Cases from cite.case.law:

RAMCHAIR, v. CONWAY,, 601 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . New York Criminal Procedure Law (“CPL”) § 280.10. . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. B. FLOWERS, LLC, APAC-, 423 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . practicable steps have been taken which will minimize potential adverse impacts of the discharge.” 40 C.F.R. 280.10 . . .

LABARBERA, v. C. VOLANTE CORP. C., 164 F. Supp. 2d 321 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . . § 1132(g)(1), and $280.10 per diem interest from July 19, 2001, until the date judgment is entered. . . .

RAYMOND K. HOXSIE REAL ESTATE TRUST, K. W. v. EXXON EDUCATION FOUNDATION, J. F., 81 F. Supp. 2d 359 (D.R.I. 2000)

. . . . § 280.10(a) (1999). . . .

A. M. v., 113 T.C. 6 (T.C. 1999)

. . . Tax Court entered a stipulated decision in the estate tax case, setting the value of the stock at $280.10 . . .

DYDIO, v. HESSTON CORPORATION,, 887 F. Supp. 1037 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . . § 280.10(a). . . . Nor has Hesston attempted to avoid the language of 40 C.F.R. § 280.12(b) and § 280.10(a) under which . . .

WINSTON, B. W. Co- v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a P. K. M. D., 861 F. Supp. 713 (C.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . . § 280.10(b) states that the following UST systems are excluded from the requirements of this part: . . .

UNITED STATES v. COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF PEORIA, G. O, 874 F.2d 1165 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . This proposal would result in an increase in the agreed value of the corporation’s shares to $280.10 . . . gains from the corporation's liquidation, basing their new calculations upon a “stepped-up” basis of $280.10 . . .

A. CARTER, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD,, 834 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 280.10(a). . . .

G. O BRIEN, v. UNITED STATES, 766 F.2d 1038 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . stipulated order on April 9,1980, setting the value of the stock on the date of Joseph O’Brien’s death at $280.10 . . .

HAMEED f k a f k a v. W. JONES,, 750 F.2d 154 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 280.10 Motion for mistrial At any time during the trial, the court must declare a mistrial and order . . . defendant and the people all consent to such discharge; or (c) A mistrial is declared pursuant to section 280.10 . . .

G. O BRIEN, v. UNITED STATES, 582 F. Supp. 203 (C.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . remained pending until April 9, 1980, when the Tax Court entered a stipulated order fixing the value at $280.10 . . . claim was based on the differential between the $215.7796 claimed in 1975, as his cost basis, and the $280.10 . . .

UNITED STATES DRAYTON, v. F. HAYES, a UNITED STATES McQUEEN, v. F. HAYES, a, 451 F. Supp. 339 (E.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . Justice Held and petitioner McQueen’s counsel were fully aware of Section 280.10 of the New York Criminal . . .

D. NESBITT, v. UNITED STATES a L. T., 445 F. Supp. 824 (N.D. Cal. 1978)

. . . The City also holds a judgment against Brann in the amount of $280.10, an abstract of which was recorded . . .