DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES,,
20 So. 3d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
. . . position that this so-called “bill” observed adequate compliance with the notice requirements of section 220.711 . . . Section 220.711 sets forth the requirements for what a notice of deficiency must contain. . . . September, 2003, while not employing the caption “notice of deficiency,” nevertheless complies with section 220.711 . . . Catalina attempts to circumvent section 220.711 by arguing that “bills” are something totally separate . . . sent to Catalina complied with the requirements for a notice of deficiency as set forth in section 220.711 . . .
