Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 243.75 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 243.75 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 243.75

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVI
TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS
Chapter 243
HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 243.75
243.75 Alternative means.Sections 243.50-243.77 provide an additional and alternative method for the doing of the things authorized, and shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to powers conferred by other laws; but, except as otherwise specifically provided in ss. 243.50-243.77, the issuance of notes, certificates of participation, revenue bonds, and revenue refunding bonds under ss. 243.50-243.77 need not comply with the requirements of any other law applicable to the issuance of bonds or such obligations. Except as otherwise expressly provided in ss. 243.50-243.77, the powers granted to the authority under ss. 243.50-243.77 are not subject to the supervision or regulation of, and do not require the approval or consent of, any municipality or political subdivision or any commission, board, body, bureau, official, or agency thereof or of the state.
History.s. 26, ch. 2001-79.

F.S. 243.75 on Google Scholar

F.S. 243.75 on Casetext

Amendments to 243.75


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 243.75
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 243.75.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WALES, v. JACK M. BERRY, INC., 192 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . hours for the following attorneys and paralegals in the amounts indicated: Anderson (104), Barkus (243.75 . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT D. C. v. MADISON HOTEL, INC., 43 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 1999)

. . . 5,281.25 rhm 72.75 $125 $ 9,093.75 nmm 26.5 $125 $ 3,312.50 EJD 5.25 $125 $ 656.25 Paralegal 3.25 $ 75 $ 243.75 . . .

GARDEN STATE AUTO PARK PONTIAC GMC TRUCK, INC. v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION,, 31 F. Supp. 2d 378 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . Summary Judgment From February 1995 to June 1996, G & C spent approximately 243.75 hours and charged . . . Order as well as the parties’ submissions on this point lead us to conclude that the expenditure of 243.75 . . .

RICHARDS, v. AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY d b a, 935 F. Supp. 863 (S.D. Miss. 1996)

. . . investigation of plaintiffs claim for benefits and entered its Notice of First Payment in the amount of $243.75 . . .

REICH, v. COLE ENTERPRISES, INC., 901 F. Supp. 255 (S.D. Ohio 1993)

. . . Michael 155.08 Dixon, Joe D. 71.76 Eduardo, Rosemarie 330.29 Hatfield, Carolyn 149.38 Kennedy, Sylvia 243.75 . . .

DeVITO, v. HEMPSTEAD CHINA SHOP, INC., 831 F. Supp. 1037 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . The plaintiffs’ application requests compensation for approximately 243.75 attorney-hours broken down . . . Court finds that the number of hours for which plaintiffs’ counsel seek compensation, specifically, 243.75 . . .

In B. GRIMES A., 115 B.R. 639 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1990)

. . . Chicago to Aberdeen to Chicago o CO © oo Total = $975.00 13.0 hours at $75.00 per hour Reduced to 25% = $243.75 . . .

A. UZZELL III, J. B. L. E. II, v. C. FRIDAY, Jr. J. D., 618 F. Supp. 1222 (M.D.N.C. 1985)

. . . at $75.00 per hour or $2,316.00 for a total of $2,714.25; Molen, 3.25 hours at $75.00 per hour or $243.75 . . . Parrigin, III; Two Hundred Forty-Three and 75/100’s Dollars ($243.75) to John K. . . .

INTERNATIONAL WOOD PROCESSORS, a v. POWER DRY, INC. a a a a a a K. N. J., 598 F. Supp. 299 (D.S.C. 1984)

. . . .-1982 72.50 67.43 85.00 5,731.12 1983 66.50 61,845.00 100.00 6,184.50 1984 243.75 226.69 110.00 24,935.62 . . .

In BENNETT,, 6 B.R. 401 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1980)

. . . check executed by Herbert Bennett on August 16, 1976, to Geraldine Foster for “$500 principal” and “$243.75 . . .

JOSEPH H. ROBERTS v. THE UNITED STATES GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD- PARTY DEFENDANT, 174 Ct. Cl. 940 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . , S20.00 No. 2 Additional paving- 222. 50 No. 3 Furnishing and placing additional expansion joints_ 243.75 . . .

METROPOLITAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION, v. C. LEBOWITZ, 293 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir. 1961)

. . . (b) $243.75 per week, subject to allowance of 15% agency commission for advertisers broadcasting 52 times . . .

v. A., 55 Fla. 462 (Fla. 1908)

. . . . $ 243.75 To port charges between Tampa and Mobile 79-5° To port charges between Nipe Bay and Manzanillo . . .

THOMAS AND DRISCOLL v. THE UNITED STATES, 32 Ct. Cl. 41 (Ct. Cl. 1896)

. . . C. drains around 9 window areas. 243.75 34. 4 ft. 4-in. terra-cotta pipe. .33 35. . . .