Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. REINHART,, 893 F.3d 606 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . possession of child pornography and sexual exploitation of child, in violation of California Penal Code §§ 311.11 . . . Relying on this district court's prior case law, the court held that California Penal Code § 311.11(a . . . The district court also found that § 311.11(a) was indivisible. . . . California Penal Code § 311.11(a) Reinhart was previously convicted under California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . Penal Code § 311.11(a). . . .

ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY US HOLDINGS INC. LLC,, 706 F. App'x 987 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . Id. col. 311.11-14. . . .

CHAVEZ- SOLIS, v. E. LYNCH,, 803 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . decide whether a conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . We conclude that § 311.11(a) sweeps in a broader range of pornographic depictions than the federal child . . . We conclude that § 311.11(a) is indeed broader in this regard. . . . Cal.Penal Code § 311.11(a). . . . (a)); Special Jury Instruction 311.11(a) #4, People v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. McELMURRY,, 776 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . In 2007 McElmurry had pleaded guilty to violating CaLPenal Code § 311.11 (possession or control of matter . . .

P. SHOEMAKER, v. TAYLOR,, 730 F.3d 778 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . eight misdemeanor counts of possession of child pornography in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . Proceedings Shoemaker was charged with possession of child pornography under California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . pubic or rectal area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer” under California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . California Penal Code § 311.11 makes it a crime for a person to "knowingly possess[ ] or control[] any . . .

AGUILAR- TURCIOS, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 691 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . had his conduct occurred off-base, he could have been prosecuted under either California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . Aguilar-Turcios pled guilty to a violation of California's child pornography statute, Cal.Penal Code § 311.11 . . . would have no reservations applying the categorical and modified categorical analysis to determine if § 311.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHRISTY,, 810 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D.N.M. 2011)

. . . intercourse — California Penal Code § 261.5; (viii) possession of child pornography — California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . See also CaLPenal Code § 311.11 (“Every person who knowingly possesses or controls any matter ... the . . . California Penal Code § 261.5; (viii) possession of child pornography, see California Penal Code § 311.11 . . .

In U. S. INSURANCE GROUP, LLC, P. Jr. v. LP,, 451 B.R. 437 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2011)

. . . LLC_Check_Full_Nov. 30, 2008_Dec. 4, 2008 $ 9,333.33 AIR, LLC_Check_Partial_Dec. 31, 2009_Jan. 7, 2009 $ 311.11 . . . means (some by wire, others by check), varied greatly in amount (ranging from a meager payment of $311.11 . . .

AGUILAR- TURCIOS, v. H. HOLDER Jr., 582 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . had his conduct occurred off-base, he could have been prosecuted under either California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . Penal Code § 311.11, the panel would have no reservations applying the categorical and modified categorical . . . analysis to determine if § 311.11 was an aggravated felony. . . .

CAMPBELL LLP, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, a, 253 F.R.D. 586 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . I (AICPA § 311.11) (“Supervision involves directing the efforts of assistants who are involved in accomplishing . . . I (AICPA § 311.11). . . .

ARMIJO, v. B. MUKASEY,, 266 F. App'x 511 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . The BIA found that a conviction under CPC section 311.11(a) was an aggravated felony for the purposes . . . We agree with the BIA that a conviction for possession of child pornography under CPC section 311.11( . . . Doing so, we agree with the BIA that the essential elements of CPC section 311.11 and those of 18 U.S.C . . . See CPC § 311.11(a) (1999); 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B); see also United States v. . . . CPC § 311.11(a) (1999) (emphasis added). . . .

C. ALVA, v. LOCKYER, L., 220 F. App'x 621 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 1983 action seeking a declaration that California Penal Code section 311.11 — which criminalizes . . . Section 311.11’s prohibition on possessing material containing simulated sexual conduct involving minors . . . Alva’s Fourteenth Amendment equal protection challenge to section 311.11(d)’s exception for “any film . . . Section 311.11(d) implicates neither a fundamental right, nor a suspect class, and is therefore subject . . . Alva presents no argument beyond the accusation that section 311.11(d) was the “obvious result of heavy . . .

SANTOS SANCHEZ, v. HOSPITAL MENONITA DE CAYEY, INC. v. Dr., 218 F.R.D. 12 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . information, and to respond to third-party defendants’ request for a discovery meeting under Local Rule 311.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLUMENTHAL,, 71 F. App'x 735 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . § 311.3 or depiction of sexual conduct of a person under 18 in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11 . . . together, provide fair probability that evidence of a violation of California Penal Code § 311.3 or § 311.11 . . .

