The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIV
VESSELS

Chapter 328
VESSELS: TITLE CERTIFICATES; LIENS; REGISTRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 328.37

328.37 Validity of rights, duties, and interests flowing from law prior to ch. 2019-76.—

(1) The rights, duties, and interests flowing from a transaction, certificate of title, or record relating to a vessel which was validly entered into or created before the effective date of this act and would be subject to this act if it had been entered into or created on or after the effective date of this act remain valid on and after the effective date of this act.

(2) This act does not affect an action or proceeding commenced before the effective date of this act.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (4), a security interest that is enforceable immediately before the effective date of this act and would have priority over the rights of a person who becomes a lien creditor at that time is a perfected security interest under this act.

(4) A security interest perfected immediately before the effective date of this act remains perfected until the earlier of:

(a) The time perfection would have ceased under the law under which the security interest was perfected; or

(b) Three years after the effective date of this act.

(5) This act does not affect the priority of a security interest in a vessel if immediately before the effective date of this act the security interest is enforceable and perfected, and that priority is established.

History.—s. 31, ch. 2019-76.

F.S. 328.37 on Google Scholar

F.S. 328.37 on Casetext

Amendments to 328.37

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 328.37

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 328.37.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND ERISA LITIGATION. To, 763 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Stearns’ reliance on historical financial information in the development of assumptions was justified (AU 328.37 . . .

In LORD, a k a v. R. a, 270 B.R. 787 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1998)

. . . The evidence shows that $328.37 was garnished from wages earned by Plaintiff more than ninety days prior . . . Defendants continue to hold the sum of $328.37 that was garnished from Plaintiffs wages. . . . The Court is persuaded that Plaintiff should recover the sum of $328.37 as actual damages under section . . . The evidence shows that $328.37 was withheld from wages that Plaintiff earned prior to the preference . . .

J. BRENNAN, v. B. JEFFRIES, 398 F. Supp. 471 (D. Ariz. 1973)

. . . Salomon L. 63.75 McKeever, Earl 148.38 Miller, Max Norman 340.37 Ortiz, Rosadlo 21.75 Pereira, Raymond 328.37 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROGERS,, 289 F.2d 433 (4th Cir. 1961)

. . . The teller, reading the total paid to date as the amount of the check, paid Sapp $4,-328.37. . . .

JOHN R. SAPP v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 157 Fla. 605 (Fla. 1946)

. . . one-thousand-dollar bills, ten one-hundred-dollar bills, and twenty fifty-dollar bills, which she supplemented with $328.37 . . .