Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 322.2615 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 322.2615 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 322.2615

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 322
DRIVER LICENSES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 322.2615
322.2615 Suspension of license; right to review.
(1)(a) A law enforcement officer or correctional officer shall, on behalf of the department, suspend the driving privilege of a person who is driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle and who has an unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher, or of a person who has refused to submit to a urine test or a test of his or her breath-alcohol or blood-alcohol level. The officer shall take the person’s driver license and issue the person a 10-day temporary permit if the person is otherwise eligible for the driving privilege and shall issue the person a notice of suspension. If a blood test has been administered, the officer or the agency employing the officer shall transmit such results to the department within 5 days after receipt of the results. If the department then determines that the person had a blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher, the department shall suspend the person’s driver license pursuant to subsection (3).
(b) The suspension under paragraph (a) shall be pursuant to, and the notice of suspension shall inform the driver of, the following:
1.a. The driver refused to submit to a lawful breath, blood, or urine test and his or her driving privilege is suspended for a period of 1 year for a first refusal or for a period of 18 months if his or her driving privilege has been previously suspended as a result of a refusal to submit to such a test; or
b. The driver was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle and had an unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher and his or her driving privilege is suspended for a period of 6 months for a first offense or for a period of 1 year if his or her driving privilege has been previously suspended under this section.
2. The suspension period shall commence on the date of issuance of the notice of suspension.
3. The driver may request a formal or informal review of the suspension by the department within 10 days after the date of issuance of the notice of suspension or may request a review of eligibility for a restricted driving privilege under s. 322.271(7).
4. The temporary permit issued at the time of suspension expires at midnight of the 10th day following the date of issuance of the notice of suspension.
5. The driver may submit to the department any materials relevant to the suspension.
(2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (1)(a), the law enforcement officer shall forward to the department, within 5 days after issuing the notice of suspension, the driver license; an affidavit stating the officer’s grounds for belief that the person was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or chemical or controlled substances; the results of any breath or blood test or an affidavit stating that a breath, blood, or urine test was requested by a law enforcement officer or correctional officer and that the person refused to submit; the officer’s description of the person’s field sobriety test, if any; and the notice of suspension. The failure of the officer to submit materials within the 5-day period specified in this subsection and in subsection (1) does not affect the department’s ability to consider any evidence submitted at or prior to the hearing.
(b) The officer may also submit a copy of the crash report and a copy of a video recording of the field sobriety test or the attempt to administer such test. Materials submitted to the department by a law enforcement agency or correctional agency shall be considered self-authenticating and shall be in the record for consideration by the hearing officer. Notwithstanding s. 316.066(4), the crash report shall be considered by the hearing officer.
(3) If the department determines that the license should be suspended pursuant to this section and if the notice of suspension has not already been served upon the person by a law enforcement officer or correctional officer as provided in subsection (1), the department shall issue a notice of suspension and, unless the notice is mailed pursuant to s. 322.251, a temporary permit that expires 10 days after the date of issuance if the driver is otherwise eligible.
(4) If the person whose license was suspended requests an informal review pursuant to subparagraph (1)(b)3., the department shall conduct the informal review by a hearing officer designated by the department. Such informal review hearing shall consist solely of an examination by the department of the materials submitted by a law enforcement officer or correctional officer and by the person whose license was suspended, and the presence of an officer or witness is not required.
(5) After completion of the informal review, notice of the department’s decision sustaining, amending, or invalidating the suspension of the driver license of the person whose license was suspended must be provided to such person. Such notice must be mailed to the person at the last known address shown on the department’s records, or to the address provided in the law enforcement officer’s report if such address differs from the address of record, within 21 days after the expiration of the temporary permit issued pursuant to subsection (1) or subsection (3).
(6)(a) If the person whose license was suspended requests a formal review, the department must schedule a hearing within 30 days after such request is received by the department and must notify the person of the date, time, and place of the hearing.
(b) Such formal review hearing shall be held before a hearing officer designated by the department, and the hearing officer shall be authorized to administer oaths, examine witnesses and take testimony, receive relevant evidence, issue subpoenas for the officers and witnesses identified in documents provided under paragraph (2)(a), regulate the course and conduct of the hearing, question witnesses, and make a ruling on the suspension. The hearing officer may conduct hearings using communications technology. The party requesting the presence of a witness shall be responsible for the payment of any witness fees and for notifying in writing the state attorney’s office in the appropriate circuit of the issuance of the subpoena. If the person who requests a formal review hearing fails to appear and the hearing officer finds such failure to be without just cause, the right to a formal hearing is waived and the suspension shall be sustained.
(c) The failure of a subpoenaed witness to appear at the formal review hearing is not grounds to invalidate the suspension. If a witness fails to appear, a party may seek enforcement of a subpoena under paragraph (b) by filing a petition for enforcement in the circuit court of the judicial circuit in which the person failing to comply with the subpoena resides or by filing a motion for enforcement in any criminal court case resulting from the driving or actual physical control of a motor vehicle that gave rise to the suspension under this section. A failure to comply with an order of the court shall result in a finding of contempt of court. However, a person is not in contempt while a subpoena is being challenged.
(d) The department must, within 7 working days after a formal review hearing, send notice to the person of the hearing officer’s decision as to whether sufficient cause exists to sustain, amend, or invalidate the suspension.
