The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . devices), § 316.217 (when lighted lamps are required), § 316.220 (headlamps), § 316.221 (tail-lamps), § 316.222 . . .
. . . See § 316.222, Fla. Stat. (2009). . In Origi v. . . .
. . . three brake lights were operational, this was sufficient to comply with the requirements of section 316.222 . . . Zarba’s vehicle was in compliance with section 316.222(1) — the statute requiring “[ejvery motor vehicle . . . vehicle equipped with three brake lights does not constitute a violation of the law because section 316.222 . . . See §§ 316.222(1), 316.234(1). And in Mr. . . . Section 316.222(1) refers to further detailed requirements for brake lights under section 316.234(1). . . .
. . . Burger’s car for a violation of section 316.222(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which requires “[e]very . . . Section 316.222(1) clearly provides that a motor vehicle must be equipped with two or more stop lamps . . .
. . . it, merely requires a motor vehicle in this state be “equipped with two or more stop lamps,” see § 316.222 . . . Stat. (2003), and because his vehicle literally complied with section 316.222(1), the stop was unlawful . . .
. . . . § 316.222. . . .
. . . vehicle to have two taillights visible for 1,000 feet, and inoperable brake lights contrary to section 316.222 . . . In Scott, 710 So.2d at 1379, the motorist’s turn signal was inoperable, violating sections 316.222(2) . . .
. . . statutes requiring taillamps, stop lamps, and prohibiting the obstruction of the highway, ss. 316.221, 316.222 . . .
. . . See also §§ 316.215; 316.222; 316.234, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . . § 316.222 (stop lamps and turn signals); id. § 316.2225 (additional equipment required on certain vehicles . . .
. . . one shall drive at a speed greater than is reasonable under the circumstances prevailing; (7) that 316.222 . . .