The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 270
PUBLIC LANDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 270.10

270.10 Sections not to impair law relative to homesteads, preemptions, or grants of lands for certain purposes.—Sections 270.07 and 270.08 shall in nowise impair the law of the state relative to homesteads or preemptions, or the law relative to the granting of lands for the construction of highways, public roads and canals.

History.—s. 4, ch. 5943, 1909; RGS 1225; CGL 1770; s. 1094, ch. 19355, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 892(413); s. 38, ch. 99-13.

F.S. 270.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 270.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 270.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 270.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 270.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In BABCOCK WILCOX COMPANY, 425 B.R. 266 (E.D. La. 2010)

. . . . §§ 270.10-27 (describing RCRA Part B Permit application process). . . .

KOTLER, v. WOODS,, 620 F. Supp. 2d 366 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . § 270.10 requires a criminal defendant to make a motion challenging the composition of the jury trial . . . Faulk, 251 A.D.2d 345, 673 N.Y.S.2d 715, 716 (1998) (“By failing to comply with the requirements of CPL 270.10 . . . The Court of Appeals further held that C.P.L. § 270.10(2) applies to “all challenges to the panel, whatever . . . before the commencement of jury selection, his claims fail as a matter of state law under C.P.L. § 270.10 . . . Indeed, petitioner does not dispute that he failed to make the required motion under C.P.L. § 270.10. . . .

In K. BENDER A., 373 B.R. 25 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2007)

. . . additional $360 available to creditors which they sought to divert to charitable organizations, as well as $270.10 . . .

CEMENT KILN RECYCLING COALITION, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY L., 493 F.3d 207 (D.C. Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 270.10(0, 270.32(b)(3). . . . Id. § 270.10(i). . . . A The Coalition objects to § 270.10(Z) on three grounds. . . . Id. § 270.10(l). . . . Appendix 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 § 270.10 General application requirements. (1) If the Director concludes, . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES, INC. C. Jr. C. C. Jr. A. v. F. H., 32 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Va. 1999)

. . . . §§ 270.1(b) and 270.10(b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. POWER ENGINEERING COMPANY, J. v. LILIENTHAL,, 10 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Colo. 1998)

. . . . §§ 265.1(b), 270.10(e). . . . U.S.C. § 6930(a)] and/or failed to file Part A of the permit application as required by 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . . hazardous jjyaste facility in 1980, did not file a Part A permit application as required by 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . .

S. BRYANT, v. J. SPECKARD,, 929 F. Supp. 640 (W.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . The motion was denied pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10(2), on the grounds that a . . . New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10(2) states, in pertinent part, that "[a] challenge to the panel . . .

SYSTECH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, NATIONAL CEMENT COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 55 F.3d 1466 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 270.10(b), 270.11(d). . . . Section 270.10(a) mandates that any person required to have a permit must submit an application. . . . Section 270.10(b), however, contains an exception to this rule, which applies here: “When a facility . . . EPA’s interpretation of section 270.10 is clear. All owners and operators must have permits. . . . Therefore Tejón, as an owner, must at a minimum sign National’s permit application per section 270.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION,, 38 F.3d 862 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 270.10, but is a requirement imposed upon interim status facilities. . . . .

THERMALKEM, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 25 F.3d 1233 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . . §§ 270.10(g), 270.70, and 270.72. . . .

UNITED STATES v. EKCO HOUSEWARES, INC., 853 F. Supp. 975 (N.D. Ohio 1994)

. . . . § 270.10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEUER, UNITED STATES v. HOLDERNESS,, 4 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 270.1(b), 270.10(f), and may not commence construction or engage in any hazardous waste activities . . . until the permit is received, 42 U.S.C. § 6925(a); 40 C.F.R. §§ 270.1(c), 270.10(f). . . . change which subjected it to an RCRA permit requirement. 42 U.S.C. § 6925(e)(1); 40 C.F.R. §§ 265.1(b), 270.10 . . .