(7) In a formal review hearing under subsection (6) or an informal review hearing under subsection (4), the hearing officer shall determine by a preponderance of the evidence whether sufficient cause exists to sustain, amend, or invalidate the suspension. The scope of the review shall be limited to the following issues:
(a) If the license was suspended for driving with an unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher:
1. Whether the law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe that the person whose license was suspended was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or chemical or controlled substances.
2. Whether the person whose license was suspended had an unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher as provided in s. 316.193.
(b) If the license was suspended for refusal to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test:
1. Whether the law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe that the person whose license was suspended was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or chemical or controlled substances.
2. Whether the person whose license was suspended refused to submit to any such test after being requested to do so by a law enforcement officer or correctional officer.
3. Whether the person whose license was suspended was told that if he or she refused to submit to such test his or her privilege to operate a motor vehicle would be suspended for a period of 1 year or, in the case of a second or subsequent refusal, for a period of 18 months.
(8) Based on the determination of the hearing officer pursuant to subsection (7) for both informal hearings under subsection (4) and formal hearings under subsection (6), the department shall:
(a) Sustain the suspension of the person’s driving privilege for a period of 1 year for a first refusal, or for a period of 18 months if the driving privilege of such person has been previously suspended as a result of a refusal to submit to such tests, if the person refused to submit to a lawful breath, blood, or urine test. The suspension period commences on the date of issuance of the notice of suspension.
(b) Sustain the suspension of the person’s driving privilege for a period of 6 months for a blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher, or for a period of 1 year if the driving privilege of such person has been previously suspended under this section as a result of driving with an unlawful alcohol level. The suspension period commences on the date of issuance of the notice of suspension.
(9) A request for a formal review hearing or an informal review hearing shall not stay the suspension of the person’s driver license. If the department fails to schedule the formal review hearing within 30 days after receipt of the request therefor, the department shall invalidate the suspension. If the scheduled hearing is continued at the department’s initiative or the driver enforces the subpoena as provided in subsection (6), the department shall issue a temporary driving permit that shall be valid until the hearing is conducted if the person is otherwise eligible for the driving privilege. Such permit may not be issued to a person who sought and obtained a continuance of the hearing. The permit issued under this subsection shall authorize driving for business or employment use only.
(10) A person whose driver license is suspended under subsection (1) or subsection (3) may apply for issuance of a license for business or employment purposes only if the person is otherwise eligible for the driving privilege pursuant to s. 322.271.
(a) If the suspension of the driver license of the person for failure to submit to a breath, urine, or blood test is sustained, the person is not eligible to receive a license for business or employment purposes only, pursuant to s. 322.271, until 90 days have elapsed after the expiration of the last temporary permit issued. If the driver is not issued a 10-day permit pursuant to this section or s. 322.64 because he or she is ineligible for the permit and the suspension for failure to submit to a breath, urine, or blood test is not invalidated by the department, the driver is not eligible to receive a business or employment license pursuant to s. 322.271 until 90 days have elapsed from the date of the suspension.
(b) If the suspension of the driver license of the person relating to unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher is sustained, the person is not eligible to receive a license for business or employment purposes only pursuant to s. 322.271 until 30 days have elapsed after the expiration of the last temporary permit issued. If the driver is not issued a 10-day permit pursuant to this section or s. 322.64 because he or she is ineligible for the permit and the suspension relating to unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher is not invalidated by the department, the driver is not eligible to receive a business or employment license pursuant to s. 322.271 until 30 days have elapsed from the date of the suspension.
(11) The formal review hearing may be conducted upon a review of the reports of a law enforcement officer or a correctional officer, including documents relating to the administration of a breath test or blood test or the refusal to take either test or the refusal to take a urine test. However, as provided in subsection (6), the driver may subpoena the officer or any person who administered or analyzed a breath or blood test. If the arresting officer or the breath technician fails to appear pursuant to a subpoena as provided in subsection (6), the department shall invalidate the suspension.
(12) The formal review hearing and the informal review hearing are exempt from the provisions of chapter 120. The department may adopt rules for the conduct of reviews under this section.
(13) A person may appeal any decision of the department sustaining a suspension of his or her driver license by a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court in the county wherein such person resides or wherein a formal or informal review was conducted pursuant to s. 322.31. However, an appeal shall not stay the suspension. A law enforcement agency may appeal any decision of the department invalidating a suspension by a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court in the county wherein a formal or informal review was conducted. This subsection shall not be construed to provide for a de novo review.
(14)(a) The decision of the department under this section or any circuit court review thereof may not be considered in any trial for a violation of s. 316.193, and a written statement submitted by a person in his or her request for departmental review under this section may not be admitted into evidence against him or her in any such trial.
(b) The disposition of any related criminal proceedings does not affect a suspension for refusal to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test imposed under this section.
(15) If the department suspends a person’s license under s. 322.2616, it may not also suspend the person’s license under this section for the same episode that was the basis for the suspension under s. 322.2616.
(16) The department shall invalidate a suspension for driving with an unlawful blood-alcohol level or breath-alcohol level imposed under this section if the suspended person is found not guilty at trial of an underlying violation of s. 316.193.
History.s. 1, ch. 89-525; s. 4, ch. 90-329; s. 20, ch. 91-255; s. 5, ch. 93-124; s. 414, ch. 95-148; s. 2, ch. 95-186; s. 2, ch. 96-272; s. 11, ch. 96-330; s. 38, ch. 97-96; s. 43, ch. 99-248; s. 14, ch. 2001-196; ss. 20, 85, ch. 2005-164; s. 45, ch. 2006-290; s. 45, ch. 2007-5; s. 6, ch. 2010-163; s. 35, ch. 2010-223; s. 48, ch. 2013-15; s. 57, ch. 2013-160.