De ORTIZ- RIVERA, v. MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF TOA ALTA,, 214 F.R.D. 51 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . Defendants claim that they sent a communication dated September 16, 2002 per the provisions of Local rule 311.11 . . . acknowledge the September 17, 2002, discussion but claim that Defendants misinterpret that as a Local Rule 311.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN U. S. CURRENCY,, 217 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D.P.R. 2002)

. . . Accordingly, Claimant has annexed a statement of uncontested facts, pursuant to Local Rule 311.11: 16 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DAVIDSON,, 246 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Penal Code § 311.11(a). . . . Penal Code § 311.11(a). . . . Penal Code § 311.11(a) (West 1996). . . . Penal Code § 311.11(d) (West 1995). . . . The 1996 amended version of Title 9, § 311.11 of the California Penal Code reads: § 311.11 Possession . . .

A. ACOSTA- VEGA, v. BROWN,, 14 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D.P.R. 1998)

. . . Once remanded, the parties held a Rule 311.11 meeting on April 11, 1997. . . . the nineteen months since this case was remanded, independent of plaintiffs claims of several failed 311.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. H. KOURI- PEREZ, 8 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D.P.R. 1998)

. . . litigation dispute resolution mechanism, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 15(d); Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), and Looal Rule 311.11 . . .

V. MIRANDA, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES,, 176 F.R.D. 438 (D.P.R. 1998)

. . . On April 8, 1997, pursuant to Local Rule 311.11, American served upon counsel for the plaintiffs a notice . . .

A. M NDEZ MARRERO, v. TOLEDO,, 968 F. Supp. 27 (D.P.R. 1997)

. . . They also claimed that Toledo’s counsel was unavailable for a 311.11 conference. . . . They also made no mention of a 311.11 conference with Díaz Colón. . . . or Díaz Colón to respond to the discovery requests, and there is no evidence that they ever sought a 311.11 . . . Local Rule 311.11 provides that before a party files a motion regarding a discovery dispute, the movant . . . Any motion regarding a discovery dispute which fails to state that the parties have had a 311.11 conference . . .

REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, v. SEBELEN,, 959 F. Supp. 553 (D.P.R. 1997)

. . . The Court denied that motion on November 27, 1995, for failure to comply with Rule 311.11. . . .

AYALA- GERENA, v. BRISTOL MYERS- SQUIBB COMPANY, d b a, 95 F.3d 86 (1st Cir. 1996)

. . . See Local Rule 311.11. . . . See Local Rule 311.11. . . . Not only is it undisputed that the parties’ Local Rule 311.11 meeting was not held until February 1, . . . We remind Appellants that Local Rule 311.11 expressly prohibits the court from entertaining any motion . . . See Local Rule 311.11. . . .

In AMEZAGA, ARP SEVERAL AIR CARRIERS, v. AMEZAGA,, 195 B.R. 221 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1996)

. . . Furthermore, defendants allege “that Duffy’s failure to prosecute in good shape and to comply with Local Rule 311.11 . . . Duffy’s violation of Local Rule 311.11 is unsubstantiated. . . . Local Rule 311.11 requires that counsel meet to discuss the terms of discovery in an effort to forge . . . Rule 311.11 provides: Except as provided for in Rule 37(j), FRCP, and prior to filing of any motion or . . .

LEON LOPEZ, v. CORPORACION INSULAR SEGUROS,, 742 F. Supp. 44 (D.P.R. 1990)

. . . of ten months, the plaintiff placed numerous phone calls, requests for conferences under Local Rule 311.11 . . .

ORTIZ MERCADO, v. PUERTO RICO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC., 736 F. Supp. 1207 (D.P.R. 1990)

. . . See Local Rule 311.11. . Mr. . . .

MARSHALL, v. F. W. WOOLWORTH, INC., 122 F.R.D. 117 (D.P.R. 1988)

. . . hold a conference within the next ten days to discuss the discovery problems pursuant to Local Rule 311.11 . . .

v., 59 T.C. 91 (T.C. 1972)

. . . 9,644.00 (c) Cost of machinery_ 94,033.66 - 333,141. 84 Consolidated taxable income adjusted_ 234, 311.11 . . .

CORNGOLD, v. UNITED STATES, 367 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1966)

. . . United States, supra, 329 F.2d at 856 “Postal Manual Regulation 311.11 provides: ‘Mail other than first . . .

SANTANA, v. UNITED STATES, 329 F.2d 854 (1st Cir. 1964)

. . . Whereas Postal Manual Regulation 311.11 provides: “Mail other than first class mail may be opened for . . .

SECURITIES INVESTING FUND, INC., 1 B.T.A. 279 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Shares of stock of Philadelphia Co. 48,552/59,427 of $76,231.22__ 62,281. 09 1, 546, 311.11 8.Error in . . .