Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE OLYMPIA OFFICE LLC,, 562 B.R. 8 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Law § 270.20 (McKinney 2016) (a party may object to a prospective juror on the ground that the juror . . .

LUGO, v. LaVALLEY,, 601 F. App'x 46 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Law § 270.20(l)(c), which provides that a prospective juror is challengeable for cause if, inter alia . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERRON,, 18 F. Supp. 3d 214 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Penal Law § 270.20 (McKinney).) . . .

PARKER, v. PHILLIPS,, 717 F. Supp. 2d 310 (W.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 270.20(l)(f), which provides for pre-trial “death qualification” of jurors in capital cases. . . . that the defendant had “failed to overcome the presumption of constitutionality with respect to CPL 270.20 . . . (l)(b) and 270.20(l)(f) and erroneously denied his challenges for cause to eight prospective jurors. . . . Fourteenth Amendments, and under New York Civil Rights Law § 12 and New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.20 . . . In New York, C.P.L § 270.20(l)(f) allows a challenge for cause on the ground that “[t]he crime charged . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. VAN HAZEL,, 468 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D.N.C. 2006)

. . . Jury Inst.Crim. 270.20, pp. 1-2; see also 18 U.S.C. § 13(a). . . . Crim. 270.20, p. 2 ¶ (A); see also N.C. Gen.Stat. § 20-4.01(48b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MALIKE,, 141 F. App'x 25 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . The Court also relied on New York Penal Law 270.20 making it illegal to wear a bulletproof vest while . . . Explosive Materials; Prohibited Transactions Involving Explosive Materials, and on New York Penal Law 270.20 . . . 2K1.3(a)(3) by analogy, because he never actually purchased explosives, and on New York Penal Law § 270.20 . . . The District Court’s reliance on U.S.S.G. § 2K1.3(a)(3) and New York Penal Law 270.20 is not clear, given . . . New York Penal Law § 270.20 provides: "A person is guilty of the unlawful wearing of a body vest when . . .

ALFINI, v. LORD,, 245 F. Supp. 2d 493 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Law § 270.20(l)(b). . . . New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 270.20 states that a challenge for cause may be made if a prospective . . .

FLORES, v. P. KEANE,, 211 F. Supp. 2d 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . For one thing, under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 270.20(2), a ruling denying a challenge for cause . . . Pro. § 270.20; see also People v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TORRES, El A. NFN J. T., 128 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . Law § 270.20(1) (McKinney 1993); Tex. Crim. P.Code Ann. § 35.16 (West 1989). . . . .

BARBIERI, v. HARTSDALE POST OFFICE,, 856 F. Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . While individual claims such as that here for $270.20 are small, in the aggregate the effect of how the . . . form complaint pro se in the Small Claims Court of the Town of Greenburgh on April 11, 1994 seeking $270.20 . . . Barbieri’s $270.20 claim to the rubbish heap because of his procedural ignorance would not be “worthy . . .

In BURNS, A. BURNS H. v. BURNS,, 149 B.R. 578 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1993)

. . . Charles Co. 4,238.62 131.54 #37427 (11/90) (Cosignor w/Michael)-BFG Federal 11,945.00 270.20 Credit Union . . .

Co. v., 14 Ct. Int'l Trade 458 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)

. . . L. 89-651: 270.15 Books printed wholly or chiefly in languages other than English.Free 270.20 Books ( . . .

OUTLET BOOK CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 743 F. Supp. 881 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)

. . . eliminated by Pub.L. 89-651: 270.15 Books printed wholly or chiefly in languages other than English.Free 270.20 . . .

KRINSK, v. FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. Co. CMA, 715 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . . § 270.20(a)-l (making the proxy rules promulgated pursuant to § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF CHICAGO,, 621 F. Supp. 1296 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . Applicants for state projects receiving less than 60 points are rendered ineligible for funding. (34 C.F.R. 270.20 . . . (Coates Dep. at 40-46; Winkler Dep. at 33-37, 95-98; 34 C.F.R. § 270.20). . . . the Secretary could have, under existing criteria recognizing the factor of needs, see 34 C.F.R. §§ 270.20 . . .