The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 261
OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE SAFETY AND RECREATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 261.11

261.11 Penalties.—No off-highway vehicle may be operated upon the public roads, streets, or highways of this state, except as otherwise permitted by the managing local, state, or federal agency. A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as provided in chapter 318.

History.—s. 53, ch. 2002-295.

F.S. 261.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 261.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 261.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 261.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 261.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, v. ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 367 F. Supp. 3d 267 (M.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . . § 261.11(b)(1) would often seem warranted when a party seeks financial-examination documents held by . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. WASSON,, 627 F. App'x 604 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 261.11(d) (improper removal or disposal of sewage). . . . He therefore contends that a person can comply with § 261.11(d) by depositing waste into any sort of . . . See, e.g,, 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(b) (prohibiting the possession of “refuse, debris, or litter in an exposed . . . or unsanitary condition”); id. § 261.11(c) (prohibiting the release of “any substance” that might cause . . . For example, a person could comply with Wasson’s reading of 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(d) by depositing waste . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. GODFREY,, 112 F. Supp. 3d 1097 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 261.11(c). Id. . . . Count 5 In Count 5, Defendant is alleged to have violatéd 36 C.F.R. § 261.11, which prohibits “[p]lacing . . . In finding Defendant guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(c), the Magistrate Judge noted that Defendant . . . As an initial matter, the structure of 36 C.F.R. § 261.11 is informative. . . . Thus, the provisions surrounding 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(c) lend support to Defendant’s argument that “any . . .

APPALACHIAN VOICES, v. MCCARTHY, In, 989 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . §§ 261.11(a)(1), 261.20-24 (2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. EVERIST,, 376 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 261.11(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. PEPPER,, 697 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 261.11(d). . . . The defendant is charged with violating 36 C.F.R. 261.11(d) for “[flailing to dispose of ... sewage, . . . that the defendant’s discharge of waste water in the manner observed would satisfy the elements of § 261.11 . . . CONCLUSION The court finds that the defendant is guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.11(d), for “failing . . . appeared to observe would be encompassed within the definition of "sewage” and "waste water” as used in § 261.11 . . .

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, B. B. K. N. G. S., 503 F.3d 596 (7th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 261.11, entitled: “Discretion of the three-member board to reopen or not to reopen a final decision . . . Potts likewise relies on section 261.11 as a basis for reopening his case. . . . . § 261.11 While section 261.11 provides the Board with discretion to reopen cases that are not otherwise . . . Thus, by its own terms, 20 C.F.R. § 261.11 does not apply to this case. . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 292 F.3d 895 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 261.11(a)(l-3). . . . Id. § 261.11(a)(3). . . .

AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 216 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3) (emphasis added), and thus were improperly listed as “hazardous waste.” . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 6921(a); 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(3). . . . human health and environmental damage that has occurred” from mismanagement of the waste, 40 C.F.R. § 261.11 . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 210 F.3d 396 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3), which refers to “any toxic constituent,” imposed on EPA the heavier burden of surveying . . . , EPA has promulgated listing criteria to determine whether solid wastes are hazardous. 40 C.F.R. § 261.11 . . . issue are not listed in Appendix VIII of Part 261, petitioners maintain that EPA cannot construe § 261.11 . . . (xi) Such other factors as may be appropriate. 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(3). . . . . the same as demonstrating that EPA abused its discretion to limit the scope of its rulemaking under § 261.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 195 F.3d 823 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 261.10 & 261.11. . . .

MILITARY TOXICS PROJECT, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M. U. S., 146 F.3d 948 (D.C. Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3)(x), we said: To accept petitioners’ proposition that EPA may not rationally rely on . . .

MERCHANTS BANK, v. VESCIO,, 205 B.R. 37 (D. Vt. 1997)

. . . . §§ 261.11(g), 309.6(a), and 309.5(a). . . .

DITHIOCARBAMATE TASK FORCE, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 98 F.3d 1394 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste, 40 CFR § 261.11(a)(3) (1995) (bracketed material added . . . The Present Rulemaking: Invoking its authority under 40 CFR § 261.11(a)(3), EPA proposed to list six . . . Moreover, the structure of 40 CFR § 261.11(a) forbids EPA’s reading. . . . See § 261.11(a)(3)(vii). . . . But 40 CFR § 261.11(a)(2) gives explicit toxicity benchmarks that are not satisfied here. . . .

In BANKERS TRUST COMPANY,, 61 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 261.11(g). . . .

STEEL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 27 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 261.11 (setting out criteria EPA considers in determining whether a solid waste should be listed . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 25 F.3d 1063 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 261.11, and concluded that used oils destined for disposal need not be listed as a hazardous waste . . . because the panoply of existing federal regulations governing the management of used oil, id. § 261.11 . . . (a)(3)(x), could control any plausible scenario of used oil mismanagement, id. § 261.11(a)(3)(vii). . . . Id. § 261.11(a)(3)(x). . . . (xi) Such other factors as may be appropriate. 40 C.F.R. §' 261.11(a)(3)(i)-(xi). . . . . . § 261.11(a)(3), concluded that “the current regulatory structure controlling the management of used . . . of the regulations which expressly permits the EPA to consider other regulatory schemes, 40 C.F.R. § 261.11 . . .

I. SCHREIBER, v. SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS BANCORP, INC. E. Jr. v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, I. SCHREIBER, v. SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS BANCORP, INC. E. Jr. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 11 F.3d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 261.2, 261.11(g), 261.13, 261.14, 309.6(c)(6). . . .

