Cases from cite.case.law:

ARAJ v. RENFRO, AS GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF J. JONES,, 260 So. 3d 1121 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . court sustained the objection, instead giving the jury instruction requested by Jones based on section 316.183 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINKHAM, Sr., 896 F.3d 133 (1st Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 316.183(7), 775.082(5), 775.083(1)(e). . . .

UNITED STATES v. NAHMANI,, 696 F. App'x 457 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 316.183(1), making the initial stop lawful. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARNES,, 596 F. App'x 821 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 316.183(1). . . .

AGREDA, v. STATE, 152 So. 3d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 316.183(2). . . . driven at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal flow of traffic in violation of section 316.183 . . .

A. BIRGE, v. D. CHARRON,, 107 So. 3d 350 (Fla. 2012)

. . . See, e.g., § 316.183(5), Fla. Stat. (2012) (State Uniform Traffic Control Law). . . .

GONZALEZ v. B. ROSE, II,, 752 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Under Florida Statutes section 316.183(1), no person shall drive a vehicle on a street, highway, or road . . .

D. CRAIG v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,, 679 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Appellants next argue that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on section 316.183( . . . Section 316.183(2) & (3) provided: 316.183 Unlawful speed. (2) On all streets or highways, the maximum . . . Appellants counter that section 316.183(3) established a maximum speed limit of 30 miles per hour for . . . To gauge the statutory purpose behind section 316.183(3), it is proper to trace the evolution of the . . . (codified at § 316.183(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994 )). . . .

SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, a v. RIDLEY, 666 So. 2d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . instruct the jury pursuant to Florida Standard Jury Instruction 4.11 in reference to violations of section 316.183 . . .

YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF TAMPA, INC. a A. v. PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 643 So. 2d 78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . to Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 4.11, based upon violations of Florida Statute Sections 316.183 . . . (1), concerning unlawful speed, 316.183(4), pertaining to special hazards, and 316.1925(1), careless . . . been reasonable for the jury to have found that Johnson’s speed constituted a violation of section 316.183 . . . found that Johnson’s failure to slow down or switch traffic lanes constituted a violation of section 316.183 . . .

STATE v. JOY,, 637 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Travelling at an unlawful speed is a violation of section 316.183, Florida Statutes (1991). . . .

GULLEY, v. PIERCE, a a, 625 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . vehicle to stop when approaching an intersection where traffic lights are inoperative; (2) Section 316.183 . . . Finally, we agree that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that a violation of section 316.183 . . . flashing caution signal should proceed through the intersection only with caution, and that of section 316.183 . . .

GRIEFER B. v. DiPIETRO a k a a k a J. a k a a k a No a k a, 625 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . court erred in refusing to give appellants’ requested instruction on unlawful speed based on section 316.183 . . .

A. ROBINSON S. v. W. GERARD B., 611 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Florida Statute § 316.183 UNLAWFUL SPEED states: “No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed . . . instruction in particular, the court apparently agreed with the defendants’ arguments that Section 316.183 . . . Although the existence of such hazards is a factor to be considered under section 316.183(1), relating . . . Nor do we agree with appellees’ argument that section 316.183(1) does not apply under the circumstances . . .

C. SOTUYO, v. WILLIAMS,, 587 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . 4.11 regarding alleged violations of the Florida Uniform Traffic Control Law, specifically section 316.183 . . . instructions pursuant to Florida Standard Jury Instruction 4.11 in reference to violations of section 316.183 . . . Section 316.183(1) provides that [n]o person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than . . . reasonably infer, because of appellee’s failure to decrease his speed, that a violation of section 316.183 . . .

ESTATE OF WALLACE, v. FISHER,, 567 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Jury Instruction 4.11 that if the jury found that the nominal plaintiff Linda violated either section 316.183 . . .

STATE v. EADY,, 538 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See § 316.183(1), Fla.Stat. (1987) (“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater . . .

W. HESSEL, v. STATE, 525 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . certiorari and quash the order affirming petitioner’s traffic conviction of a violation of section 316.183 . . .

H. OLIVER A. v. S. EISENMAN,, 523 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . exceeded the lawful speed limit at the time and place of the accident proved a violation of section 316.183 . . .

SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ADDISON,, 502 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 1987)

. . . district court found the trial court’s failure to instruct on section 316.030 (careless driving) and 316.183 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. PHENEY, 21 Fla. Supp. 2d 75 (Pinellas Cty. Ct. 1986)

. . . And, while the Defendant may have exceeded a speed which was reasonable and prudent, contrary to F.S. 316.183 . . .

SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ADDISON,, 481 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . trial court refused to give certain instructions requested by Seaboard as to Sections 316.1575 and 316.183 . . . railroad tracks when a train blows its whistle 1500' from the crossing and is an immediate hazard; Section 316.183 . . . jury instructions as reflected in the record clearly encompass the requested instruction on Section 316.183 . . .

ELLIOT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 8 Fla. Supp. 2d 54 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1983)

. . . , the court finds that the Defendant was in fact charged, tried and convicted under Florida Statute 316.183 . . .

R. BURLESON v. J. FEALLOCK, III,, 417 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The evidence does not support a finding of a violation of Sections 316.183(4) and 316.185, Florida Statutes . . .

W. R. LINDSEY, a v. E. JOHNSON, 415 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety; (5) that 316.183 . . . except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with the law; (6) that § 316.183 . . .

STATE v. DuPONT,, 399 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . only applies to Part III of the Traffic Rules entitled “Criminal Offenses” and a violation of section 316.183 . . . Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(c)(1)(A). . § 316.183(2), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . . § 316.183(2), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . .

YOLMAN, v. STATE, 388 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1980)

. . . subsequently amended to sixty-one, miles per hour in a thirty-five-mile-per-hour zone in violation of section 316.183 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLOCK, 452 F. Supp. 907 (M.D. Fla. 1978)

. . . . § 316.183, which together with Fla.Stat. § 316.187(1) provides that the maximum speed limit for vehicles . . . The Court holds therefore that, under the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 316.183 (via 18 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 13 . . . The absence of reported decisions interpreting Fla.Stat. § 316.183 does not mean that its meaning was . . .

STATE v. LEE, STATE v. G. JULIO,, 356 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1978)

. . . .-159, 316.162, 316.181, 316.182, 316.183, 316.-184, 316.185, 316.186, 316.196, 316.197, 316.-198, 316.205 . . .

KOMINSKY, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). .Florida Statute 316.183(2) (e). . . .

MENARD W. v. O MALLEY,, 327 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 316.183, “Unlawful speed” was not error. . . .