Cases from cite.case.law:

THE LAKE HAMILTON LAKESHORE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. L. NEIDLINGER, d b a s a, 182 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The order of dismissal referenced the following statutes:- sections 327.60(2), 327.65, and 327.04, Florida . . .

IN RE AMPAL- AMERICAN ISRAEL CORP., 534 B.R. 569 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . AroChem, 176 F.3d at 621 (quoting 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 327.04[l][a] (Alan N. . . .

IN RE CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO. INC., 561 B.R. 420 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . Jan. 28, 2013); Project Orange Assocs., 431 B.R. at 375; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[5][a] at 327 . . .

IN RE HANCKEL, III,, 517 B.R. 609 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2014)

. . . adverse interest - regardless of whether a bias or adverse interest exists. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In SONYA D. INTERNATIONAL, INC. In LLC,, 484 B.R. 773 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . of a professional in the conduct of a case under the [Bankruptcy] Code.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . . See 3 Collier ¶ 327.04[9][b] pp. 327-51 to 327-52 (the “majority” approach “imposes an express requirement . . .

In SBMC HEALTHCARE, LLC,, 473 B.R. 871 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . preferential payments, obtaining such a retainer “may not always be possible.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In L. BYINGTON, Jr. N., 454 B.R. 648 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2011)

. . . See generally, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[2][b], at p. 327-34 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

In J. SARAO,, 444 B.R. 496 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2011)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[7][b]. . . .

In JMK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LTD. In In In M., 441 B.R. 222 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . the potential assertion of intercompany claims among the debtor entities.” 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 327.04 . . . See 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 327.04[5]. . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF HEARTLAND Dr. L. v. HEINEMAN, Dr., 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010)

. . . . §§ 28-101, 28-326, 28-327, 28-327.03, 28-327.04, 28-340, 38-2021, pending further ruling by this Court . . .

In PROJECT ORANGE ASSOCIATES, LLC,, 431 B.R. 363 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . See 3 Collier on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 327.04[7][b] (15th ed. rev.2010). . . .

In N. JOHN CUNZOLO ASSOCIATES, INC., 423 B.R. 735 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . predisposition under the circumstances that render such bias against the estate.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In EAST BERRY AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L. P., 419 B.R. 833 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2009)

. . . In re Cook, 223 B.R. at 789 (citing 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[7][b] (Lawrence P. . . .

RITCHIE SPECIAL CREDIT INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. U. S. TRUSTEE,, 415 B.R. 391 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . Id. at 847 (quoting 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[2][a][I], at 327-35 (Alan N. . . .

In PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC,, 416 B.R. 438 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . Rev.2006) ¶ 327.04[9][d]; see also In re J.S. II, L.L.C., 371 B.R. 311, 318 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.2007). . . .

In LEXINGTON HEARTH LAMP AND LEISURE, LLC, In In, 402 B.R. 135 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2009)

. . . at 420; In re McAuley Textile Corp., 11 B.R. 646, 648 (Bankr.D.Me.1981); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In AFI HOLDING, INC. A. v. J. A. M. AFI, 530 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . Michel (In re Crivello), 134 F.3d 831, 835 (7th Cir.1998) (citation omitted); 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . must be judged in the perspective of the particular case and the facts presented.” 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . The definition of “insider” is open-ended because the term is not precise. 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In AFI HOLDING, INC. A. v. J. A. M. AFI, 530 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . Michel (In re Crivello), 134 F.3d 831, 835 (7th Cir.1998) (citation omitted); 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . must be judged in the perspective of the particular case and the facts presented.” 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . The definition of “insider” is open-ended because the term is not precise. 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In RUNNING HORSE, L. L. C., 371 B.R. 446 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . .) ¶ 327.04[9][d](2006). . . . Rev.), ¶ 327.04[9][d] (2006). . . .

In DIVA JEWELRY DESIGN, INC., 367 B.R. 463 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Id., quoting 3 Collier, ¶ 327.04[l][a]. . 977 F.2d 906, 910 (4th Cir.1992). . . . .

HERRANS, O. v. MENDER,, 364 B.R. 463 (D.P.R. 2007)

. . . proposed retention before making a decision.’ ” In re AroChem Corp., 176 F.3d at 621 (quoting 3 Collier, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In AFI HOLDING, INC. A. v. J. A., 355 B.R. 139 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2006)

. . . Michel (In re Crivello), 134 F.3d 831, 835 (7th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted); 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . must be judged in the perspective of the particular case and the facts presented.” 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . . The definition of “insider” is open-ended because the term is not precise. 3 Collier, supra, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., 342 B.R. 122 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . S.D.N.Y.1982); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 327.04[5][a] (“The case law suggests that, rather than disapproving . . .

In ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., 336 B.R. 610 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . re Guy Apple Masonry Contractor, 45 B.R. 160, 166 (Bankr.D.Ariz.1984). . 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In CONGOLEUM CORP. CCI f k a f k a v., 426 F.3d 675 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . .) ¶ 327.04[9][d]. . . . irrespective of the integrity of person or firm under consideration.”); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed.) § 327.04 . . .

In CONGOLEUM CORP. CCI f k a f k a v., 426 F.3d 675 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . .) ¶ 327.04[9][d]. . . . irrespective of the integrity of person or firm under consideration.”); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed.) § 327.04 . . .