F.S. 322.2615 on Google Scholar

F.S. 322.2615 on Casetext

Amendments to 322.2615


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 322.2615
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 322.2615.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. MORRICAL,, 262 So. 3d 865 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Respondent timely requested and received a formal review hearing under section 322.2615, Florida Statutes . . .

C. ELSO, v. STATE, 260 So. 3d 489 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . not request a second formal review hearing after remand and, because there is no language in section 322.2615 . . . (6)(a) and 322.2615(9), Florida Statutes (2017), to quash his license suspension instead of remanding . . . Accordingly, it concluded that the remedy Petitioner sought under section 322.2615(9), i.e., invalidation . . . The only statutory trigger outlined in section 322.2615(6)(a) that requires the Department to schedule . . . As such, we find the circuit court's application of section 322.2615(6)(a) in Petitioner's first-tier . . .

B. WIGGINS, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 209 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 2017)

. . . rephrase as follows: WHETHER A CIRCUIT COURT CONDUCTING FIRST-TIER CER-TIORARI REVIEW UNDER SECTION 322.2615 . . . answer the rephrased certified question in the affirmative and hold that in this context of section 322.2615 . . . Statutory Background Section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, provides for the suspension of one’s driving . . . Section 322.2615 is to be read in pari materia with section 316.1932, Florida Department of Highway-Safety . . . A court conducting section 322.2615 first-tier certiora-ri review faces constitutional questions that . . . courts conducting first-tier certiorari review of administrative license suspensions because section 322.2615 . . . nonlawyer, the same does not hold true for the questions of constitutional law that arise under section 322.2615 . . . The majority also justifies its rejection of Dusseau in the context of review under section 322.2615 . . . District and hold that Dusseau is applicable in the context of first-tier certiorari review under section 322.2615 . . .

FUTCH, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 189 So. 3d 131 (Fla. 2016)

. . . See §§ 322.2615, 322.64, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. PEACOCK,, 185 So. 3d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . statute provides: A court may not stay the administrative suspension of a driving privilege under s. 322.2615 . . . suspended for one year for refusing to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . We find the Department’s reliance upon Begley misplaced as this case does not involve section 322.2615 . . . Nor does it cite to section 322.271 as it does sections 322.2615 and 322.2616. . . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, v. R. BROWN,, 179 So. 3d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section ¡322.2615). . . . Section 322.2615(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), provides: ,(2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (l . . .

M. OBJIO, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 179 So. 3d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 322.2615(11), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2014), Ob-jio’s driver’s license was suspended, and he . . . In accordance with section 322.2615(6), Objio sought a formal review of the suspension. . . . The hearing officer wanted time to consider this issue because section 322.2615(11) was recently revised . . . Id. § 322.2615(6)(b). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. CANALEJO,, 179 So. 3d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Likewise, DHS is correct that Florida Administrative Code Rules 15A-6.013(2) and section 322.2615(2), . . .

GORDON, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 166 So. 3d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Motor Vehicles (“the Department”) relied on the reports of the arresting officer pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . that claim, relying on the documentary evidence, and approved the license suspension under section 322.2615 . . . Mowry, 794 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); § 322.2615(11), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See, e.g„ §§ 322.2615(8)(a),(b) and 322.271(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. HIRTZEL,, 163 So. 3d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . review of the hearing officer’s factual findings and reweighed the evidence in violation of section 322.2615 . . . 0.185 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath, far above 0.08, the legal limit. §§ 316.193(1)(e); 322.2615 . . . Hirtzel’s driver’s license. § 322.2615(7), Fla. Stat. (2010). Upon Mr. . . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. Stat. (2010); Dusseau v. Metro. Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. LANNING,, 156 So. 3d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . hearing officer’s order suspending the driver’s license of respondent Gregory Lanning pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. WIGGEN,, 152 So. 3d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . DHSMV administratively suspended Wiggen’s driver’s license for six months under section 322.2615(l)(a . . . Wiggen requested a formal administrative review before a DHSMV hearing officer under section 322.2615 . . . Code R. 15A-6013 (2011); see also § 322.2615(7), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . was suspended had an unlawful ... breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or higher as provided in s. 316.193. § 322.2615 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. WIGGINS,, 151 So. 3d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . of the record evidence supported an affirmance of the administrative suspension pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . record to support the hearing officer’s findings as made in the order and that, pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. GAPUTIS,, 148 So. 3d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 322.2615(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . After a formal review hearing, see § 322.2615(6), the Department entered a final order upholding Mr. . . . See §§ 322.2615(14), .31. . . .

