Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 327.50 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 327.50 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 327.50

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIV
VESSELS
Chapter 327
VESSEL SAFETY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 327.50
327.50 Vessel safety regulations; equipment and lighting requirements.
(1)(a) The owner and operator of every vessel on the waters of this state shall carry, store, maintain, and use safety equipment in accordance with current United States Coast Guard safety equipment requirements as specified in the Code of Federal Regulations, unless expressly exempted by the commission.
(b) A person may not operate a vessel less than 26 feet in length on the waters of this state unless every person under 6 years of age on board the vessel is wearing a personal flotation device currently approved by the United States Coast Guard and used in accordance with the United States Coast Guard approval label while such vessel is underway. For the purpose of this section, “underway” means at all times except when a vessel is anchored, moored, made fast to the shore, or aground.
(2) No person shall operate a vessel on the waters of this state unless said vessel is equipped with properly serviceable lights and shapes required by the navigation rules.
(3) The use of sirens or flashing, occulting, or revolving lights on any vessel is prohibited, except as expressly provided in the navigation rules or annexes thereto.
(4) The operator of a vessel used in the instruction of a water sport or activity must use an engine cutoff switch and wear an operative link to the switch when a person participating in the water sport or activity is in the water.
History.s. 8, ch. 59-400; s. 13, ch. 63-105; s. 1, ch. 65-361; s. 7, ch. 74-327; s. 8, ch. 81-100; s. 2, ch. 81-114; s. 9, ch. 84-188; s. 2, ch. 86-35; s. 5, ch. 88-133; s. 2, ch. 92-188; s. 463, ch. 95-148; s. 7, ch. 98-308; s. 3, ch. 2015-161; s. 18, ch. 2021-184; s. 4, ch. 2022-197.
Note.Former s. 371.57.

F.S. 327.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 327.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 327.50


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 327.50
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S327.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REMOVED - I: N
S327.50 3 - HEALTH-SAFETY - UNLAWFUL USE OF SIREN/FLASHING LIGHTS ON VES - M: S
S327.50 4 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO USE ENGINE CUT OFF DEVICE - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SIERRA CLUB, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,, 276 F. Supp. 3d 1067 (W.D. Wash. 2017)

. . . Dan Galpefn; $330 • Elisabeth Holmes: $337,50 • Aaron Isherwood: $387.50 • Jessica Yamall Loarie: $327.50 . . .

GILSTER, v. PRIMEBANK,, 884 F. Supp. 2d 811 (N.D. Iowa 2012)

. . . The defendants also note that the highest hourly rate Fiedler has been awarded in the past is $327.50 . . .

In FRAZIN, v. LLP, P. C., 413 B.R. 378 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Moreover, as just noted, Haynes and Boone’s fee request includes a request for recovery of $188,726.50 (327.50 . . .

BRIGGS v. JUPITER HILLS LIGHTHOUSE MARINA,, 9 So. 3d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . added allegations that Jupiter Hills negligently entrusted the boat to Jeff Briggs, violated sections 327.50 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. MARTINEZ- GENOVA,, 959 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 2007)

. . . On February 27, 2004, the balance in Martinez-Genova’s operating account was $327.50. . . .

In A. GRIFFIN, 302 B.R. 1 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2003)

. . . $450,000 appraisal; discovered the appraisal included 3 properties — lake-house plus 2 others 131 min 327.50 . . .

JANSEN, v. PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA,, 898 F. Supp. 625 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . in fees for the service of subpoenas (both subpoenas duces tecum and subpoenas for depositions) and $327.50 . . .

In CUISINARTS, INC., 115 B.R. 744 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1990)

. . . The prepetition expense for H & G fees comes to $36,-327.50, and for BD & G $36,551.00. . . .

In J. SZOSTEK, M., 93 B.R. 399 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . Matter of Central Ice Cream Co., 841 F.2d 732 (7th Cir.1988); Matter of Pine, adding an additional $327.50 . . .

ECOS, INC. v. S. BRINEGAR, T. J. D. W. F. Jr. A, 671 F. Supp. 381 (M.D.N.C. 1987)

. . . In this action, Crest Street reasonably claims $327.50 in long distance phone calls and $579.17 in out . . .