In COAL RIVER RESOURCES, INC. v., 321 B.R. 184 (W.D. Va. 2005)

. . . In re Global Marine, 108 B.R. 998, 1004 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1987); see 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[5] . . .

In B. JOHNSON, W. B. W. v., 312 B.R. 810 (E.D. Va. 2004)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[7][b]. . . . relevant part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 75 B.R. 402 (D.Utah 1987)); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . . and Sheeran is not disinterested, are not entirely separate inquiries.”); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . . Section 327(c) contains a limited exception to the general rule of § 327(a).”); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . .

In BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATION, On v. J., 355 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Oct. 6, 1978),. reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6542; Collier ¶327.04[10] (“The purpose of section 327 . . .

In BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATION, On v. J., 355 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Oct. 6, 1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6542; Collier ¶327.04[10] (“The purpose of section 327( . . .

In MEYER, v., 296 B.R. 849 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2003)

. . . These charges resulted in the first minimum monthly payment due in- the amount of $327.04. . . .

In SABRE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 289 B.R. 420 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2003)

. . . Price Waterhouse, 19 F.3d 138 (3rd Cir.1994). .3 Collier on Bankruptcy V 327.04[4][e] at p. 327-42 (Lawrence . . .

In MERCURY, 280 B.R. 35 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . that the attorney to be employed by the estate hold no “adverse interest.” 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶327.04 . . .

In HUNTCO INC,, 288 B.R. 229 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2002)

. . . Al., Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[5][b] (15th ed.2001). . . .

In VOUZIANAS L. v., 259 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . nominate another attorney satisfactory both to the trustee and to the court.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . . Collier, ¶ 327.04[1], at 327-26 (emphasis added and footnotes omitted). . . . King, et al., Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[l][a] (15th ed. rev. 1998)). . . . Id.; see also Collier, ¶ 327.04[l][a]. . . .

In VOUZIANAS L. v., 259 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . nominate another attorney satisfactory both to the trustee and to the court.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04 . . . Collier, ¶ 327.04[1], at 327-26 (emphasis added and footnotes omitted). . . . King, et al., Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[1][a] (15th ed. rev. 1998)). . . . Id.; see also Collier, ¶ 327.04[1][a]. . . .

In MARLAR. v. S., 248 B.R. 577 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2000)

. . . . § 327(c); • Collier on Bankruptcy 3: 327.04[7][a] (15th Rev. Ed.). III. . . .

In BEST CRAFT GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND DESIGN CABINET, INC. v. K. P. Yu, 239 B.R. 462 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . disqualified on any other ground, e.g., an interest adverse to the estate.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In AROCHEM CORPORATION, N. A. L. v. M. COAN,, 176 F.3d 610 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . King, et al., Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[7][b], at 327-56 (15th ed. rev. 1998). . . . circumstances surrounding each case and the proposed retention before making a decision.” 3 Collier, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In AROCHEM CORPORATION, N. A. L. v. M., 176 F.3d 610 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . King, et al., Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[7][b], at 327-56 (15th ed. rev. 1998). . . . circumstances surrounding each case and the proposed retention before making a decision.” 3 Collier, ¶ 327.04 . . .

In VEBELIUNAS,, 231 B.R. 181 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . King, CollieR on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[4][e] at 327-43 (15th ed. rev.1996), defines a disinterested person . . . , 20 B.R. at 334 (quoting Collier Bankruptcy Manual, § 101.13»; Granite, 219 B.R. at 33; Collier, ¶ 327.04 . . . personal interest which might be reflected in his decision concerning estate matters”); Collier, ¶ 327.04 . . . Collier, ¶ 327.04[3][a] at 327-30; see supra n. 11. . . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 327.04[3][a] at 327-30 (15th ed. rev. 1996). . . . .

In L. HAMMOND, D. v. L., 236 B.R. 751 (Bankr. D. Utah 1998)

. . . to Dennison, and ordered the Debtor to pay $163.52 per month per child as support, for a total of $327.04 . . .

In COOK, WLCO, C. R. WINSHIP, v. COOK C., 223 B.R. 782 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1998)

. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 327.04[7][b] (Lawrence P. King ed., 15th ed. rev.1998). . . .

In REYNOLDS, AT T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP. v. REYNOLDS, In L. DAWSON, AT T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP. v. L. DAWSON,, 221 B.R. 828 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1998)

. . . After that one month, AT & T’s minimum payment was $327.04, more than a third of his monthly net income . . .

In CAROLINA SALES CORPORATION, ID, 45 B.R. 750 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1985)

. . . trustee in handling routine matters incident to normal business activity. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy § 327.04 . . .

In ROGER J. AU SON, INC., 65 B.R. 322 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 327.04. (15th ed. 1984) Section 327(b) is intended to facilitate the . . . possession in routine legal matters incident to normal business activity. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 327.04 . . .

BONDHOLDERS, v. POWELL, 190 F.2d 74 (4th Cir. 1951)

. . . This distributive share will be increased to the sum of $327.04 per bond through the allocation of the . . . The total credit however, of $327.04 is less than one-sixth of the total claim, including interest, on . . .

GOOD v. CENTRAL COAL COKE CO., 170 F. 416 (8th Cir. 1909)

. . . July 30, $327.04. Q. Give the next. A. September 20, $3,8(38.32. Q. . . .