FERREI, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 147 So. 3d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 322.2615(1), (6), (14), .31, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

PANKAU, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 147 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 322.2615(1), (6), (14), .31, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. FUTCH,, 142 So. 3d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(1), Florida Statutes (2013), DHSMV placed an administrative refusal suspension . . . Futch requested a formal administrative suspension review hearing under section 322.2615(6), Florida . . . At the hearing, DHSMV submitted the required documents pursuant to section 322.2615(2), Florida Statutes . . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . due process rights afforded a driver when seeking review of a license suspension pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

FORTH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 148 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Dominic Forth’s license to drive was suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(1), Florida Statutes (2011 . . . hearing before a hearing officer employed by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. § 322.2615 . . . Forth sought certiorari review of the hearing officer’s order in the circuit court, §§ 322.2615(14), . . . the circuit court’s remand for further proceedings as meaning that a new formal hearing under section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CORCORAN,, 133 So. 3d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . to impeach any witness, and to rebut the evidence presented against the driver. §§ 822.2615(2) and 322.2615 . . . 1998) (holding that a hearing officer may not quash a subpoena for a fact witness pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . The formal administrative review procedure contemplated by section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2012), . . . In completing the task provided in subsection 322.2615(7), subsection 322.2615(11), Florida Statutes . . . Finally, subsection 322.2615(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), provides guidance to the hearing officer . . .

STATE DHSMV OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BENNETT,, 125 So. 3d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . In accordance with the Code, section 322.2615(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), authorizes an administrative . . . Furthermore, section 322.2615(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), states that “[t]he failure of a subpoenaed . . .

CARRIZOSA, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 124 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . As a result, DHSMV suspended his driver’s license for six months pursuant to section 322.2615(1), Florida . . . Statutes (2010): 322.2615. . . . See § 322.2615(6), (7). . . . See § 322.2615(13); Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(1). . . . We held that section 322.2615(7)(a) limited the scope of administrative review to two issues only: “( . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, v. EDGELL- GALLOWHUR,, 114 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 322.2615(2), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that the only documents required to be in affidavit . . . Section 322.2615(2) provides: Materials submitted to the department by a law enforcement agency or correctional . . . Section 322.2615(11) provides: The formal review hearing may be conducted upon a review of the reports . . . Finally, section 322.2615(12), provides that the formal hearing is “exempt from the provisions of chapter . . . for the initial stop, constitutes a failure to apply the clearly-established provisions of section 322.2615 . . .

KLINKER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 118 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . See § 322.2615(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . . § 322.2615(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . See also § 322.2615(11), Fla. . . . See § 322.2615(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS, v. J. FERNANDEZ,, 114 So. 3d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Fernandez maintained his refusal and his license was suspended administratively pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(6)(b) provides in relevant part: [The] formal review hearing shall be held before a . . . Notably, section 322.2615 offers no direction with respect to the venue of a formal review hearing; it . . . See Freeman, 63 So.3d at 27 (holding that circuit court’s erroneous interpretation of section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(2), Florida Statutes (2011), "[m]aterials submitted to the department by . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, s v. ROBINSON, s, 112 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 2013)

. . . question: WHEN A SUSPENDEE SEEKS FORMAL REVIEW OF A DRIVER’S LICENSE SUSPENSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 322.2615 . . .

ECHTERNACH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 119 So. 3d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . 2)(A)(v): WHEN A SUSPENDEE SEEKS FORMAL REVIEW OF A DRIVER’S LICENSE SUSPENSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. RAMNARINE,, 104 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . 2)(A)(v): WHEN A SUSPENDEE SEEKS FORMAL REVIEW OF A DRIVER’S LICENSE SUSPENSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ROSE,, 105 So. 3d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . His license was suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(1), Florida Statutes (2010). . . . Rose requested a formal hearing under section 322.2615(6), and the hearing officer found that the arresting . . . this state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or chemical or controlled substances.” § 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DELLACAVA,, 100 So. 3d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . As a result, his driver’s license was suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. C. SAXLEHNER,, 96 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 322.2615 provides in pertinent part: (6)(a) If the person whose license was suspended requests . . . See § 322.2615(11), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . See § 322.2615(12), Fla. . . . Neither Spicer nor Chapter 120 applies to the formal review process under section 322.2615 and should . . . See § 322.2615(12), Fla. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CARILLON,, 95 So. 3d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to Chapter 15A-6, Florida Administrative Code, and section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2010) . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ROBINSON,, 93 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . administrative review hearing within thirty days to challenge the suspension of his license under section 322.2615 . . . absence, but offered to continue the hearing so that counsel could enforce the subpoena under section 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(6) outlines the administrative review procedures for a formal review of a driver’s license . . . However, a person is not in contempt while a subpoena is being challenged. § 322.2615(6)(a), (b), (c) . . . of any action of the hearing officer and the sus-pendee failed to enforce the subpoena under section 322.2615 . . .

