Cases from cite.case.law:

A. BURGESS, a v. UNITED STATES,, 109 Fed. Cl. 223 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . abandon a segment on the eastern portion of the Railroad Line, specifically, that between milepost 318.36 . . .

In CORNMESSER S, INC. B. v., 264 B.R. 159 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . realized from the sale of debtor’s assets ($69,596.67) and from the sale of Cornmesser’s residence ($354,-318.36 . . .

In MYCRO- TEK, INC. D. ALLISON, v. GATE ELECTRONICS, INC. f d b a, 191 B.R. 188 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1996)

. . . Bank filed its Special Appearance and Answer of Garnishee, indicating that as of May 5, 1995, it held $318.36 . . . In its Answer and Amended Answer, the Bank claims that the account balance was $318.36 on May 5, but . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 365.18 2006 1,842.00 354.74 2007 1,980.52 344.89 2008 2,129.45 335.57 2009 2,289.59 326.74 2010 2,461.77 318.36 . . .

FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, v. UNITED STATES, 8 Cl. Ct. 490 (Ct. Cl. 1985)

. . . The plaintiff then added to this figure the extended overhead of $318.36 per day for 14 days, 10 percent . . . The plaintiff then added to this figure extended overhead of $318.36 for one day, 10 percent profit, . . . To that figure, it added 25 days of extended overhead at $318.36 per day, a 10 percent profit, and a . . . To that figure; the Court has added 19 days of extended overhead at $318.36 per day, 10 percent profit . . . Accordingly, Fortec now seeks $318.36 per day extended overhead for each day of delay, including $57.88 . . .

MARKS Co- v. PHILADELPHIA WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, a, 125 F. Supp. 369 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

. . . .-06 with interest for a total recovery of $318.36. . . .

STANDARD ACC. INS. CO. v. HUDDLESTON, 51 F. Supp. 645 (M.D. Tenn. 1943)

. . . On sub-project #6 (Buffalo Valley School) the amount claimed was $318.36. . . .