Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 236 So. 3d 919 (Fla. 2018)

. . . failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances. [401.9] F.S. 316.614 . . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of F.S. 316.614, be read or paraphrased . . .

CLASSY CYCLES, INC. v. BAY COUNTY, a a, 201 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . sanitation hazards), § 316.610 (safety of vehicle), § 316.613 (child restraint requirements), and § 316.614 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOSEPH, a. k. a. a. k. a., 611 F. App'x 946 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 316.614(4)(b). Because Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GAYLE,, 608 F. App'x 783 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 316.614(4)(b) & (8). . . . Stat. § 316.614, Historical and Statutory Notes, Florida Laws 2009, c. 2009-32 § 1. . . .

JONES, v. ALAYON,, 162 So. 3d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 316.614(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1986). . . . .” § 316.614(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAMPSON, 99 F. Supp. 3d 1352 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Zambito that Sampson and his occupants were not wearing seatbelts in violation of Florida Statute § 316.614 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CRAWFORD, a. k. a., 568 F. App'x 725 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 316.614(4)(b), (5). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASE- REPORT NO., 130 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of F.S. 316.614, be read or paraphrased . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 115 So. 3d 208 (Fla. 2013)

. . . failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances. [401.9] F.S. 316.614 . . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of F.S. 316.614, be read or paraphrased . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO. AND STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 52 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 2010)

. . . failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances. [401.9] F.S. 316.614 . . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of F.S. 316.614, be read or paraphrased . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances. [401.9] F.S. 316.614 . . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of F.S. 316.614, be read or paraphrased . . .

RIPPY, v. SHEPARD,, 15 So. 3d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Stat. (2008) (allowing 14 and 15 year olds to drive farm tractors for work); 316.614, Fla. . . .

M. QUARANTELLO, v. T. LEROY,, 977 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . caretaker based on evidence that the child was not properly restrained by a seat belt under section 316.614 . . . Both sections 316.613 and 316.614 were enacted in large part to protect children from injuries in automobile . . .

CYBROSKI, a v. WRIGHT,, 927 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . of the parents, the trial court concluded that the Florida Safety Belt Law, Florida Statutes section 316.614 . . . Pursuant to section 316.614(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), it is illegal to “operate a motor vehicle . . . but such violation may be considered as evidence of comparative negligence, in any civil action. § 316.614 . . . Thus, contrary to the parents’ assertions, section 316.614 did not displace the common law right to bring . . . time of the accident, we assume the trial court’s reference to section 316.613, instead of section 316.614 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WEAVER,, 145 F. App'x 639 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 316.614(8). . Defendant also relies on United States v. . . .

DO CO MIAMI CATERING, INC. v. CHAPMAN,, 899 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Safety Kleen Corp., 693 So.2d 934 (Fla.1996), it was considering the impact of section 316.614(10), Florida . . .

ADJIMAN, v. ADJIMAN,, 863 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Dellapenta, 838 P.2d 1153 (Wyo.1992) and by statute, see § 316.614, Fla. . . .

M. CONNELLY, DBN v. HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY,, 351 F.3d 535 (1st Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 316.614(9), and yet other states leave the issue to the courts, e.g., N.J. Stat. . . .

MORROW, v. STATE, 848 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 316.614(5), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that “[i]t is unlawful for any person 16 years . . .

HATCHER, v. STATE, 834 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The vehicle in which Hatcher was riding was stopped for violations of sections 316.151(1) and 316.614 . . . Because it is unlawful, according to section 316.614(5), Florida Statutes (2000), for any person eighteen . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL CASES, 778 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 2000)

. . . The committee takes no ■position on the effect on SJI 6.14 of §--316.614(10), Fkv Stat. (1987) (violation . . .

MALONEY, v. WILLIAMS,, 732 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . take advantage of his own voluntary inebriation to avoid the standard of care established by section 316.614 . . .