RUDOLPH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 107 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Rudolph’s challenge to the lawfulness of her stop by the Port Authority officer pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

ARENAS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 90 So. 3d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 322.2615(7)(b)(l)-(S). . . . See § 322.2615(13). . . . The two rephrased questions were: Can the DHSMV suspend a driver’s license under section 322.2615, Florida . . . determine if sufficient cause exists to sustain the suspension of a driver’s license under section 322.2615 . . . In 2006, section 322.2615(7)(b) provided as follows: (b) If the license was suspended for refusal to . . .

F. McLAUGHLIN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 128 So. 3d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . McLaughlin’s driver’s license suspension under section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), for failing . . .

NADER, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 87 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 2012)

. . . and Procedure to Request Administrative Review In conjunction with the implied consent law, section 322.2615 . . . that “the suspension period shall commence on the date of issuance of the notice of suspension.” § 322.2615 . . . Subsection 322.2615(2) then requires that the law enforcement officer shall forward to the department . . . Section 322.2615 further provides for the method by which the driver can request review of the license . . . This subsection shall not be construed to provide for a de novo appeal.” § 322.2615(13), Fla. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. IVEY,, 73 So. 3d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 322.2615, Fla. Stat. (2010). It was the second time she had refused such a test. . . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . See § 322.2615(7)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). . . .

STATE v. LEYVA,, 65 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Vehicles appeals a circuit court order to the Department to enforce a subpoena issued, pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . The procedure to enforce ’noncompliance by a witness with the subpoena issued pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . However, a person is not in contempt while a subpoena is being challenged. § 322.2615(6)(c) Fla. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CHERRY,, 91 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 322.2615(13), Fla. Stat. (2010). In that petition, Ms. . . . Accordingly, the Department failed to meet its burden as to the required element under section 322.2615 . . . a period of 1 year or, in the case of a second or subsequent refusal, for a period of 18 months. § 322.2615 . . . of the evidence whether sufficient cause exists to sustain, amend, or invalidate the suspension.” § 322.2615 . . . See § 322.2615(11), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. Admin. Code R. 15A-6.013 (5); Dep’t of High. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. HERNANDEZ, v., 74 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 2011)

. . . can be suspended by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) under section 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, the statute before us in this case governing the suspension of an . . . Stat.; see also § 322.2615(4), (6), Fla. Stat. . . . (Emphasis added). § 322.2615(7)(b)2„ Fla. Stat. . . . Section 322.2615 was minimally revised in 2007 and 2010. . . . The contrary view adopted by a majority of this Court effectively rewrites the text of section 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(7) expressly limits the issues which may be considered by the hearing officer in a proceeding . . . The plurality transgresses the limits set forth in the text by reading back into section 322.2615(7) . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. FREEMAN,, 63 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . We find the Second District’s analysis in Nader to be persuasive for purposes of section 322.2615 when . . . granted; opinion of October 19, 2010, and order denying rehearing of December 17, 2010, quashed. . § 322.2615 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. L. EDENFIELD,, 58 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . to subpoena and then cross examine the author of inspection reports, this court in Lee cited section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. AUSTER,, 52 So. 3d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . certiorari review of a decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Her driver’s license was subsequently suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a) for refusal to submit . . . See § 322.2615(6)00, Fla. Stat. (2008). Here, Caner was identified in these documents. . . . Thus, pursuant to section 322.2615(7)(b), the scope of review was limited to the issues of: 1. . . . Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 4 So.3d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) that section 322.2615( . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BERNE,, 49 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Berne subsequently requested and received a formal review hearing pursuant to section 322.2615(6)(a), . . . See § 322.2615(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005); see also Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. . . . is only required to establish an unlawful blood-alcohol level by a preponderance of the evidence. § 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(11), Florida Statutes (2005), specifically provides that the formal review hearing may . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ICAZA,, 37 So. 3d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . hearing officer’s order that sustained the suspension of Daniel Icaza’s driver’s license under section 322.2615 . . . Consequently, the officer, on behalf of the Department, suspended Icaza’s license pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Icaza invoked his right to formal review of that suspension under section 322.2615(l)(b)(3), and the . . . We emphasize at this juncture that the provisions of the 2007 version of section 322.2615 did not require . . . Despite the fact that the circuit court applied the outdated 2005 version of section 322.2615, it arrived . . .