J. PALUMBO, WV, v. WASTE TECHNOLOGIES INDUSTRIES, a a, 989 F.2d 156 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 270.10(b) and 270.-40(a). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION,, 829 F. Supp. 1023 (N.D. Ind. 1993)

. . . Section 270.10 and 329 IAC 3-34-1 (Exh. 1, Complaint, ¶ 78; Answer, ¶ 78). 75. . . . Title 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 provides that a state which has received Phase II final authorization to administer . . . Defendant failed to submit a Part B permit application as requested by IDEM pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . . Pursuant to Section 3005(a) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6925(a) and 40 C.F.R. §§ 270.-1(b), 270.10 and 329 IAC . . .

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. D. WATKINS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, UDALL, v. D. WATKINS, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, v. D. WATKINS,, 969 F.2d 1122 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 270.10(e)(1), 270.73(d). . . .

UNITED STATES v. EASTERN OF NEW JERSEY, INC., 770 F. Supp. 964 (D.N.J. 1991)

. . . . §§ 266.34(c) and 270.10(e) and N.J.A.C. 7:26-12.3. Amended Complaint, P 67-68. . . .

SEWELL PLASTICS, INC. v. COCA- COLA COMPANY USA Co. Co. N. C. Co. Co. Co. Co., 720 F. Supp. 1196 (W.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . 136.52 Owens-Illinois 0.00 0.00 Carolina Packaging 65.48 65.48 PSP 0.14 0.14 Amoco 0.00 0.00 Total 270.10 . . . * 270.10* 1986 SEC 295.36 295.35 Sewell 45.43 45.43 PSP 22.54 22.54 Carolina Packaging 98.70 98.43 Owens-Illinois . . .

WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ILLINOIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, V. G., 714 F. Supp. 340 (N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . . §§ 270.10(e)(4), 270.-14. . . .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EPA v. ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE CONTROL, INC. d b a W. A., 710 F. Supp. 1172 (N.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . . §§ 270.10, 270.70(a). . . .

UNITED STATES v. T S BRASS AND BRONZE WORKS, INC., 681 F. Supp. 314 (D.S.C. 1988)

. . . . § 270.10. . . . required to have been submitted by T & S to EPA by November 19, 1980, under RCRA § 3005(e) and 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONSERVATION CHEMICAL COMPANY OF ILLINOIS B., 660 F. Supp. 1236 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . . § 270.10, on November 18, 1980, the defendants submitted the first part (“Part A”) of an application . . .

VINELAND CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 810 F.2d 402 (3d Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 270.10(e)(5), 124.71-124.91 (1986). . . .

In COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING CO. INC. COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, In COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING CO. INC. OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 805 F.2d 1175 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 270.1-.2, 270.10-.73. . . . See 40 C.F.R. §§ 270.1(b), 270.10(e). . . . final permitting within the time provided is grounds for the termination of interim status. 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . .

D. WILSON, v. A. UTTARO,, 623 F. Supp. 1158 (W.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . state criminal proceeding, by way of a written objection pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 . . . to collateral federal habeas review if he brings a timely challenge to the jury panel under C.P.L. § 270.10 . . .

In PROFESSIONAL SALES CORP. UNITED STATES v. PROFESSIONAL SALES CORP., 56 B.R. 753 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . . §§ 270.2, 270.10, 270.70-270.73. . . . application under § 6925(e)(1)(C) so as to trigger the availability of interim status. 40 C.F.R. §§ 270.1, 270.10 . . . or to furnish the information in full, is grounds for termination of the interim status. 40 C.F.R. § 270.10 . . .

In COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, INC., 58 B.R. 608 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1985)

. . . . §§ 270.2, 270.10, 270.70-270.73 (1984). . . . Id. §§ 270.1, and 270.10(e). . . .

In PROFESSIONAL SALES CORPORATION, d b a PROFESSIONAL SALES CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, 48 B.R. 651 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . . §§ 270.10 and 270.13. . . .

ALBURQUERQUE, v. BARA,, 628 F.2d 767 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . in Supreme Court, Queens County, Alburquerque, in accordance with New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 . . . This is manifest in the plain language of Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 which distinguishes between . . . Alburquerque has complied with the “facts” requirement of Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 because he . . . Those cases do not involve adherence to the requirements of Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10; rather, . . . New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 provides: 1. . . . I agree with the majority that the procedural requirements of New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10 . . . Under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.10, such an objection is required to be made before the selection . . . Appellant made a timely objection before the trial commenced, and complied with § 270.10. . . .