BRITO, v. COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, a a a, 753 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Notwithstanding, section 316.614 Florida Statutes (1993), the undisputed facts in this case demonstrate . . . such discovery was concluded, our reversal on the duty to warn issue moots this argument. .Section 316.614 . . . Fla.Stat. § 316.614(10) (1993). . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL CASES NO., 711 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998)

. . . to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under like circumstances. [4.11] Section 316.614 . . . Different factual situations may require that different portions of section 316.614, Florida Statutes . . .

RIDLEY, v. SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION,, 693 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1996)

. . . certified to be of great public importance: IF EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED CONCERNING A VIOLATION OF SECTION 316.614 . . . Section 316.614, Florida Statutes (1995), provides in part: (4) It is unlawful for any person: (a) To . . . Evolution of the Seat Belt Defense We also hold, consistent with the language of section 316.614(10), . . . (codified at § 316.614(1)~(10), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1986)). . . . See § 316.614(4), (5), Fla.Stat. (1995). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PENLAND,, 668 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . I concur that the version of section 316.614(10) prior to the 1990 amendment is controlling in this case . . . granted summary judgment on the seat belt defense, as Pen-land relied on an amended version of section 316.614 . . .

OSGOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. J. v. SCHLAU, 654 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 316.614(10), Florida Statutes (1987), the relevant statute to this case, provided that a violation . . . [could] be considered as evidence of comparative negligence” in a civil action. § 316.614(10), Fla.Stat . . .

SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, a v. RIDLEY, 666 So. 2d 913 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 316.614(4)(b), Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle . . . The instruction does not mention section 316.614, Florida Statutes (Supp.l986). . . . The plaintiff also argued that section 316.614(10) barred the giving of the requested instruction. . . . That subsection states: § 316.614(10) A violation of the provisions of this section shall not constitute . . . We find that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that a violation of section 316.614 . . . I am therefore of the opinion, for the reasons stated more fully infra, that section 316.614(10), Florida . . . Section 316.614(10) does not apply, however, to the plaintiffs damages resulting from his collision with . . . In 1990, section 316.614(10) was amended by adding the following underlined language: A violation of . . . Yet, if section 316.614(10) is read in that manner, then the legislative restriction provided in the . . . In my judgment, the legislative purpose behind the 1990 amendment to section 316.614 of avoiding a double . . .

PAGES, v. DOMINGUEZ, a By DOMINGUEZ, E., 652 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 316.614(10), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

UNION, v. STATE, 642 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Appellant cites section 316.614(5), Florida Statutes, which makes it unlawful for anyone over age 16 . . .

BULLDOG LEASING COMPANY, INC. v. A. CURTIS,, 630 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 316.614, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986). . . .

A. CURTIS, v. BULLDOG LEASING COMPANY, INC., 602 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 316.614, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. UMANA, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 37 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . violation of Florida Statute 316.193 and 316.1925 driving on the sidewalk and violating Florida Statute 316.614 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 876 F.2d 1521 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 316.614 (West Supp.1989) provides in relevant part: (4) It is unlawful for any person: (b) To operate . . .

BONDS, Jr. Sr. v. S. FLEMING,, 539 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . seat belt is consistent with the public policy expressed within Florida’s Safety Belt Law, section 316.614 . . . See § 316.614(5), (10). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL CASES, 540 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1989)

. . . The committee takes no position on the effect on SJI 6.14 of § 316.614(10), Fla.Stat. (1987) (violation . . .

PARKER v. MONTGOMERY, Sr., 529 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See § 316.614, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986), and American Auto. Ass’n v. . . . Section 316.613(3) also remains intact following the adoption of section 316.614. . . . .

TUCKER, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY,, 22 Fla. Supp. 2d 56 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1987)

. . . Florida Statute 316.614(10) provides that a violation of this law does not constitute negligence per . . .

AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, INC. Co. Co. D. v. TEHRANI, 508 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . issues include Tehrani's argument that our 1986 Legislature’s passage of the Florida Safety Belt Law, § 316.614 . . .