Cases from cite.case.law:

RIDLEY, v. SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION,, 693 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Addison, this Court explained: At issue here is respondent’s alleged violation of a statute, section 316.1575 . . .

SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ADDISON,, 502 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 1987)

. . . trial showed that the train blew its whistle prior to entering the crossing as required by section 316.1575 . . . Seaboard argued that the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the requirements of section 316.1575 . . . At issue here is respondent’s alleged violation of a statute, section 316.1575(l)(c), part of the Florida . . . Sub judice, Seaboard’s main defense was that it sounded the audible warning required by section 316.1575 . . . surmise that the trial court’s refusal to give an instruction on respondent’s violation of section 316.1575 . . .

SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ADDISON,, 481 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . The trial court refused to give certain instructions requested by Seaboard as to Sections 316.1575 and . . . Section 316.1575 obligates a driver to stop within 15' of railroad tracks when a train blows its whistle . . . With regard to Section 316.1575, this statute requires nothing more than that a motorist stop before . . .

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 545 F. Supp. 595 (S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . Plaintiffs contend the local ordinance is in conflict with Florida Statute § 316.1575 which requires . . .

ST. LOUIS- SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. P. WHITE,, 369 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . For example, charges incorporating complex statutes such as Section 316.1575, Florida Statutes (1977) . . .