxpayer required to make a return for a taxable year under this code may, at any time that a deficiency could be assessed or a refund claimed under this code in respect of any item reported or properly reportable on such return or any amendment thereof, be required to furnish to the department a true and correct copy of any return which may pertain to such item and which was filed by such taxpayer under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
(2) In the event the taxable income, any item of income or deduction, or the income tax liability reported in a federal income tax return of any taxpayer for any taxable year is adjusted by amendment of such return or as a result of any other recomputation or redetermination of federal taxable income or loss, if such adjustment would affect any item or items entering into the computation of such taxpayer’s net income subject to tax for any taxable year under this code, the following special rules shall apply:
(a) The taxpayer shall notify the department of such adjustment by filing either an amended return or such other report as the department may by regulation prescribe, which return or report:
1. Shall show the taxpayer’s name, address, and employer identification number; the adjustments; the taxpayer’s revised net income subject to tax and revised tax liability under this code; and such other information as the department may by regulation prescribe;
2. Shall be signed by a person required to sign the original return or by a duly authorized representative; and
3. Shall be filed not later than 60 days after such adjustment has been agreed to or finally determined for federal income tax purposes, or after any federal income tax deficiency or refund, abatement, or credit resulting therefrom has been assessed, paid, or collected, whichever shall first occur.
(b) If the amended return or other report filed with the department concedes the accuracy of a federal change or correction, any deficiency in tax under this code resulting therefrom shall be deemed assessed on the date of filing such amended return or report, and such assessment shall be timely, notwithstanding any other provision contained in part VIII of this chapter.
(c) In any case where notification of an adjustment is required under paragraph (a), then notwithstanding any other provision contained in s. 95.091(3):
1. A notice of deficiency may be issued at any time within 5 years after the date such notification is given; or
2. If a taxpayer either fails to notify the department or fails to report a change or correction which is treated in the same manner as if it were a deficiency for federal income tax purposes, a notice of deficiency may be issued at any time;
3. In either case, the amount of any proposed assessment set forth in such notice shall be limited to the amount of any deficiency resulting under this code from recomputation of the taxpayer’s income for the taxable year after giving effect only to the item or items reflected in the adjustment.

Interest in accordance with s. 220.807 is due on the amount of any deficiency from the date fixed for filing the original return for the taxable year, determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the original return, until the date of payment of the deficiency.

(d) In any case when notification of an adjustment is required by paragraph (a), a claim for refund may be filed within 2 years after the date on which such notification was due, regardless of whether such notice was given, notwithstanding any other provision contained in s. 220.727. However, the amount recoverable pursuant to such a claim shall be limited to the amount of any overpayment resulting under this code from recomputation of the taxpayer’s income for the taxable year after giving effect only to the item or items reflected in the adjustment required to be reported.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-984; s. 57, ch. 87-6; s. 94, ch. 91-112; s. 44, ch. 2002-218.

F.S. 220.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 220.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 220.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 220.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 220.23.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In BROOKS, v. ECMC, 406 B.R. 382 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2009)

. . . $43.86 $38,895.05 3 48 ’ $220.23 $43.86 $41,011.49 4 60 $220.23 $43.86 $43,127.93 5 72 $220.23 $43.86 . . . $45,244.37 6 84 $220.23 $43.86 $47,360.81 7 96 $220.23 $43.86 $49,477.25 8 108 $220.23 $43.86 $51,593.69 . . . 156 $220.23 $43.86 $60,059.45 13 168 $220.23 $43.86 $62,175.89 14 180 $220.23 $43.86 $64,292.33 15 192 . . . $220.23 $43.86 $66,408.77 16 204 $220.23 $43.86 $68,525.21 17 216 $220.23 $43.86 $70,641.65 18 228 $220.23 . . . $43.86 $72,758.09 19 240_$220.23 $43.86 $74,874.53 20 252 $220.23 $43.86 $76,990.97 21 264 $220.23 $43.86 . . .

BARNETT BANKS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 738 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 220.23(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . See § 220.23(2)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . part as follows: Every taxpayer required to file a return under this code or a notification under s. 220.23 . . . return, or (2) the date fixed for filing a federal taxable income adjustment notification under section 220.23 . . . which states that a tax is due on or before the date fixed for filing of a notification under section 220.23 . . .

In UNIVERSAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION SERVICE, INC. UNIVERSAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION SERVICE, INC. v. DESIRE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP., 223 B.R. 88 (Bankr. E.D. La. 1998)

. . . . $220.23 in account number 812270699, titled Insurance. 5. $10,802.25 in account number 3001049513, . . . account number 812374028. —$46.62 in account number 221004825, titled Rehab Life Fund Repayment. —$220.23 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACOSTA,, 963 F.2d 551 (2d Cir. 1992)

. . . It has, however, considered it with respect to former section 220.23 of New York’s Penal Law, which made . . .

P. HULSEY, v. USAIR, INC., 868 F.2d 1423 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 220.23. . . . .

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Fe St. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS E., 671 F. Supp. 466 (W.D. Tex. 1987)

. . . . §§ 220.23, 220.39, and 220.47 as proof that federal regulation already addresses this area. . . .

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. v. BROCK, SECRETARY OF LABOR,, 480 U.S. 678 (U.S. 1987)

. . . See, e. g., §§220.23, 220.25, and 220.27. . . .

ST. JOE PAPER COMPANY, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 460 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 220.23(2), Florida Statutes (1983), requires a taxpayer to notify the Department when an IRS . . . Joe rebuts the Department’s assertion of untimeliness by pointing out Section 220.23(2)(d), Florida Statutes . . . (1983), which gives a taxpayer two years after the filing of Section 220.23 notification in which to . . . If “the return” of Section 214.14 includes Section 220.23 notification, as the Department contends, Section . . . 220.23(2)(d) is superfluous since in that case such notification would itself restart the three-year . . . when — as here — the taxpayer is subjected to a federal tax audit and, under the provisions of section 220.23 . . . argued, and I agree, that the time for filing a refund claim is extended by the provisions of section 220.23 . . . passage of three years from the filing of an original return, in my judgment the provisions of sections 220.23 . . . for refund, by reading the provisions of section 214.16(l)(a) in pari materia with those of section 220.23 . . .

BELLAVIA, v. FOGG,, 613 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . Penal Law § 220.23 (now § 220.21), and criminal possession of a drug in the fourth degree, N.Y. . . . Penal Law §§ 70.00, 220.44 (now § 220.43) and 220.23 (now § 220.21) is in my view unconstitutional as . . .

A. LOPEZ, GARCIA, v. CURRY,, 454 F. Supp. 1200 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . Penal Law § 220.15 and § 220.23. . . . .

REHMAN, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 544 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . Penal Law § 220.23 (McKinney Supp. 1975). . . .

UNITED STATES DANEFF, v. HENDERSON,, 501 F.2d 1180 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . dangerous drug in the first degree, a “class A felony” under New York Penal Law § 220.33 (renumbered § 220.23 . . . Under § 220.23, possession of a “mixture” of 16 ounces or more is punishable as a class A felony, with . . .

BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DUVAL COUNTY v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ADVANCEMENT COLORED PEOPLE,, 28 Fla. Supp. 102 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)

. . . Florida Statutes §220.23(4) (c). . Florida Statutes §232.01. . 32 Fla. Jur., Torts, §12 (1960). . . .

STATE SLATER, v. P. SMITH, O. A. D. A. S. St., 142 So. 2d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . This contract shall not operate to prevent discontinuance of a position as provided by Law (Sections 220.23 . . .