Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 288.30 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 288.30 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 288.30

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 288
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 288.30
288.30 Cumulative provisions.Sections 288.23, 288.24, 288.27, 288.28, and 288.29 are intended to be cumulative of other powers granted to the Division of Bond Finance and the Department of Transportation under other provisions of law and are not intended to repeal, abrogate, or modify any such provisions.
History.s. 6, ch. 23758, 1947; s. 11, ch. 29788, 1955; ss. 22, 23, 35, ch. 69-106.
Note.Former s. 420.17.

F.S. 288.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 288.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 288.30


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 288.30
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 288.30.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FIRST MIDWEST BANK, D. a v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 337 F. Supp. 3d 749 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . Attorney from Romanucci & Blandin: Antonio Romanucci $750 2021.55 $1,516,162.50 Stephan Blandin $750 288.30 . . . Attorney from Romanucci & Blandin: Antonio Romanucci $550 1,739.67 $956,818.50 Stephan Blandin $450 288.30 . . .

STATE v. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION,, 143 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1962)

. . . . §§ 288.23, 288.26-288.30, inaugurated what might be called a new era in county road and bridge construction . . .

P. C. LISSENDEN CO. a a v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, a, 116 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1959)

. . . Hime Electric Company, to Plaintiff, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., the sum of $17,-288.30 for materials . . . “Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgment againsl Defendants in the sum of $17,-288.30.” . . . .

E. HUGHES v. UNITED STATES, 144 F. Supp. 855 (E.D.N.Y. 1956)

. . . He filed claims for refunds on his 1942 and 1943 income taxes in the sums of $92.11 and $288.30 respectively . . .