Cases from cite.case.law:

BRENNAN, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 146 So. 3d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . wartime did not preclude his entitlement to a lieutenant’s promotional preference, pursuant to section 295.09 . . . Rule 55A-7.0111, Florida Administrative Code, which implemented section 295.09, Florida Statutes (2012 . . . Neither is the City’s requirement consistent with rule 55A-7.0111 and section 295.09. . . . Brennan was not required to submit his 2003 DD-214 form with his job application, pursuant to section 295.09 . . . Section 295.09 provides as follows: Reinstatement or reemployment; promotion preference. . . .

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY, v. FUQUA,, 136 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 295.07-295.09, Fla. Stat. (2012). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C). . . .

CITY OF DELAND, v. LANDOLFI,, 97 So. 3d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . rules adopted by the commission, determines that a violation of s. 295.07, s. 295.08, s. 295.085, or s. 295.09 . . . employee, or officer of the state to comply with the provisions of s. 295.07, s. 295.08, s. 295.085, or s. 295.09 . . . (l)(a) or (b); and, in the event of a violation of s. 295.07, s. 295.08, s. 295.085, or s. 295.09(l)( . . . (referring only to section 295.09(l)(a) and (b)). . . .

KELLER, Jr. v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION,, 691 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Keller relies on section 295.09, Florida Statutes (1995) as the basis for his entitlement to a preference . . . : 295.09 Reinstatement or reemployment; promotion preference (l)(a) When an employee of the state or . . .

RAMIREZ, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 627 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 295.09, Fla.Stat. (1977) (emphasis added). . . . Instead, he argues that the amendment to section 295.09 took effect during the life of the promotional . . . Ramirez was not entitled to veteran’s preference points under section 295.09, Florida Statutes (1977) . . . Section 295.09, Florida Statutes (1979), provided for the award of preference points “on promotional . . . In Burmeister, the court focused on the version of section 295.09 in effect when the employee took the . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, a v. G. BURMEISTER,, 512 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Prior to 1978, section 295.09 provided that the preference points would be awarded only to certain veterans . . . apply only to a veteran's first promotion after reinstatement or reemployment, without exception.” § 295.09 . . . Section 295.09(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1985), is a clear expression of the legislative intent to award . . .

C. STEVENS, D. v. CITY OF MIAMI D., 500 So. 2d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . signed because they were unaware at the time they executed it of the “veterans preference” in-Section 295.09 . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, v. FARRINGTON, CITY OF MIAMI, v. R. JOYCE,, 405 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Rezeau, 62 So.2d 726 (Fla. 1952); § 295.14(2), Fla.Stat. (1980); § 295.09, Fla.Stat. (1978). . . .

A. YATES, Jr. a E. A. v. PALMINTIERO,, 96 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1957)

. . . appointment and reemployment, and in retention of position, then specified in companion sections, 295.08 and 295.09 . . .

YATES v. REZEAU, 62 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1952)

. . . as the Civil Service Board of the City of Miami, have properly interpreted the provisions of Section 295.09 . . . Section 295.09 requires municipalities and other designated public bodies whose employees are under a . . . We hold, then, that the provisions of Section 295.09, when interpreted consistently with the legislative . . .