Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 332.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 332.07 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 332.07

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXV
AVIATION
Chapter 332
AIRPORTS AND OTHER AIR NAVIGATION FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 332.07
332.07 Appropriations.The governing bodies having power to appropriate moneys within the municipalities in this state acquiring, establishing, constructing, enlarging, improving, maintaining, equipping, or operating airports and other air navigation facilities under the provisions of ss. 332.01-332.12 are hereby authorized to appropriate and cause to be raised by taxation or otherwise in such municipalities moneys sufficient to carry out therein the provisions of ss. 332.01-332.12.
History.s. 7, ch. 22846, 1945.

F.S. 332.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 332.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 332.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 332.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 332.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PINSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 313 F. Supp. 3d 88 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . within the Bureau of Prisons since 2008, (2) all documents related to Report of Incident Tracking # BMP 332.07 . . .

PINSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 236 F. Supp. 3d 338 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . the Bureau of Prisons since 2008,” (2) all documents “related to Report of Incident Tracking # BMP 332.07 . . . This complaint centers on the' request for documents related to Report of Incident # BMP 332.07 and video . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. SMITH,, 105 F. Supp. 2d 446 (W.D. Pa. 2000)

. . . If we accept Smith’s calculations that (a) the amount of marihuana in stored in his trailer was 332.07 . . .

APEX MINING COMPANY, a v. CHICAGO COPPER CHEMICAL COMPANY, a, 340 F.2d 985 (8th Cir. 1965)

. . . appellant’s specific allegations of error, we find it argued that ■damages should not have been allowed on ■332.07 . . .

PEDRO v. ALLEN, 19 F. Cas. 93 (D. Mass. 1870)

. . . Decree for the libellant for $332.07 and costs. . . .