Cases from cite.case.law:

SPENCE, v. STATE, 150 So. 3d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . only his conviction for driving while his license was permanently revoked, in violation of section 322.341 . . .

VELCOFSKI, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Velcofski appeals his conviction for driving while license permanently revoked pursuant to section 322.341 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 62 So. 3d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . 1099, 1100 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (providing that those persons who committed violation of section 322.341 . . .

RAFINE, v. STATE, 1 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 322.341, Fla. Stat. (2004). See Rodgers v. State, 804 So.2d 480, 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). . . .

STATE v. ECKERMAN,, 997 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . s order dismissing the charges of driving while license permanently revoked in violation of section 322.341 . . .

LAMORE, v. STATE, 983 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 316.193(1), 322.01(15) & 322.341, Fla. Stat. (2006); see also, e.g., Griffin v. . . . Stat. (2006). . § 322.341, Fla. . . .

STATE v. LEUKEL,, 979 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 322.341, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . On 1 June 2006, the State filed a two-count information alleging that Leukel violated section 322.341 . . .

GONSE, v. STATE, 952 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 322.341, Fla. . . .

GALSTON, v. STATE, 943 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . appeals his conviction for driving while his license was permanently revoked, in violation of section 322.341 . . . The term “highway” in section 322.341 is specifically defined in section 322.01(38). . . . “highway” found in section 322.01(38) shall be used to define the term “highway” as used in section 322.341 . . . prohibited the use of the definition in section 633.021(12) to define the term “highway” in section 322.341 . . .

SULLIVAN, v. STATE, 931 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . appellant’s conviction and sentence for driving while license permanently revoked pursuant to section 322.341 . . .

STATE v. ROTHAUSER, a k a, 934 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Franklin Harrison Rothauser with driving while his license was permanently revoked in violation of section 322.341 . . . Section 322.341 was enacted by the legislature as section 13 of chapter 98-223 of the Laws of Florida . . . Rothauser would be correct that section 322.341 was unconstitutional at the time of his offense unless . . . did, however, formally adopt and enact the official statutes of Florida in 2003, including section 322.341 . . . Thus, section 322.341 became a valid statute on July 1, 2003, and was effective on the date of Mr. . . .

STATE v. WALKER,, 923 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . 2)(b)3, Florida Statutes (2005), and driving while license permanently revoked, pursuant to section 322.341 . . .

PASS, a k a a k a v. STATE, 922 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . charged Pass with two counts of driving while license permanently revoked, in violation of section 322.341 . . . correctly contends that he is entitled to have these convictions and sentences vacated because section 322.341 . . . Section 13 of chapter 98-223 created section 322.341, prohibiting driving while a license is permanently . . . Fla. 4th DCA 2003), the Fourth District stated, “Because chapter 98-223, the statute creating section 322.341 . . . The court explained that section 322.341 became “non-existent when the supreme court decided in Critch-field . . .

BAROULETTE, v. McCRAY,, 904 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . §§ 322.264(1)(d), 322.341(5), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 867 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Appellant was convicted of driving after his license had been permanently revoked, a violation of section 322.341 . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 863 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . s conviction as to Count II, felony driving while license permanently suspended pursuant to section 322.341 . . .

S. GILLMAN, v. STATE, 860 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . around February 27, 2002, while his driver’s license was permanently revoked, in violation of section 322.341 . . . Specifically, the motion alleged that sections 2 and 13 of chapter 98-223, Laws of Florida (which created § 322.341 . . . Section 322.341, Florida Statutes, the provision under which Appellant was charged, was added pursuant . . .

SORRELL, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Sorrell appeals his conviction of driving while his license was permanently revoked, contrary to section 322.341 . . . Because the statute in Rodgers is so similar to section 322.341, Rodgers compels the conclusion that . . . Because chapter 98-223, the statute creating section 322.341, is unconstitutional, appellant cannot be . . . The judgment and sentence for the conviction of section 322.341 are reversed. . . . As noted above, section 322.34(5) is similar to section 322.341. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Section 13 creates section 322.341, Florida Statutes which makes it a third degree felony to drive while . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 842 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . of a mandate, pending the Florida Supreme Court’s ruling upon the issue of the validity of section 322.341 . . .

STATE v. D. TUCKER,, 832 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Tucker for driving while his license was permanently revoked in violation of section 322.341, Florida . . . In a case directly on point, this court recently held that in a prosecution under section 322.341, “the . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 830 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Ralph Earl Miller was charged with violating section 322.341, Florida Statutes (2000), which makes it . . . The statute under which Miller was charged in this case, section 322.341, provides- that “[a]ny person . . . Consistent with Fields, we conclude that in a prosecution.under section 322.341, the State may make a . . .

A. McCORMICK, v. STATE, 826 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . that his conviction for driving after his license had been permanently revoked pursuant to section 322.341 . . . Critchfield, decided after the trial judge’s ruling, we held chapter 98-223, which enacted section 322.341 . . . SHARP, W. and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . § 322.341, Fla. Stat. (2001). . § 322.34(5), Fla. . . .

SAWYER, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . third-degree felony, driving after his license had been permanently revoked, which violates section 322.341 . . . Section 322.341 became effective July 1, 1998 by virtue of section 8 of Chapter 98-233, Laws of Florida . . .

WEBB, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The second statute under which Webb was charged was section 322.341, Florida Statutes (2000), which reads . . . Webb’s convictions under sections 322.34(5) and 322.341 did not violate the double jeopardy clause of . . . Sections 322.84(5) and 322.341 do not require identical elements of proof; the former requires evidence . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. P. CRITCHFIELD,, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 13 creates section 322.341, Florida Statutes which makes it a third degree felony to drive while . . .

L. SHAW, v. STATE, 783 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 322.341, Fla.Stat. . § 316.193, Fla.Stat. . . . .