Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 328.65 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 328.65 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 328.65

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIV
VESSELS
Chapter 328
VESSELS: TITLE CERTIFICATES; LIENS; REGISTRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 328.65
328.65 Legislative intent with respect to registration and numbering of vessels.It is the legislative intent that vessels be registered and numbered uniformly throughout the state. The purpose of ss. 327.58, 327.70, 327.72, 328.66, 328.68, and 328.72 is to make registration and numbering procedures similar to those of automobiles and airplanes and to provide for a vessel registration fee and certificate so as to determine the ownership of vessels which are operated, used, or stored on the waters of this state and to aid in the advancement of maritime safety.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-361; s. 8, ch. 74-327; s. 6, ch. 84-184; s. 20, ch. 99-289; s. 27, ch. 2009-86.
Note.Former s. 371.62; s. 327.21.

F.S. 328.65 on Google Scholar

F.S. 328.65 on Casetext

Amendments to 328.65


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 328.65
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 328.65.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In BOYD,, 487 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2013)

. . . attorney’s fees, $2,677.50 to meet the requirements of § 1325(a)(4), and a Trustee’s commission of $328.65 . . .

LIND v. MIDLAND FUNDING, L. L. C. P. A. N., 688 F.3d 402 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . Of the attached funds, $328.65 were from a joint checking account shared by Steve and Tracy, while the . . .

UNITED STATES v. McCOMBS- ELLISON, J. M., 826 F. Supp. 1479 (W.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . MeCombs-EIIison’s $50,000.00 Marine Midland Bank mortgage, which was then $47,-328.65. . . .

COTTIER v. UNITED STATES, 101 F. 423 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1900)

. . . The protest was as follows: “Wo herewith protest against the assessment of $328.65 duties on frames contained . . .