The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 29-4006(l)(k) and (s), 29-4006(2), and 28-322.05 (West, Operative Jan. 1, 2010). . . . Stat. § 28-322.05 would not prohibit texting. (Tr. 255:15-23.) . . . Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05(1). . . . Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05(2). . . . . Stat. § 28-322.05(l)(a)-(k). . . .
. . . . §§ 29-4006(l)(k) & (s), 29^4006(2), and 28-322.05, either alone or collectively impose a punishment . . . probation, parole or court-monitored supervision on or after January 1, 2010. • How Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05 . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 322.05 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .
. . . . §§ 28-322.05 and 294001.01. See Nebraska Laws, LB 97, §§ 14, 24. . . . Section 28-322.05 is a new criminal statute (unlawful use of the Internet by a prohibited sex offender . . . Rev.Stat. § 29-4006(2) (West, Operative Jan. 1, 2010), and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05 (West, Operative . . . Ninth and Tenth Causes of Action — Due Process — Regarding Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05 (West, Operative . . . Example 2: Considering Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-322.05, one wonders what the word “allows” means. . . .
. . . Moreover, his transportation of 322.05 kilograms of marijuana and 89.58 kilograms of cocaine provided . . .
. . . . § 322.05. . See Fla. . . .
. . . . § 322.05(8), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 322.05(5), Fla.Stat. (1989) (restriction on drivers' licenses); § 97.041(3)(a), Fla.Stat . . .
. . . They may not register for a drivers’ license, section 322.05(5), Florida Statutes (1989), and a court . . .
. . . Pursuant to Sections 322.05(3) and 322.44, Florida Statutes (1977), the appellant correctly denied issuance . . .
. . . Section 322.05(5), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .
. . . failed to support the allegations of the complaint with reference to alleged violations of Sections 322.05 . . .
. . . conclusion is that the provisions of this Section must be read in pari materia with Sections 322.03 and 322.05 . . .
. . . Premiums aggregating $207,-322.05 were paid to Gostrach out of the plaintiff’s funds from its account . . .