Cases from cite.case.law:

TOWN OF EAST TROY, a v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY,, 653 F.2d 1123 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . have been implying by its “special injury” language that the city would also lack standing under § 280.01 . . . Section 280.01 read: “Any person may maintain an action to recover damages for and to abate a private . . . Had the Court expressly considered § 280.01 and had it concluded that the city was a “person,” then its . . . without that it can not bring an action to restrain either a private or public nuisance under Sec. 280.01 . . . La Crosse Theaters, however, does not hold that a § 280.01 plaintiff must have property affected by the . . .

W. POWERS, v. UNITED STATES, 390 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1968)

. . . United States, 103 F.Supp. 119 (W.D.Pa.1952); see Jayson, Federal Tort Claims §§ 275.01, 280.01 (1966 . . .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DALLAS ESTATE, 110 F.2d 743 (2d Cir. 1940)

. . . IQ on June 15, 1934 and $280.01 on December 15, 1934. . . . related back to the filing of the original petition, and that consequently the last installment of tax, $280.01 . . . petition to the Board was filed within two years from the payment of the last installment of tax, $280.01 . . .