Cases from cite.case.law:

CASSERLY, v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,, 228 So. 3d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The circuit court reasoned that sections 316.0085 and 316.2065(11), Florida Statutes (2014), when read . . . The plaintiff primarily argues the circuit court erred by ruling that sections 316.0085 and 316.2065( . . . the extent he argues that section 316.0085 may be read on its own without consideration of section 316.2065 . . . In any event, to the extent the' circuit court’s ruling may have implicitly recognized that section 316.2065 . . . Section 316.2065(11) provides: No person upon roller skates, or riding in or by means of any coaster, . . . It concluded that the City was not liable as a matter of law based on section 316.2065, Florida Statutes . . . The City moved to dismiss based upon sections 316.0085 and 316.2065, Florida Statutes. . . . It argued that inline skating or rollerblading upon a roadway was prohibited under section 316.2065(11 . . . s ruling held as a matter of law that the City was not liable based upon a' reading of both section 316.2065 . . . Section 316.2065, entitled “Bicycle regulations[,]” is part of the Florida Uniform Traffic Control Law . . .

MONTANEZ, v. CITY OF ORLANDO,, 678 F. App'x 905 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 316.2065(19) (characterizing violations of the statute as noncriminal traffic infractions). . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 203 So. 3d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 316.2065(7), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 772 F.3d 680 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 316.2065 (listing regulations for bicycles); id. § 316.073 (noting regulations for animals and animal-drawn . . .

MALCOLM, v. CITY OF MIAMI POLICE,, 574 F. App'x 881 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 316.2065, which required having a visible light on his bicycle between sunset and sunrise, on the . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERRICKS,, 572 F. App'x 753 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 316.2065(5)(a). . . . .

LANE, v. MRA HOLDINGS, LLC d b a MRA AMX LLC, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1205 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 316.2065 . See Fla. Stat. § 499.039. . See Fla. Stat. § 322.05. . See Fla. . . .

CARABALLO, v. STATE, 753 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 316.2065, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

W. L. D. a v. STATE, 724 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 316.2065(7), Fla. Stat. (1997). The officer was alone and did not draw his weapon. . . .

STATE v. WILSON,, 725 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . attempting to stop ap-pellee for operating a bicycle without lights after dark in violation of section 316.2065 . . .

D. CRAIG v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,, 679 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 316.2065(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

POPEJOY, POPEJOY, v. HARRISON, 615 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . encompassing the following two statutes: Section 316.130(15), Florida Statutes (1989), and section 316.2065 . . . Section 316.2065(10), Florida Statutes (1989), provides as follows: A person propelling a vehicle by . . .

STATE v. BANFIELD,, 614 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The two disregarded a stop sign in violation of section 316.2065(1), Florida Statutes (1991). . . . Moreover, neither bicycle was equipped with lights as required by section 316.2065(8). . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 583 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 316.2065, Florida Statutes, requires certain equipment (lights, reflectors, brakes) on bicycles . . .

POWERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 31 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . Chapter 316.2065 of the Florida Statutes is entitled “Bicycle Regulations” and contains all regulations . . .

BRANDY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 11 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . It is correct as the Appellee argues that according to F.S. 316.2065(1) the rights and duties of a bicyclist . . .

STATE v. HOWARD,, 510 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . In fact, section 316.2065(1), Fla.Stat. (1985), states that Every person propelling a vehicle by human . . . Since section 316.193 does not fall within the limited exceptions listed in section 316.2065, it is the . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. WATERS, 24 Fla. Supp. 2d 49 (Broward Cty. Ct. 1987)

. . . previously found in Section 316.111, Florida Statutes, and later transferred to and expanded in Section 316.2065 . . . criminal traffic offenses (misdemeanors) is further demonstrated by the changed language of Section 316.2065 . . . Section 316.2065 makes it clear that such devices are not “vehicles” but are subject to the statutory . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. HOWARD, 19 Fla. Supp. 2d 37 (Monroe Cty. Ct. 1986)

. . . Defendant cites 316.2065 F.S.A. which governs the operation of bicycles which does not include DUI jurisdiction . . . (c) 316.2065 F.S.A. (1985 edition) is a statute specifically provided to govern and control the use of . . . Although 316.2065 contains seventeen (17) sections mandating specific use of bicycles not one of those . . . sections addresses the problem to operate or pedal a bicycle while under the influence. 316.2065 also . . . Section 316.2065) does not include D.U.I. jurisdiction. 0) In Jimmy R. Velez v. Criterion Ins. . . .

R. VELEZ, v. CRITERION INSURANCE COMPANY,, 461 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., § 316.2065(14)-(15), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 410 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1982)

. . . violations bureau or clerk’s office: (1) One dollar for all infractions of bicycle regulations, section 316.2065 . . .

v. SINGER,, 389 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Failure to have a lamp on one’s bicycle after sundown as required by section 316.2065(9), Florida Statutes . . . argument. .MacNeil was charged with a violation of § 316.111(9), Fla.Stat. (1975), now renumbered § 316.2065 . . .

In TRAFFIC COURT RULES, 366 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1978)

. . . violations bureau or clerk’s office: (1) One dollar for all infractions of bicycle regulations, section 316.2065 . . .