E. FOLDEN, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 322.2615, 316.1932(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). REVERSED AND REMANDED. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. U. J. HOFER,, 5 So. 3d 766 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Hofer exercised his right to formal review, see § 322.2615(l)(b)(3), Fla. . . . Hofer’s license for refusal to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test under section 322.2615. C. . . . Hofer noted that according to section 322.2615, in any implied consent case, the license suspension is . . . In Conahan, the Fifth District found that section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (1991), afforded drivers . . . Hofer briefly mentioned the relationship between sections 316.1932 and 322.2615. . . .

R. LEE, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 4 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The hearing officer denied petitioner’s request, citing section 322.2615(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2007 . . . See § 322.2615(2) & (6)(b), Fla. Stat (2007); Fla. Admin. Code R. 15A-6.012(1). . . . reports are not among the specific documents listed in section 322.2615(2) in connection with which . . . When formal review is requested, section 322.2615(6)(b) authorizes the hearing officer “to administer . . . See § 322.2615(2) (emphasis added). . . .

YANKEY, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 6 So. 3d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 322.2615(6). As part of that review, Ms. . . . The Department refused to issue this subpoena, asserting that section 322.2615(6)(b) did not authorize . . . See § 322.2615(13). . . . These documents must include “the results of any breath or blood test.” § 322.2615(2). . . . Section 322.2615(1)(b)(3) permits a driver whose license has been administratively suspended in this . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ESCOBIO,, 6 So. 3d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . held that the Department departed from the essential requirements of the law by interpreting section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), the hearing officer’s review is limited . . . This issue centers on recent amendments to section 322.2615. . . . Prior to October 1, 2006, section 322.2615(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), required a law enforcement . . . Under section 322.2615(7)(a), the scope of this formal review was limited to three issues: (1) whether . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. NADER, v., 4 So. 3d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 316.1932(l)(a)(l)(a), 322.2615(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). Both Ms. Nader and Ms. . . . Both women then sought certiorari review in the circuit court, see § 322.2615(13), arguing again that . . . Section 322.2615 then provides: (l)(a) A law enforcement officer or correctional officer shall, on behalf . . . Under section 322.2615(7)(b), a formal review hearing requires the hearing officer to consider 1. . . . Sections 316.1932(l)(a)(l)(a) and 322.2615 plainly require the suspension of a driver’s license when . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. MAFFETT,, 1 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Feb.20, 2009), an opinion we issue simultaneously with this opinion, we have concluded that section 322.2615 . . .

KIRPALANI, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 997 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . review of the suspension with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), the hearing officer found that Deputy Maris . . . remedy to seek review of an administrative order sustaining the suspension of a driver’s license. § 322.2615 . . . Her license was suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(b)(l)(b), which mandates a six month suspension . . . Section 322.2615(l)(b)(l)(a) mandates a longer suspension of at least one year where a driver refuses . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ELIAS,, 997 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . His driving privileges were immediately suspended as required by section 322.2615, Florida Statutes ( . . . As section 322.2615 expressly provides, circuit courts are authorized to enforce or compel compliance . . . court of the judicial circuit in which the person failing to comply with the subpoena resides.... § 322.2615 . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 995 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The hearing officer determined that the scope of the hearing, pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes . . . Section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2007), provides in pertinent part, (7) In a formal review hearing . . . Prior to October 1, 2006, section 322.2615 provided as well that a DHSMV hearing officer, in a proceeding . . . Section 322.2615 was amended prior to Hernandez’ arrest to delete this subsection. . . . court was not unmindful of a legislative staff analysis which indicated that the amendment of section 322.2615 . . .

F. McLAUGHLIN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 2 So. 3d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . that the lawfulness of a driver’s arrest is relevant in a postsuspension hearing authorized by section 322.2615 . . . McLaughlin exercised his right to formal review as authorized by section 322.2615(l)(b)(3), Florida Statutes . . . The hearing officer explained that section 322.2615(7)(b) did not authorize him to address the lawfulness . . . McLaughlin argued that section 322.2615 conflicted with section 316.1932, because the latter did not . . . THE SCOPE OF THE HEARING OFFICER’S REVIEW UNDER SECTION 322.2615 The circuit court’s denial of Mr. . . .

KIRPALANI, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 991 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . review of the suspension with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), the hearing officer found that Deputy Maris . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SARMIENTO,, 989 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . influence, he requested a formal administrative review of his license suspension pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

