Cases from cite.case.law:

GALGANO A- a v. BUCHANAN,, 783 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . He claims that section 318.19, which precludes the use of section 318.14(4), should apply instead of . . . Section 318.19, Florida Statutes (1995) provides that: Any person cited for the infractions listed in . . . There is no evidence that Galgano’s traffic infraction fell within the ambit of section 318.19. . . . For more serious accidents, section 318.19 provides that persons cited for infractions shall not have . . . Although under the provisions of Section 318.19(1) Mrs. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF TRAFFIC COURT, 685 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 1996)

. . . (o) “Infraction requiring a mandatory hearing” refers to an infraction listed in section 318.19, Florida . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 608 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1992)

. . . (p) “Infraction Rrequiring a Mmandato-ry Shearing” refers to an infraction listed in section 318.19, . . .

ABADI, v. UNITED STATES, 782 F. Supp. 59 (E.D. Mich. 1992)

. . . As a result, on October 28, 1983, plaintiff made payments to the IRS in the amount of $173,-318.19. . . .

FIGUEREDO v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., 583 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . had pled guilty by mail as to a traffic charge in which a personal appearance was required by section 318.19 . . .

IN RE CITATION OF JOHN H. DALE, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 189 (Leon Cty. Ct. 1990)

. . . See e.g., Sections 318.18, 318.19, Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 458 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1984)

. . . 6.330 Election to Attend Traffic School (a) Unless a mandatory hearing is required pursuant to section 318.19 . . .

CARTER, v. RUKAB, 437 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See Section 318.19(1), Florida Statutes (1979). . . . falling under the protection of Section 318.14(4) or under the self-inculpa-tory effect of Section 318.19 . . . Analyzing the problem in this manner, we observe that Section 318.19(1) contemplates a mandatory court . . . Although under the provisions of Section 318.19(1) Mrs. . . . In terms of appellees’ right to introduce evidence of a plea of guilty under Section 318.19(1), we simply . . . However, Section 318.19 provides that a person cited for certain specified infractions, including any . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR TRAFFIC COURTS, 410 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1982)

. . . 6.330 Election to Attend Traffic School (a) Unless a mandatory hearing is required pursuant to section 318.19 . . .

v. SINGER,, 389 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 318.19(1) states that the privilege of mailing in a fine in lieu of an actual appearance as set . . .

In TRAFFIC COURT RULES, 366 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1978)

. . . “Infraction Requiring a Mandatory Hearing” refers to an infraction listed in Section 318.19, Florida . . .

MACKEY, a v. RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY, 349 So. 2d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Because the traffic incident caused personal injury to Debra, Wheeler was required by Section 318.19, . . . Section 318.19, prescribing procedures for the disposition of traffic citations requiring a mandatory . . . and (4) should reasonably be applied also in the case of more serious offenses handled under Section 318.19 . . .

In TRANSITION RULE TRAFFIC COURT RULE, 342 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1977)

. . . ELECTION TO ATTEND TRAFFIC SCHOOL (a) Unless a mandatory hearing is required pursuant to section 318.19 . . .

In TRANSITION RULE TRAFFIC COURT RULES, 311 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Attend Traffic School is amended to read: Unless a mandatory hearing is required pursuant to section 318.19 . . .

In TRANSITION RULE, 306 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1974)

. . . “Infraction Requiring a Mandatory Hearing” means those infractions listed in section 318.19, of Florida . . . Note The department is unable to supply the information necessary to enforce the provisions of section 318.19 . . . Unless a mandatory hearing is required pursuant to section 318.19 of Florida Statutes, or the alleged . . .

PARIS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., 68 F. Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y. 1946)

. . . Metropolitan and the escrowees (Exhibit D amended complaint) was entered into and Metropolitan deposited $792,-318.19 . . .

v., 6 B.T.A. 335 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . determination by the Commissioner of a deficiency of $14,155.79 income tax for 1920 and an over-assessment of $318.19 . . .