Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. MILLER,, 193 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . driver’s license or driving privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . license] [driving privilege] was [suspended] [revoked] [canceled] pursuant to Florida Statute [316.655] [322.26 . . .

SILHA, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES OF STATE OF FLORIDA, L. T. N., 109 So. 3d 820 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 322.26(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1999), which the trial court also cited in its order, provides . . . of the following offenses: ... a fourth violation of s. 316.193 [DUI]-” A revocation under section 322.26 . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 79 So. 3d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . For example, an unlicensed driver would lose her driving privilege under section 322.26, Florida Statutes . . . driver’s license or driving privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CRANE,, 10 So. 3d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . -1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (“[T]he revocation of a driver’s license, which is mandatory under section 322.26 . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 890 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The judgment erroneously cites to section “322.26 or 28,” when the correct statutory citation for the . . .

LIPOVSKY, v. STATE, 854 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . driver’s license or driving privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

G. WEBER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 845 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Pursuant to section 322.26(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1998 Supp.), the Department of Highway Safety and . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Section 8 amends section 322.26, Florida Statutes which deals with mandatory revocation of driver’s licenses . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 830 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . which makes it unlawful to drive after one’s license has been permanently revoked pursuant to sections 322.26 . . . a]ny person whose driver’s license or driving privilege has been permanently revoked pursuant to s. 322.26 . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . person whose driver’s license or driving privilege has been permanently revoked pursuant to section 322.26 . . .

WEBB, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Any person whose driver’s license or driving privilege has been permanently revoked pursuant to s. 322.26 . . . Section 322.26(l)(a) provides for the permanent revocation of a driver’s license in cases involving [ . . . Thus, a DUI manslaughter conviction sufficient to permanently revoke a license under section 322.26(l . . . See § 322.26(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . Section 322.26(2), Florida Statutes (2000), also provides for a permanent revocation of a driver's license . . .

BLAKE, v. STATE, 814 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . holding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to suspend defendant’s driver’s license); §§ 316.027(2) and 322.26 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 8 amends section 322.26, Florida Statutes which deals with mandatory revocation of driver’s licenses . . .

VICHICH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 799 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Vic-hich’s driver’s license based upon the legislative mandate in sections 322.26(l)(a) and 322.28(2) . . . Sections 322.26(l)(a) and 322.28(2), (3) require the DHSMV to permanently revoke a driver’s license when . . .

SIMMONS, v. STATE, 767 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 322.26, Florida Statutes authorizes a license revocation by the Department of Highway Safety . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . driver’s license or driving privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

LARCHER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 736 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . conviction, sent defendant an order of license revocation, suspension or cancellation pursuant to section 322.26 . . . Degrossi noted that section 322.26(2) imposes a duty upon the Department to suspend the driver’s license . . . petitioners’ licenses were suspended automatically by operation of law by the Department, pursuant to section 322.26 . . . license therein was not suspended automatically as the result of a DUI conviction pursuant to section 322.26 . . .

WAITES, v. STATE, 702 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . driver’s license or driving privilege is canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . . canceled, or revoked pursuant to sections 316.655 (suspension due to conviction of traffic offenses), 322.26 . . .

LEWEK, v. STATE, 702 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Smith, 638 So.2d 509 (Fla.1994); see also §§ 316.655, 322.26(8), 322.27(2), 322.28(2), 322.28(5), Fla . . .

STATE v. D. HARVEY,, 693 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . privilege has been canceled, suspended, or revoked as provided by law, except persons defined in s. 322.26⅛ . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DEGROSSI,, 680 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Department”) sent Degrossi an order of license revocation, suspension or cancellation, pursuant to Section 322.26 . . . In response to this threat, the legislature enacted Section 322.26(2) which imposes a duty upon the Department . . . highways which is a violation of this chapter-” De-grossi contends “conviction” as used in Sections 322.26 . . . Because Sections 322.26(2) and 322.28(6) must be construed in accordance with the legislative intent . . .

CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. REED, CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. YORK,, 680 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . following a DUI conviction: Upon the suspension or revocation of a license pursuant to the provisions of s. 322.26 . . .

STATE v. N. SMITH,, 638 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Any person whose driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . . canceled, or revoked pursuant to sections 316.655 (suspension due to conviction of traffic offenses), 322.26 . . .

BOUTWELL, v. STATE, 631 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1994)

. . . Any person whose driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

STATE v. N. SMITH,, 624 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Any person whose driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

COOPER, v. STATE, 621 So. 2d 729 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Any person whose driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked pursuant to s. 316.655, s. 322.26 . . .

