Cases from cite.case.law:

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. MORRICAL,, 262 So. 3d 865 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 322.31, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SPERBERG,, 257 So. 3d 560 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes (2018), provides that "final orders and rulings of the [Department of . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LOPEZ,, 188 So. 3d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Pursuant to section 322.31 of the Florida Statutes, Lopez had thirty days to challenge this final order . . .

FORTH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 148 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Forth sought certiorari review of the hearing officer’s order in the circuit court, §§ 322.2615(14), 322.31 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. MELENDEZ,, 132 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . the circuit court within 30 calendar days of [the] order by following the procedure specified in § 322.31 . . .

BRADSHEER K. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 20 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Id. at 514 (citing § 322.31, Fla. Stat.). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CRANE,, 10 So. 3d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . should have sought certiorari review of the Department’s action by the Circuit Court pursuant to section 322.31 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. ELIAS,, 997 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes (2007), expressly provides for certio-rari review in the appellate division . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. D. ROBERTS,, 938 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . out of proceedings instituted by Roberts pursuant to sections 322.2615(6), (7), and (15) and section 322.31 . . .

DUCKWORTH, v. STATE, 923 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . 322.271 (providing for administrative hearing on suspension, cancellation or revocation of license) or 322.31 . . . provisions of § 119.07(1), except that the reports may be admitted in proceedings under § .322.271 or § 322.31 . . . evidence in any trial, except that the reports may be admitted in proceedings of Section 322.271 or 322.31 . . . (emphasis added), the sole exception being for administrative proceedings under sections 322.271 or 322.31 . . .

O. DICKENSON v. AULTMAN,, 905 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The Department further argues that, pursuant to section 322.31, Florida Statutes (2003), its decision . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. R. ALLISTON,, 813 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Alliston sought certiorari review with the circuit court pursuant to section 322.31, Florida Statutes . . .

VICHICH, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 799 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . the DHSMV’s order by means of a petition for certiorari to the circuit court as authorized by section 322.31 . . . a record review shall not toll the time in which to file a writ of certiorari in accordance with S. 322.31 . . . may be initiated within 30 days of the date of this order by following the procedure specified in S. 322.31 . . . However, section 322.31, Florida Statutes (1999), provides: The final orders and rulings of the department . . . Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 709 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (relying on amendments to section 322.31 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. DAVIS, Jr., 775 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Davis filed a petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to section 322.31, Florida Statutes, arguing that . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, v. PARSONS,, 719 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the license suspension by petitioning for certiorari review in the circuit court, pursuant to section 322.31 . . . Section 322.31 provides: Right of review.' — The final orders and rulings of the department wherein any . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER S LICENSES,, 709 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . a record review shall not toll the time in which to file a writ of certiorari in accordance with § 322.31 . . . Florida Statutes § 322.27(7) and § 322.31 (1997) provide that review of a final order revoking a driver . . . Laws of Florida chapter 78-95, section 20, which made the following addition to Florida Statutes § 322.31 . . . to support that proposition and it does not explain away the contrary language that was added to § 322.31 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. SMITH,, 687 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes (1993), establishes that review of driver’s license suspensions by the . . .

DAVIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 660 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . a record review shall not toll the time in which to file a writ of certiorari in accordance with S. 322.31 . . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes (1993), provides that orders denying, cancelling, suspending or revoking . . . of the DUI Evaluator made at [the] appeal hearing” constituted a final order “of the department.” § 322.31 . . . Final Order of the Department Under section 322.31, Florida Statutes (1993), review is available in circuit . . . the Director of DHSMV’s DUI Programs Section, should be deemed the final order “of the department.” § 322.31 . . .

MELKONIAN, v. GOLDMAN,, 647 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Melkonian sought certiorari review of that decision in the Circuit Court under section 322.31, Florida . . .

BUCHBAUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 77 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Section 322.31, Fla. Stat. (1989). Petitioner’s App., A-4 and A-5. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. S. SCOTT,, 583 So. 2d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 322.2615(13) provides for appeal from the Department’s decision pursuant to section 322.31. . . . Section 322.31 provides: Right of review. — The final orders and rulings of the department wherein any . . . The court held section 322.31 unconstitutional as applied to any non-Florida resident whose driver’s . . . The court reasoned that section 322.31 denies nonresidents access to the courts, due process of law, . . . Here section 322.31 provides for review by the circuit court. . . .

O CONNOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 49 Fla. Supp. 2d 201 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Florida Statutes § 322.31 provides that final orders and rulings of the department wherein . . . such . . . Clearly, just because §§ 322.2615(13) and 322.31 are inartfully drafted, does not mean that the Courts . . . county wherein such person resides or wherein a formal or informal review was conducted pursuant to § 322.31 . . . It is the opinion of this Court that the proper interpretation of § 322.2615(13) and § 322.31 is that . . . United States Constitution, because the referenced language in subsection (13) to Florida Statute § 322.31 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. HAGAR,, 581 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court challenging the revocation order pursuant to section 322.31 . . .

IN RE CONTEMPT OF BONNIE HOWELL, v. TELUSME, 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 137 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . Pursuant to Section 322.31 Florida Statutes (1987), final orders and rulings of the department where . . .

DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES, v. SHENK,, 509 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . order of the circuit court granting appellee’s petition for writ of cer-tiorari pursuant to section 322.31 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. BELL,, 505 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The circuit court, reviewing the Department’s order by certiorari as authorized in section 322.31, Florida . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES v. SPELLS,, 502 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . right to seek certiorari review of the department’s actions in the circuit court pursuant to section 322.31 . . . decision, the appellant could have then sought certiorari review in the circuit court under section 322.31 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, v. VOGT,, 489 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . should have sought certiorari review of the Department’s action by the Circuit Court pursuant to section 322.31 . . .

MELLON, v. CANNON,, 482 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes, provides in substance that all orders of the department revoking licenses . . . Thereafter, the Department moved for rehearing and argued that section 322.31 was the driver’s exclusive . . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes, provides only for a certiorari review of final orders and rulings of . . . Therefore, the remedy by certiorari provided in section 322.31, Florida Statutes, was inadequate to give . . . present issues and evidence, that Corbin was entitled to have reviewed by certiorari under section 322.31 . . . this and had thirty days within which to seek certiorari review by the circuit court under section 322.31 . . .

WINGATE, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 442 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 322.31, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES, v. PURDUM,, 400 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . In statutory certiorari proceedings pursuant to § 322.31, Florida Statutes (1979), the circuit court . . .

W. KEITH, s v. J. CORBIN,, 346 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 322.31, Florida Statutes (1975), provides: “Right of review — The final orders and rulings of . . . us, Corbin not only failed to seek review by petition for writ of certiorari as required by Section 322.31 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES, v. ADAMS,, 338 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . In apparent conflict with the above statute, § 322.31, Fla.Stat. (1975), provides as follows: “The final . . .

GALLOWAY, v. STATE, 305 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 322.31 denominates certiorari • as the appropriate method of seeking review. . . . with directions to treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari within the meaning of Fla.Stat. § 322.31 . . .

AKINS, v. STATE, 249 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . § 322.31 F.S.A. provides the method of review of an order or ruling of the Department of Motor Vehicles . . .

GAUSE, v. H. N. KIRKMAN, C. W. a NICKEL, v. H. N. KIRKMAN, C. W. a, 178 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 322.31, F.S., F.S.A., provides: “Right of review.- — -The final orders and rulings of the department . . .

E. HIGGINS, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, 138 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Section 322.31, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., giving a right to petition the circuit court for a hearing de novo . . .

JONES, v. H. N. KIRKMAN,, 138 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1962)

. . . Pursuant to Section 322.31, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., Jones sought review of the suspension order in . . . By Section 322.31, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., any final adverse ruling by the Department may be subj ect . . .

THORNHILL v. KIRKMAN,, 62 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1953)

. . . It provides for a hearing, Section 322.31(1, 2), F.S.A., and for revocation of one’s license on showing . . .

AMERICAN INS. CO. v. LUCAS,, 38 F. Supp. 926 (W.D. Mo. 1941)

. . . the Companies and to the Trustees, i. e., (1) $613,918.21 out of the impoundings alone; and (2) $327,-322.31 . . .

THOMAS BETTS v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20 Ct. Cl. 445 (Ct. Cl. 1885)

. . . he has been paid in full, excepting the following retains: $356.27, $43.72, $6.86, $44.03, $7.30, $322.31 . . .