Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 334.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 334.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 334.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 334
TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 334.01
334.01 Florida Transportation Code; short title.Chapters 334-339, 341, 348, and 349 and ss. 332.003-332.007, 351.35, 351.36, 351.37, and 861.011 may be cited as the “Florida Transportation Code.”
History.s. 168, ch. 29965, 1955; s. 1, ch. 73-59; s. 72, ch. 79-164; s. 6, ch. 84-309.

F.S. 334.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 334.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 334.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 334.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 334.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

KLEIN, v. CREDICO INC., 922 F.3d 393 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Instead, Credico says it could seek pre-judgment interest pursuant to Minnesota Statute section 334.01 . . . Accounts Receivable Servs., LLC that the Minnesota Supreme Court has not yet decided whether section 334.01 . . . We also determined that "the text of § 334.01 does not prohibit" recovering pre-judgment interest. . . .

DANGER, v. NEXTEP FUNDING, LLC LLC,, 355 F. Supp. 3d 796 (D. Minn. 2019)

. . . . § 334.01. She asserts her CLA claim against Nextep, (Am. . . . Stat. § 334.01. . . . Stat. § 334.01." Id. at 546. . . . Stat. § 334.01 by charging an APR in excess of 120%, which exceeds the 8% limit allowed under Minnesota . . .

COYNE, v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC P. A., 895 F.3d 1035 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 334.01(1) (setting forth the rule that "[i]n the computation of interest upon any ... instrument . . . Stat. § 334.01." . . . Stat. § 334.01(1) provides that "[i]n the computation of interest upon any ... instrument or agreement . . . Stat. § 334.01 -did not state a plausible claim under §§ 1692e and 1692f. . . . Stat. § 334.01(1). . . .

HILL, v. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SERVICES, LLC,, 888 F.3d 343 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . for unpaid medical services totaling $2,997.63 and for statutory interest under Minnesota Statutes § 334.01 . . . Accounts Receivable's conciliation court complaint, however, sought interest under Minnesota Statutes § 334.01 . . . Whether § 334.01 applies to Accounts Receivable's conciliation court claim is a question of Minnesota . . . Furthermore, the text of § 334.01 does not prohibit Accounts Receivable from recovering such interest . . .

DRB LLC, a v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, a, 976 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . . § 334.01, Subd. 1, which sets interest rates at 6% unless otherwise contracted for in writing. . . .

TAFT, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 828 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . . § 334.01, subd. 2. . . . the rate or amount of interest, points, finance charges, fees, or other charges.... ” Minn.Stat. § 334.01 . . . Thus, section 334.01, subd. 2 applies and there is no limitation on the amount of interest Wells Fargo . . . Section 334.01, subd. 2, was enacted nearly 20 years after the statute on which Plaintiff relies, Minn.Stat . . . Thus, according to Minnesota's own construction-of-laws statute, the later-in-time section (§ 334.01, . . .

BEST BUY STORES, L. P. v. DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION, LP, DDR MDT LLC, DDRA LLC, DDR LLC, DDRA LP, DDR MDT LP, DDR MDT LLC, DDR MDT LLC, DDR MDT LLC, DDR II, LP, DDRC PDK LLC, DDR MDT LLC, DDR MDT LLC, JDN JDN BG III, LLC, 715 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Minn. 2010)

. . . Because the Minnesota Supreme Court has not decided whether § 334.01 or § 549.09 applies in a breach . . . MinmStat. § 334.01. . . . Minnesota courts distinguish § 334.01 from § 549.09. . . . Section 334.01 “applies to interest on ‘legal indebtedness,’ such as wages and tax refunds.” . . . The cases upon which Best Buy relies to show the Minnesota Supreme Court’s application of § 334.01 to . . .

M. MAUS, v. N. TODER, P. A., 681 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (D. Minn. 2010)

. . . . § 334.01. . . . Minn.Stat. § 334.01. . . . Minn.Stat. § 334.01. Two options present themselves. . . . Thus the question to be decided is whether Minn.Stat. § 334.01 and the accompanying remedy provisions . . . The Court finds § 334.01 and the accompanying remedy provisions in §§ 334.03 and 334.05 are penal in . . .

MUNOZ, v. PIPESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC, P. A., 513 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (D. Minn. 2007)

. . . . § 334.01 (2006). . . .

HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. v. M- I, LLC,, 244 F.R.D. 369 (E.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . two invoices include itemized charges and those two invoices included a $3.50 per page charge plus $334.01 . . .