B. F. GOODRICH CO. v. MURTHA, v. RISDON CORP., 840 F. Supp. 180 (D. Conn. 1993)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RECTICEL FOAM CORPORATION, a k a L. P. O. E., 858 F. Supp. 726 (E.D. Tenn. 1993)

. . . . §§ 261.10; 261.11; 261.20-261.24. . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. K. REILLY, U. S. U. S., 303 U.S. App. D.C. 87 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3) (emphases added). . . . In January 1990 the EPA entered into a settlement agreement whereby it amended § 261.11(a)(3) to read . . . This court accordingly ordered that the 1990 amendment be vacated, that § 261.11(a)(3) read as it did . . . EPA then published a notice soliciting comment on its proposal to adopt anew its 1990 revision of § 261.11 . . . The current version of § 261.11(a)(3) is therefore identical to the regulation as first purportedly amended . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. K. REILLY, U. S. U. S., 1 F.3d 1254 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

In SUBPOENA SERVED UPON COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY, AND SECRETARY OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, 967 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 4.15-4.19 (OCC); §§ 261.11-261.14 (Board). . . .

SHELL OIL COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 950 F.2d 741 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(lH3)). . . .

CONNECTICUT COASTAL FISHERMEN S ASSOCIATION v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC. E. I., 777 F. Supp. 173 (D. Conn. 1991)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3), by leaching into the ground, is ‘discarded material,’ and hence a ‘solid waste.’ ” . . .

AMERICAN MINING CONGRESS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, FERROALLOYS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ASARCO INCORPORATED, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 285 U.S. App. D.C. 173 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3), because they contained one or more of the hazardous constituents listed in 40 C.F.R . . . believe that each of these wastes meets the criteria for listing as hazardous waste found at 40 CFR 261.11 . . . The petitioners claim, in addition, that EPA violated RCRA § 3001(a) and 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(3) by . . . action here is therefore not consistent with this regulatory precedent, in violation of 40 C.F.R. § 261.11 . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(3). . . . .

AMERICAN MINING CONGRESS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, FERROALLOYS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ASARCO INCORPORATED, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 907 F.2d 1179 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, K. E. I. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, K. RUBICON INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, K. HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT COUNCIL, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, E. I., 285 U.S. App. D.C. 140 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 261.11 (a)(3)(ii); 42 U.S.C. § 6921(b) (requiring the Administrator to list wastes as hazardous if . . . exhibiting a hazardous characteristic (ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, toxicity). 40 C.F.R. §§ 261.11 . . .

. . . . § 261.11(a)(3)(h); 42 U.S.C. § 6921(b) (requiring the Administrator to list wastes as hazardous if . . . exhibiting a hazardous characteristic (ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, toxicity). 40 C.F.R. §§ 261.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLOW WATER SYSTEMS, A DIVISION OF McWANE, INC., 701 F. Supp. 1345 (S.D. Ohio 1988)

. . . . § 261.11(a). . . . have toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic effects on humans or other life forms. 40 C.F.R. § 261.11 . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M., 271 U.S. App. D.C. 342 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 261.11(b), 261.30-261.33 (1986), or they are found to have one of four technical characteristics . . . of hazardousness, see 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(1). . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M., 852 F.2d 1309 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 261.11(b), 261.30-261.33 (1986), or they are found to have one of four technical characteristics . . . of hazard-ousness, see 40 C.F.R. § 261.11(a)(1). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RAINBOW FAMILY,, 695 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . . §§ 261.11 and 261.14(q) (regulating the disposal of refuse and sewage); 36 C.F.R. § 261.12(d) (prohibiting . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. KENT,, 679 F. Supp. 985 (E.D. Cal. 1987)

. . . . § 261.11(c)) and failure to remove garbage and rubbish (a violation of 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R . . . . § 261.11(d)) in a separate action, Cr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONSERVATION CHEMICAL COMPANY, B. Co. FMC, 619 F. Supp. 162 (W.D. Mo. 1985)

. . . . § 261.11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRICE, d b a s F. d b a A. G. A. ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, v. PRICE, d b a s F. d b a A. G. A., 523 F. Supp. 1055 (D.N.J. 1981)

. . . . §§ 261.11, 261.33 and Appendix VIII, and are contaminants within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 300f(6) . . .

S. WALKER, v. O. HOFFMAN, B. L. W. P. Jr. I X,, 583 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 261.11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GEMMILL, 535 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1976)

. . . places of interest and (2) for scientific experiments or other purposes requiring controlled use (§ 261.11 . . . vehicular travel (§ 261.4(i)); to close areas because of dangers from infectious animal diseases (§ 261.11 . . . (f)); and to close any area to prevent destruction to property (§ 261.11(k)). . . .

HEATH, v. ASPEN SKIING CORPORATION, a a D. R. C. V. N., 325 F. Supp. 223 (D. Colo. 1971)

. . . . § 261.11, Occupancy Trespasses, is applicable to him. . . .

GUSTINE LAND CATTLE CO. INC. ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 174 Ct. Cl. 556 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . The tract contains 261.11 acres and is considered as one parcel. . . .

D., 7 B.T.A. 483 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . assessed for 1918_$1, 661.31 One-half of $4,238.95 assessed for 1919_ 2,119.47 - 3,780.78 Deficiency- 261.11 . . .