The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . over property originally conveyed by appellee’s predecessor in title to Broward County under section 255.22 . . . While the trial court found conflict between certain subsections of section 255.22, it resolved those . . . See § 255.22, Fla. Stat. (1997) (effective date May 15, 1995). . . .
. . . of Fort Lauderdale to reeonvey the easement at issue to McDonald’s Corporation pursuant to section 255.22 . . . Even though McDonald’s is not the “grantor’s successor” within the meaning of section 255.22(5), it is . . .
. . . At trial, the Donaldsons successfully contended they were entitled, under sections 255.22 and 255.23, . . . Relying on sections 255.22 and 255.23, the court below concluded that the 1963 deed, while it was a single . . . While an easement is a property interest subject to transfer by deed, section 255.22 did not contemplate . . . A reconveyance under section 255.22 could not vest the fee title with the Donaldsons but, at most, would . . . Section 255.22, Florida Statutes (1983), states as follows: Reconveyance of lands not used for purpose . . .
. . . Plaintiff has also requested reimbursement for litigation costs totalling $255.22. . . . Plaintiff requests $255.22 as reimbursement for the costs of litigation. . . . Service 25.60 Filing and Miscellaneous 28.00 Overtime Meals and Car 20.16 Local Transportation 30-50 $255.22 . . .
. . . We consider next Vereen’s agreement under Sections 255.22 and 255.23, Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Vereen is entitled to reconveyance under Section 255.22 only if he proves (a) he conveyed the land to . . . the requested zoning variance should not constitute valuable consideration for purposes of Section 255.22 . . . For the reasons set forth above, we find Vereen is not entitled to reconveyance under Section 255.22 . . .
. . . plaintiff-appellee claimed it was entitled to reconveyance of the property by virtue of the provisions of Sections 255.22 . . . case the trial court did not predicate the judgment on the statute invoked by the plaintiff [Sections 255.22 . . .
. . . a balance due under the return of $6,544.13, which was duly assessed, and with interest thereon of $255.22 . . .