Cases from cite.case.law:

FIGUEREDO, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 229 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (2015), provides a basis for the revocation of a driver's license . . . of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke Figueredo's driver's license as provided in section 322.055 . . .

BURGESS, v. STATE, 198 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . driving while the person’s driver’s license or driving privilege is • suspended or revoked”); see also §§ 322.055 . . .

BRUNSON, v. STATE, 31 So. 3d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . State, 655 So.2d 1308, 1308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding, per section 322.055, Florida Statutes, a trial . . .

BRADSHEER K. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 20 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . State, 617 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1993), the court considered the constitutionality of section 322.055(1), Florida . . . the department to revoke the driver's license” of a person convicted of a specified drug offense. § 322.055 . . . Accordingly, subsection 322.055(1) is constitutionally valid even without the requirement that a motor . . .

STATE v. CLAYTON,, 994 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . This is not a valid ground for a second withhold of adjudication for a drug offense because section 322.055 . . . Section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides for a suspension of the driver’s license and driving . . . Section 322.055(1) provides: Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.28, upon the conviction of a person . . .

BOLWARE, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2008)

. . . possession of cocaine and marijuana, and the trial court revoked his driver’s license pursuant to section 322.055 . . . other cases, in which the court revoked the driver’s licenses of certain drug offenders, see, e.g., § 322.055 . . . See § 322.055(1), Fla. Stat. . . . . . § 322.055 expressly requires the Court to direct the department to revoke driving privileges of any . . .

PUGH, v. STATE, 971 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . We reverse that portion of the sentence ordering a driver’s license revocation under section 322.055( . . .

LESCHER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 946 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . not been informed that as a result of his plea his driver’s license would be revoked under section 322.055 . . . In this case, the two year license revocation mandated by section 322.055(1) was definite, immediate, . . .

STATE v. R. A. a, 928 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . contained in section 322.056, Florida Statutes, which provides: Notwithstanding the provisions of section 322.055 . . .

AYOUB, v. STATE, 901 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 322.055, Fla. Stat. (2002); Martin v. State, 618 So.2d 737, 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). . . .

BEARD, v. STATE, 874 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . permanently revoked pursuant to section 322.28(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2002), rather than section 322.055 . . .

HUESCA, v. STATE, 841 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . directed the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke his license pursuant to section 322.055 . . . Section 322.055(1) provides, in part, that: [Ujpon the conviction of a person 18 years of age or older . . .

FRASILUS, v. STATE, 840 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Frasilus argues the special condition was improper as applied to him because section 322.055(1), Florida . . . We do not reach the merits of the issue as to whether section 322.055, Florida Statutes requires an adjudication . . .

PRIANTI, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . We have held that a mandatory two year revocation of a driver’s license under section 322.055(1) is a . . .

PARTLOW, v. STATE, 813 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . 4th DCA 1998), where we held that the mandatory 2 year revocation of a driver’s license under section 322.055 . . .

VICHICH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 799 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Stat. (1999) (arresting law enforcement officer); §§ 322.055, .056, .28, Fla. Stat. (1999) (court). . . .

WHIPPLE, v. STATE, 789 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . defendant informed that as a result of his plea, his driver’s license would be revoked pursuant to section 322.055 . . . court was required to determine that appellant understood that he was subject to a suspension under 322.055 . . .

STATE v. M. L. R. a, 722 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . of certain alcohol, drug, or tobacco offenses; prohibition. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.055 . . .

DANIELS, v. STATE, 716 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Daniels informed that as a result of his plea, his driver’s license would be revoked pursuant to section 322.055 . . . The court ordered revocation pursuant" to section 322.055 and directed Daniels to surrender his license . . . In this case, the two year' license revocation mandated by section 322.055(1) was definite, immediate . . . trial court was required to determine that the defendant understood that he was subject to the section 322.055 . . . Section 322.055(1) provides in pertinent part: [Ujpon the conviction of a person 18 years of age or older . . .

S. EASLEY, v. STATE, 709 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . trial court’s authority with respect to suspension of his driver’s license is provided for in section 322.055 . . .