GUPTON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY,, 987 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 322.2615(2), Florida Statutes (2007), requires the arresting officer to submit to the Department . . . the attestor’s status was not specified, the document is not an “affidavit,” as required by section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LUTTRELL,, 983 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . DUI, Luttrell requested a formal administrative review of her license suspension pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. C. PELHAM,, 979 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Our resolution of this case thus requires us to consider the effect of section 322.2615, as amended. . . . the driver’s license of any person who refuses to submit to a “lawful ” breath test. § 322.2615(l)(a . . . Petitioner responds that sections 316.1932 and 322.2615 should be read in isolation because they are . . . This conclusion is supported by the fact that section 322.2615 only permits suspension “pursuant to” . . . (Emphasis added). § 322.2615(7) (b)2., Fla. Stat. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BOESCH,, 979 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 322.2615(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006) (emphasis added). . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, v. S. WELLMAN,, 976 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Stewart, 625 So.2d 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (upholding subsection 322.2615(7)). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DeGROOT,, 971 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 322.2615(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . upon the language of rule 15A-6.013(2) and had ignored the patently permissive language of section 322.2615 . . . requested by a law enforcement officer or correctional officer and that the person refused to submit.” § 322.2615 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. L. LANKFORD,, 956 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 322.2615, Fla. Stat. (2004); Fla. R. Admin. P. 15A-6.013. . . . Section 322.2615(6)(c) and rule 15A-6.013(5) authorize a party to enforce a subpoena duces tecum in circuit . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. WEJEBE,, 954 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Safety and Motor Vehicles’ administrative order suspending Jose Wejebe’s driver’s license under section 322.2615 . . . See § 322.2615, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . Wejebe sought formal review of this six-month suspension, as provided by section 322.2615, Florida Statutes . . .

KUBASAK, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 957 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . administrative driver’s license suspension proceeding from the necessity of complying with section 322.2615 . . .

STATE FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. TIDEY,, 946 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . privileges of all parties be reinstated, even though such privileges were suspended by operation of section 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(6)(b), Florida Statutes, authorizes the department to conduct formal review hearings . . . where relief is available, here, by motion to recuse once the officer’s conduct occurs under section 322.2615 . . . (6)(a), Florida Statutes, or by writ of certiorari upon an adverse decision pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, driving privileges are automatically suspended following . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. STENMARK,, 941 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 322.2615, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . See § 322.2615(7)(a)(2) (requiring hearing officer to determine whether person was placed under lawful . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. WILLIAMS,, 937 So. 2d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The HO concluded that the Department had satisfied section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, and denied Williams . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. TRAUTH,, 937 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Trauth and Llamas each requested a formal administrative hearing pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida . . .

R. WILLIAMSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 933 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . At a hearing conducted pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2005), the department made the . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. GARCIA,, 935 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 322.2615(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . Thereafter, pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (2005), Garcia filed a request for . . . the suspension, the law enforcement officer submitted documentary evidence, as required by section 322.2615 . . . who administered the breath test timely filed his paperwork with the Department pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. D. ROBERTS,, 938 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Procedural Background This holding arises out of proceedings instituted by Roberts pursuant to sections 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(7)(b) provides that at such a hearing, the hearing officer is confined to determining . . . probable cause to believe that the person was driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages. § 322.2615 . . . instant case included the citation for DUI, the officer’s arrest affidavit, and the refusal forms. § 322.2615 . . . recognized many years ago, which is that the principal features of the procedure established by section 322.2615 . . .

SCHWARTZ, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 920 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 322.2615 (7)(b) of the Florida Statutes (2004) expressly states that during a formal review of . . . that the validity of a stop which ultimately leads to a DUI arrest cannot be challenged in a section 322.2615 . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (section 92.525 “verified” document satisfied affidavit requirement of section 322.2615 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. PIPKIN,, 927 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . His license was suspended for one year pursuant to section 322.2615(b)l.a of the Florida Statutes. . . .

TYNAN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 909 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Tynan requested a formal hearing, pursuant to section 322.2615 Florida Statutes. . . . came too late, more than 30 days following her request for a formal hearing as required by sections 322.2615 . . . (6)(a) and 322.2615(9), Florida Statutes, and presents her argument to this court in this proceeding. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. GRIFFIN,, 909 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . question of whether the use of non-lawyers as hearing officers, in formal hearings pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes, these motorists had their driver’s licenses automatically . . . Each motorist sought formal review before a hearing officer, pursuant to section 322.2615(6), Florida . . . purpose of resolving the conflict; to wit, determining whether the use of non-lawyers under section 322.2615 . . . The statutory scheme of section 322.2615(6), Florida Statutes, allows for a motorist to request a formal . . . Judge Ramirez’s critique of the statutory procedures of section 322.2615 is well taken and provides thought-provoking . . .

RUIZ, v. STATE, 908 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . DCA 1993) (finding that section 92.525 “verified” document satisfied affidavit requirement of section 322.2615 . . .

GURRY, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY,, 902 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Gurry then sought certiorari review in the circuit court, pursuant to section 322.2615(13), Florida Statutes . . . The citation indicated Gurry’s license was suspended for a violation of section 322.2615, Florida Statutes . . . Section 322.2615(6)(b), Florida Statutes, provides: “Such formal review hearing shall be held before . . .

