The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 316.238, and James signed the citation using a pencil. . . .
. . . did, and wrote a traffic citation for failure to dim headlights, in violation of Florida Statute § 316.238 . . . Stat. § 316.238(l)(a), (2). . . .
. . . Shumaker for failing to dim his high beams within 500 feet of oncoming traffic, in violation of section 316.238 . . . failing to dim his high beams while following within 300 feet of another vehicle, in violation of section 316.238 . . .
. . . informed the driver he had been stopped for the high beam violation, a civil infraction under section 316.238 . . .
. . . .- The appellant claims the trial court erred in finding that section 316.238, Florida Statutes (1985 . . . conclusion that reading section 316.003(43), Florida Statutes (1985), with subsection (2) of section 316.238 . . .
. . . facts, there is also no doubt that the Deputy properly stopped the Defendant for suspicion of violating 316.238 . . .
. . . The defendant is charged with D.U.I. and failing to dim headlights in violation of Section 316.238 F.S . . . Section 316.238 F.S. states: “Use of multiple-beam road lighting equipment. — Whenever a motor vehicle . . .
. . . because it failed to dim its headlights as the two cars passed on the Interstate, relying on Section 316.238 . . . The trial court granted appel-lee’s motion to suppress, finding that Section 316.238 did not require . . . It is clear from a plain reading of Section 316.238(1), Florida Statutes, in conjunction with the definitional . . . Section 316.-238(1), relied upon by the state trooper, provides as follows: 316.238 Use of multiple-beam . . . It is clear that the requirement in Section 316.238(1) that a driver dim his headlights for oncoming . . .