STATE v. M. D. a, 706 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Although section 322.055, Florida Statutes (1995), imposes similar suspension requirements on adults . . . just days after his eighteenth birthday, the trial court has created a small window between sections 322.055 . . . The language of section 322.055 leaves no discretion in the presiding judge. . . .

CRISEL, Sr. v. STATE, 677 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . the same day the court ordered the revocation of the appellant’s driver’s license pursuant to section 322.055 . . . We conclude that it is unnecessary to decide whether the section 322.055(1) revocation constituted a . . .

NANCE, v. STATE, 674 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The proper procedure pursuant to section 322.055, Florida Statutes (1993), is for the trial court to . . .

LEE, v. STATE, 673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . This crime is not within the ambit of section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (1993) regarding the suspension . . . by the court and reportT ing is not required to the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to section 322.055 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LITSCH,, 664 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Motor Vehicles to issue a driver’s license for work/business purposes to Appellee pursuant to section 322.055 . . . Under the authority of section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes, the state revoked his driving privileges . . . permitted to obtain a driver’s license for business or employment purposes as authorized by section 322.055 . . . business or employment purposes,” and not to superimpose the entirety of section 322.271 on to section 322.055 . . . Section 322.055(1) requires an individual to go through a rehabilitation program before having his license . . .

GILBERT, v. STATE, 659 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . order revoking Gilbert’s driver’s license and remand for further proceedings in accordance with section 322.055 . . .

CRAWFORD, v. STATE, 651 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides a basis for the revocation of a driver’s license . . . However, section 322.055 does not provide the trial court with the authority to suspend or revoke the . . . trial court to order the department to revoke appellant’s license for two years pursuant to section 322.055 . . .

LITE, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1993)

. . . .2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the district court upheld the constitutionality of subsection 322.055 . . . Subsection 322.055(1) provides in pertinent part that upon the conviction of a person 18 years of age . . . At Lite’s sentencing hearing, the trial court found subsection 322.055(1) unconstitutional and refused . . . Accordingly, subsection 322.055(1) is constitutionally valid even without the requirement that a motor . . . We also disagree with Lite’s contention that subsection 322.055(1) violates equal protection principles . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . suspension of his driver’s license was improper, because it was not done in accordance with section 322.055 . . . Nevertheless, section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes, authorizes the sentencing court to direct the Department . . . WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur. . § 322.055(1), Fla.Stat. (1991), provides: (1) Notwithstanding the . . .

STATE v. R. N. a, 597 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.055, . . .

STATE v. LITE,, 592 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Pursuant to section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), appellee’s license was required to be suspended . . . During appellee’s sentencing, the trial court refused to enforce section 322.055(1), finding it unconstitutional . . . In so doing, we reaffirm our decision that section 322.055(1) is constitutional, and therefore reverse . . . Section 322.055(1), provides in pertinent part: upon the conviction of a person 18 years of age or older . . . Pursuant to section 322.055(1), only those convicted of possession, sale or trafficking of controlled . . .

STATE v. LAWTON, a k a, 588 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . reverse that portion of the trial court’s sentencing order refusing to apply the provisions of section 322.055 . . . plea agreement and sentence stand, the sentence should be in accord with the provisions of section 322.055 . . .

VINYARD, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . cocaine in violation of section 893.13(1)(a), and in suspending his driver’s license pursuant to section 322.055 . . . trial court of its jurisdiction to direct that his driving privileges be revoked, pursuant to section 322.055 . . . In revoking the defendant’s driver’s license, the court did not follow the mandate of section 322.055 . . . Section 322.055, Florida Statutes (1987), reads: (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 322.-28, the . . .

NICHOLS, v. STATE, 559 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Although section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (1987), gives the trial court the authority to direct the . . .

R. NEIL, v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . State, 554 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (1987), authorized the . . .

BLAIR, v. STATE, 554 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . probation: “Your drivers [sic] license will be revoked for a period of thirty-six (36) months.... ” Section 322.055 . . .

T. CALLAHAN, v. STATE, 550 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 322.055(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .