Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 231 So. 3d 384 (Fla. 2017)

. . . See § 322.251(1), (2), and§ 322.34,(2), (3),(4), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 322.34(2) and § 322.251(1), (2), Fla. Stat. . . . privately owned parking lot, that is open to public use by vehicles, is considered to be a highway.] § 322.251 . . . NO, No Valid Driver’s • License 322.03 28.9 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Comments Pursuant to § 322.251(1), . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See § 322.251(1), (2), and § 322M(2), (3), (k), Fla. . . . See § 322M(2) md § 322.251(1), (2), Fla. Stat. . . . or place if any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular traffic. § 322.251 . . . operate the vehicle, regardless of whether [he][she] is actually operating the vehicle at the time. § 322.251 . . .

STATE v. WOODEN,, 92 So. 3d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . such person effective 20 days after the date the order of suspension is mailed in accordance with s. 322.251 . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 87 So. 3d 774 (Fla. 2012)

. . . In reaching its decision, the Fifth District construed sections 322.34 and 322.251(1) together. . . . It explained that section 322.251(1) outlines the manner in which a notice of suspension is provided, . . . It also stated that section 322.251(1) permits notice either in person or by mail. See id. . . . Section 322.251(1), which concerns the same subject matter as section 322.34 — i.e., driving while a . . . See § 322.251(1). The first mechanism is to provide the notice “by personal delivery.” Id. . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 48 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Appellant makes no mention of section 322.251(2) in her brief. . . . The manner of providing notice for this type of suspension order is contained in section 322.251. . . . Section 322.251(1) directs that service be by either personal delivery or mail. . . . Section 322.251(2) sets forth the effect of mail service, providing that record entry that notice was . . . Thus, to conclude otherwise would render the entirety of section 322.251(2) meaningless. . . .

K. SWEETING, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . appellant could be convicted for driving with a suspended license, we would refer the parties to section 322.251 . . . licenses, or the date an affidavit swearing such licenses are lost has been filed with the department.” § 322.251 . . .

TURNER a k a v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . admitted into evidence, shows that notice of the suspension was sent to Turner pursuant to section 322.251 . . .

V. HAYGOOD, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The driving record also provided that the statutory notice required by section 322.251, Florida Statutes . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES No., 958 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 322.251(1), (2), and § S22M&), (3), (If), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 322.3⅛(2) and § 322.251(1), (2), Fla. Stat. . . . when if any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel traffic. § 322.251 . . . operate the vehicle, regardless of whether [he] [she] is actually operating the vehicle at the time. § 322.251 . . .

WEATHERS, v. STATE, 937 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Entry Description 7/10/97 Rev-5 Years Habitual Traffic Offender 6/20/97 6/20/97 Notice required by s. 322.251 . . .

CARD, v. STATE, 927 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . terminal device of a court or clerk of court, entry in a, driver’s record that the notice required by s. 322.251 . . .

SORRELL, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Notice of the revocation was established pursuant to section 322.251(2), Florida Statutes (2001). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)

. . . are related in that section 832.09 provides for suspension of drivers’ licenses pursuant to section 322.251 . . . Section 3 creates section 322.251, Florida Statutes to provide for notice to a licensee whose driving . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 830 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Further, in both instances the department is obliged by section 322.251 to give notice of the revocation . . . of the giving of the notice in the .DMV’s records is sufficient proof that the notice was given. § 322.251 . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . appear is issued by the court shall have his or her driver’s license suspended or revoked pursuant to s. 322.251 . . . Section 3 of Chapter 98-223, which became section 322.251, provides details as to notice and other matters . . . Chapter 322, our driver’s license statute, provides in section 322.251(7)(a)(l) that a driver’s license . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 3 creates section 322.251, Florida Statues to provide for notice to a licensee whose driving . . .

RODGERS, v. STATE, 804 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . As to the second element, the one requiring notice of the revocation, section 322.251(2) provides: “Proof . . . State, 763 So.2d 285 (Fla.2000). . § 322.251(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . See § 322.251(6), Fla. . . . (d) Driving a motor vehicle while his or her license is suspended or revoked....”). .See § 322.251(3) . . .

VICHICH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 799 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Although it revoked the license and did not suspend it, the DHSMV presumably based its actions on sections 322.251 . . . Section 322.251 requires the DHSMV to provide the licensee notice of any cancellation, suspension, revocation . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DAVIS, Jr., 775 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 322.251 prescribes the notice requirements for such orders. . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 764 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . that there was evidence that the notice of suspension was mailed to him, as is required by section 322.251 . . . State establish that it had provided the defendant notice of the revocation as required by section 322.251 . . . knowledge of the suspension, leaving the State to prove only that the notice requirement of section 322.251 . . .

FIELDS, v. STATE, 731 So. 2d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . § 322.251(1X2), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Under section 322.251(1), the legislature appears to have determined that proper mailing is conclusive . . .

RIDGEWAY, v. STATE, 712 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . of Appellant’s community control because his certified driving record, in combination with sections 322.251 . . .

MITCHELL, v. STATE, 704 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See §§ 322.251, 322.2651, Fla. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CONNOLLY, 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 130 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . S. 322.251. . . .

McCRACKEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 80 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . court or clerk of court terminal device, entry in a driver’s record that the notice required by S. 322.251 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CONNOLLY, 13 Fla. Supp. 2d 61 (Broward Cty. Ct. 1985)

. . . record with the notation thereon that notice of the suspension was given by certified mail, see Sections 322.251 . . .

STATE v. FALCON, 48 Fla. Supp. 195 (Dade Cty. Ct. 1979)

. . . to the defendant in this case was defective in that it did not include the affidavit required by F.S.322.251 . . . licenses are being cancelled, suspended or revoked is now required by the 1978 amended Florida Statute 322.251 . . . Compare 322.251 (1977) which only required notice if otherwise required in Chapter 322. . . . F.S. 322.251 (1978). . . .

KNAP v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, 46 Fla. Supp. 116 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1977)

. . . The department mailed the order of July 2, 1975, by certified mail pursuant to Florida Statute 322.251 . . . Stat. §322.27(2) (c) (1975) and §322.251 (1975), the effect of a suspension is not affected by the failure . . .