LITE, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1993)

. . . failure of automobile owner to have liability insurance even if owner is not involved in accident); § 322.26 . . .

SCHOTTEL, v. STATE, 590 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . The state argues that section 322.26(3), Florida Statutes (1989) authorizes the trial court to request . . . Pursuant to section 322.26(3), Florida Statutes (1989), the trial court may forward a driver’s record . . . .2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (burglary of automobile conviction does not support application of section 322.26 . . . See §§ 322.26(8), 322.274, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . operator’s record of conviction of ”[a]ny felony in the commission of which a motor vehicle is used.” § 322.26 . . .

H. MORRIS, Jr. v. STATE, 590 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . We remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in compliance with section 322.26, Florida . . .

HOPE, v. STATE, 588 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . REVOCATION OF DRIVER’S LICENSE Section 322.26(3), Florida Statutes, provides that the Department of Highway . . . thus authorizing the court to revoke under 322.28(2)(a) and (e) and the Department to revoke under 322.26 . . .

VINYARD, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 322.26(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

S. STUART, v. STATE, 579 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 322.26(3), Fla.Stat. (1987); Hughes v. State, 578 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Mandile v. . . . We remand to the trial court for further proceedings in compliance with section 322.26(3). . . .

HUGHES, v. STATE, 578 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 322.26(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . We remand these cases to the trial court for further proceedings in compliance with section 322.26, Florida . . .

VACHRIS, v. STATE, 573 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles which must revoke the driving privileges pursuant to Florida Statutes 322.26 . . .

TRANSTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, SPACE ORDNANCE SYSTEMS DIVISION, v. UNITED STATES,, 22 Cl. Ct. 349 (Cl. Ct. 1990)

. . . S & S for x-ray labor amounts to $14.08 and for transportation $322.26. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. GODDU, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 222 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1990)

. . . regarded as punishment but is na administrative remedy for the public protection that mandatorily (See § 322.26 . . . Such suspensions are mandatory by virtue of § 322.26 Fla. Stat. . . .

DOUGLAS, v. STATE, 559 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See §§ 322.26(3), 322.26(8), 322.274, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

HUBBARD, v. STATE, 559 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . That statute provides: 322.26 Mandatory revocation of license by department. — The department shall forthwith . . .

FERRIS, v. STATE, 558 So. 2d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . However, both sections 316.027(3) and 322.26(4), Florida Statutes (1987) require that the Department . . .

SPERA, v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See § 322.26(3), Fla.Stat. (1987) and Mandile v. State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). . . . commission of a felony in which a motor vehicle was used is covered by section 377.-27(l)(a) and section 322.26 . . .

WATSON, v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . , however, that the felonies involved the use of a motor vehicle in which case, pursuant to section 322.26 . . . We, thus, find section 322.26(3), Florida Statutes (1987) not applicable to this case. . . .

VACHRIS, v. STATE, 553 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles which must revoke the driving privilege pursuant to Florida Statute 322.26 . . . portion of Vachris’ sentence suspending his driver’s license, and remand for compliance with section 322.26 . . .

MANDILE, v. STATE, 547 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 322.26(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). . . . We remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings in compliance with section 322.26. . . . The statute provides the following: 322.26 Mandatory revocation of license by department. — The department . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. TURNER, 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 110 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . The determinative issues in an implied consent hearing are listed in § 322.26 l(3)(a-d). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BELL,, 505 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . §§ 322.25(1), 322.2505, 322.26, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . See, e.g., § 322.26(3) and (4), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. HARTMAN, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 97 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1986)

. . . case is the recognition that the revocation of a driver’s license, which is mandatory under Section 322.26 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, v. VOGT,, 489 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . case is the recognition that the revocation of a driver’s license, which is mandatory under section 322.26 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. FARR, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 85 (Orange Cty. Ct. 1985)

. . . Is the issue defined by Florida Statute 322.26 l(3)(c) a question of “willful refusal” or a question . . .

STATE v. A. NAUGHTON,, 395 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . There is nothing in the statute, section 322.26, Florida Statutes (1977), which requires that a person . . .

CROSSWHITE v. UNITED STATES, 438 F. Supp. 368 (D. Or. 1977)

. . . They then brought this action to recover $2,069.00 in deficiency tax, $322.26 in assessed interest, and . . .

W. INGRAM, v. PETTIT, Jr., 340 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1976)

. . . Section 322.26, Fla.Stat. (1973). . . .

SMITH, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE,, 93 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1957)

. . . Section 322.26, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

HERMAN BARTELS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 156 Fla. 535 (Fla. 1945)

. . . by the language of the second paragraph of Section 322.25 when construed in connection with Section 322.26 . . .