GREEN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 905 So. 2d 922 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . In essence, Petitioner made the following two arguments: (1) the plain language of section 322.2615(7 . . . It is evident that in enacting section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, the legislature intended to suspend . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. M. PATRICK,, 895 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The court indicated in its order that because the plain language of subparagraphs 322.2615(7)(a)l.-3. . . . Paragraph 322.2615(l)(b) is the problematic part of the statute. . . . The next subsection, subsection 322.2615(2), requires the law enforcement officer to notify the DMV of . . . Therefore, despite the fact that the notification provisions of sub-subsection 322.2615(l)(b)l.b. do . . . Whether the person had an unlawful blood-alcohol level as provided in s. 316.193. § 322.2615(7)(a)l.- . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. McCLANE,, 891 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Officer Long then suspended McClane’s driving privilege pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BRANDENBURG,, 891 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . SERVED A DRIVER’S LICENSE SUSPENSION AS A RESULT OF HER ARREST FOR DUI PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 322.2615 . . . The arresting officer suspended her license for 180 days, pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a). . . . Section 322.2615(15) recognizes that multiple periods of suspension, on arrest, should not be imposed . . . See § 322.2615(l)(b)l.b„ Fla. Stat. . . . . The remainder of the statute refers to revocation. . § 322.2615(14), Fla. . . .

S. JACKSON, v. STATE, 881 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Fla. 95-40 (1995)(document verified under section 92.525 is not affidavit within meaning of section 322.2615 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES, v. POSSATI,, 866 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . His driver’s license was suspended under section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001). . . . See § 322.2615, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . privilege of ... a person who has refused to submit to a breath ... test authorized by s. 316.1932.” § 322.2615 . . . a period of 1 year or, in the case of a second or subsequent refusal, for a period of 18 months. § 322.2615 . . .

DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SWEGHEIMER,, 847 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . In a formal review pursuant to section 322.2615(7), Florida Statutes, the hearing officer reviewed a . . . Section 322.2615(11), Florida Statutes, allows the hearing officer to conduct a formal review “upon a . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. WHITLEY,, 846 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Whitley requested a formal review of his driver’s license suspension pursuant to section 322.2615(6), . . . In accordance with section 322.2615(7), which defines the scope of the formal hearing, the hearing officer . . . according to the circuit court’s reasoning, be contrary to the requirements of sections 316.1932 and 322.2615 . . . Probable Cause There is nothing in section 316.1932(l)(a)l. or section 322.2615(7)(a) that requires that . . . We likewise find nothing in the provisions of section 322.2615(7) that requires an individual to be arrested . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CURRIER,, 824 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 322.2615(7), Florida Statutes (2001), directs the HO to determine whether a preponderance of . . . This evidence was appropriately admitted pursuant to section 322.2615(2), which directs an arresting . . . officer to submit various documents to the Department, and section 322.2615(11), which permits “[t]he . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SNELSON,, 817 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Snelson’s license had been suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), based . . . The arresting officer also timely filed paperwork pursuant to section 322.2615(2) and rule 15A-6.013( . . . Section 322.2615, which granted Mr. . . . . § 322.2615(2)(a) (emphasis added). . . . also submit a copy of a videotape of the field sobriety test or the attempt to administer such test. § 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. PITTS,, 815 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 322.2615, Florida Statutes Under section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (2000), a law enforcement . . . The person arrested may request an informal or formal review. § 322.2615(4)(5). . . . . § 322.2615(6)(a). . . . .” § 322.2615(6)(b). . . . Id.; see also § 322.2615(7)(a). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BELLO,, 813 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Bello’s driving privilege was then suspended for his refusal to take a breath test pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . Department for an administrative formal review of his driver’s license suspension pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . See § 322.2615(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . or higher, the department shall suspend the person’s driver’s license pursuant to subsection (3). § 322.2615 . . . Section 322.2615(l)(b)(3) provides: The driver may request a formal or informal review of the suspension . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. ALLISTON,, 813 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 322.2615(1)(b)(3). An administrative hearing officer conducted a hearing on June 14, 2000. . . . Pursuant to section 322.2615(11), the formal review hearing for this type of license suspension may be . . . Section 322.2615(11) then provides that “the driver may subpoena the officer or any person who administered . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SILVA,, 806 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . who administered the breath test timely filed his paperwork with the Department pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. JEFFREY NEFF, 804 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The facts of Lamb’s arrest, as adduced at the formal review hearing held pursuant to section 322.2615 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. STEVENS,, 820 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Stevens’ driver’s license was suspended pursuant to section 322.2615(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes (1999 . . . Stevens requested a formal review of his suspension as provided for in section 322.2615(6) of the Florida . . .

HINMAN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, 820 So. 2d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 322.2615(l)(a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Department to suspend a person’s driver’s license . . . See § 322.2615(6)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . Section 322.2615(14), Florida Statutes, provides: [T]he decision of the department under this section . . . Section 322.2615, Florida Statutes, took effect October 10, 1990.. . . . Section 322.2615(14) provides “the decision of the department under this section shall- not be considered . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. K. DEHART,, 799 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . De-hart a DUI citation, and her driving privileges were automatically suspended pursuant to section 322.2615 . . . The deputy sheriff timely filed his paperwork with DHSMV as mandated by section 322.2615(2) of the Florida . . .

VICHICH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 799 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 322.2615, .2616, Fla. . . . When a driver's license is suspended by an arresting officer, sections 322.2615 and 322.2616 provide . . .