Cases from cite.case.law:

STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, v., 919 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . § 292.16, than the one requiring the “entire application record” to be sent to the concurring governor . . . the regulations to avoid the confusion noted by the comment and amended the language of 25 C.F.R. § 292.16 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PARK, 536 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . The scenic easement at issue in Racine was specific, stating that “ ‘[w]ith reference to 36 C.F.R. 292.16 . . . We held that the “only consistent reading” was to allow the structures permitted by § 292.16(g)(1) to . . .

NEAR, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,, 259 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (E.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . . § 292.16(g)(1) [which provided for structures necessary for dude ranching], it is agreed that only . . .

F. RACINE, Jr. B. v. UNITED STATES R., 858 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 292.16(g)(1) (1987) which allows on private land “structures which do not substantially impair or . . . The scenic easement provides, “[w]ith reference to 36 C.F.R. § 292.16(g)(1), it is agreed that only one . . . As noted above, the scenic easement on Racine’s property provides “[w]ith reference to 36 C.F.R. 292.16 . . . Section 292.16(g)(1), incorporated by reference into the easement, permits structures “necessary for . . . to interpret the easement as the Secretary did, we would be forced to ignore the language in section 292.16 . . .

C. DOUGLAS WILSON CO. a v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, St. St., 464 F. Supp. 1 (D.S.C. 1977)

. . . Credit Instrument” to the FHA in which the date and amount of each advance and total advances of $818,-292.16 . . .

WALCUTT BROTHERS CO., 1 B.T.A. 910 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . By letter of December 4,1924, the Commissioner determined a deficiency for 1919 of $292.16, ar. overassessment . . .