J. Jr. P. v., 88 T.C. 1192 (T.C. 1987)

. . . claimed an increased deficiency of $3,537 (for a total of $21,434), and an increased addition to tax of $327.50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROJAS,, 731 F.2d 707 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 327.50. This section was amended in 1981. . . . See notes to § 327.50. . . . Section 327.72 imposes the penalties for violations of § 327.50 but still refers to § 327.50’s old code . . .

B. GUINASSO V. v. PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a, 100 F.R.D. 264 (D. Or. 1983)

. . . FACTS Plaintiffs submitted a cost bill in the sum of $327.50 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. . . .

In HUDSON FEATHER DOWN PRODUCTS, INC. HUDSON FEATHER DOWN PRODUCTS, INC. v. B B ASSOCIATES, INC., 22 B.R. 247 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . The balance of B&B’s commissions in the amount of $327.50 due on the other sales shown on the First Invoice . . .

In GROWNEY, GROWNEY, v. GROWNEY,, 15 B.R. 849 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the unpaid medical and dental expenses were $4,251 for Maureen and $327.50 . . .

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. DODD, 416 F. Supp. 1216 (D. Md. 1976)

. . . under the ordinary liability provisions of the policy, and in October 1974 settled with Chester for $327.50 . . . The settlement of Chester’s claim for $327.50 was also made in good faith. . . . liability and PIP claims in the total amounts which it has paid into court in this case, less the $327.50 . . . The difference is $2,771.90, against which the Hartford is entitled to a credit of $327.50, representing . . . The payment into court failed to take into account the payment of $327.50 to Chester under the liability . . .

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. a v. MIZERANY WAREHOUSE, INC. a, 413 F. Supp. 911 (E.D. Mo. 1974)

. . . 1972 through March 19, 1973 in the amount of three hundred and twenty-seven dollars and fifty cents ($327.50 . . .

In SOLARI FURS, a, 263 F. Supp. 658 (E.D. Mo. 1967)

. . . disclosed two additional wholesale sales made in February, 1962, both to the same dealer, one for $327.50 . . .

GILLIS v. GILLETTE, 184 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1950)

. . . the premises”; (2) that thereafter appellees completed the concrete basement at a reasonable cost of $327.50 . . .

GILLIS v. GILLETTE, 13 Alaska 55 (9th Cir. 1950)

. . . the premises”; (2) that thereafter appellees completed the concrete basement at a reasonable cost of $327.50 . . .

YOUR ICE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 57 F. Supp. 830 (M.D. Tenn. 1944)

. . . This account consisted of the following items: Cash in bank, $642.20; petty cash, $327.50; and inventory . . . balance of the Merchandising Bank Account amounting to $1043.89 and their Petty Cash Fund amounting to 327.50 . . .

ANDRESEN v. KAERCHER, 38 F.2d 462 (8th Cir. 1930)

. . . . $192.81 $327.50 $719.05 and interest accrued. . . .

a v. Z. D., 91 Fla. 460 (Fla. 1926)

. . . Sellars, $327.50, C. F. Hinesley, $43.50, Z. D. Adair, $21.00. That the respondents C. Y. . . . Sellars, $327.50, C. F. Hinesley, $43.50, and Z. D. . . .

FAULKNER v. KAPLON, 203 F. 114 (E.D.N.C. 1913)

. . . For Merchandise past due $327.50. Loans from bank $300. Liability of Chase City Store $2,750.00.' . . .

KELLEY v. McNAMEE, 3 Alaska Fed. 176 (9th Cir. 1908)

. . . Dome Creek, an account was stated between him and the defendants, upon which statement a balance of $327.50 . . .

KELLEY v. McNAMEE, 164 F. 369 (9th Cir. 1908)

. . . Dome Creek, an account was stated between him and the defendants, upon which statement a balance of $327.50 . . .

WEISS v. HAIGHT FREESE CO., 148 F. 399 (D. Mass. 1906)

. . . Carl Weiss had paid in $5,380 and had drawn out $327.50. . . .

J. R. Co. W. M., 35 Fla. 219 (Fla. 1895)

. . . claim consisted by his bill of particulars of four separate transactions, amounting in the total to $327.50 . . .

v., 46 F. 903 (C.C.E.D. Mo. 1891)

. . . Judgment will be entered-for $327.50, with interest- only, from this date, June'22, 1891. . . .

MERRITT v. CAMERON, 137 U.S. 542 (U.S. 1890)

. . . to the collector the balance of the duties assessed on the whole cargo, to wit, $1244.21, of which $327.50 . . .