HOPFENSPIRGER, v. WEST, 949 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Specifically, section 334.01(2), Minnesota Statutes, provides that a usury defense cannot be raised by . . .

EGGE, v. HEALTHSPAN SERVICES COMPANY d b a, 115 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (D. Minn. 2000)

. . . . §§ 1692e and 1692f, and section 334.01 of the Minnesota Statutes (“ § 334.01”). . . . Stat. § 334.01, be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failing . . . Section 334.01 of Minnesota Statutes prohibits interest rates higher than 6% unless pursuant to a contract . . . any such loan or forbearance shall have paid or delivered any greater sum or value than in section 334.01 . . . law requires that a person have “paid or delivered any greater sum or value” than allowed by section 334.01 . . .

In CONSUMERS REALTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v., 238 B.R. 418 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 334.01 (1995) (providing 6% interest on any legal indebtedness unless a different rate is contracted . . .

FOGIE, v. THORN AMERICAS, INC. THORN EMI a v. THORN A- THORN EMI A, 190 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 334.01-20 (1998). . . . Stat. § 334.01 (1998). . . .

FOGIE, v. THORN AMERICAS, INC. A- a THORN EMI a, 95 F.3d 645 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 334.01-.03; and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization statute (RICO), 18 U.S.C . . . Does the usury statute, Minn.Stat. § 334.01, apply to rent-to-own contracts? . . . Obviously, these rates far exceed the legal limit under the usury statute, Minn.Stat. § 334.01. . . . Rent-A-Center, Inc., the Court ruled in no uncertain terms that the usury statute, Minn.Stat. § 334.01 . . . Stat. § 334.01. . . . .

In DEF INVESTMENTS, INC., 186 B.R. 671 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995)

. . . . § 334.01, since the effective rate of interest collected and provided for under the contracts exceeded . . .

In J. DONNAY A. FARRELL, ESTATE OF J. DONNAY A. v. WURM, 184 B.R. 767 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995)

. . . . § 334.01. Corporations such as Peavey or Pillsbury may not assert a usury defense. . . .

STARKS v. RENT- A- CENTER WRS a A- a EMI USA a, 58 F.3d 358 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 334.01, applies only as a limitation on interest, not on rental fees. . . . consumer protection provision, Minn.Stat. § 325G.16, subd. 4, and usury in violation of Minn.Stat. § 334.01 . . .

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. v. FLIGHT TRAILS S Co. L., 3 F.3d 292 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 334.01 in determining the interest rate to use and awarded interest from the time of the breach, . . . Air Resorts claims that § 334.01 applies only to judgments before July 1,1984, since that is when the . . . We disagree with Air Resorts’ claim that § 549.01 was intended to supersede § 334.01. . . .

FOGIE v. RENT- A- CENTER, INC. a TEUSA a EMI USA a EMI a, 867 F. Supp. 1398 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . . §§ 8.31 subd. 3a, (unlawful trade practices act and consumer fraud act) 334.01 et seq. . . . injunctive relief pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 8.31 subd. 3a, 325F.69, 325D.44, 325G.16, 336.2-302, and 334.01 . . . The claims for damages asserted by plaintiffs under Minn.Stat. §§ 8.31 subd. 3a, 334.01 et seq. and 10 . . .

In C. SUNDE P. S. DIETZ, v. T. PHIPPS, 149 B.R. 552 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1992)

. . . Section 334.03 follows §§ 334.01, 334.011, and 334.012, which set different usury ceilings for different . . . loans secured by a borrower’s savings or time-deposit accounts with an institutional lender; and § 334.01 . . .

In E. KING A. FACILITY PLANNING, INC. a v. E. KING A., 68 B.R. 569 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1986)

. . . . § 334.01. The Court agrees with Defendants, the loan was usurious. . . . . § 334.01 provides in pertinent part: The interest for any legal indebtedness shall be at the rate of . . .

J. PEPIN, v. DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE,, 493 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1986)

. . . . § 334.01 et seq., Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

L. PHILLIPS, L. L. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH, INC. M., 623 F. Supp. 493 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 334.01 mandates 6% interest. . . .

BITRONICS SALES COMPANY, INC. a v. MICROSEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a, 610 F. Supp. 550 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 334.01, shall be denied. . . .

J. SCHUMANN, d b a v. F. LEVI,, 728 F.2d 1141 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 334.01, which provides that the interest rate for any legal indebtedness shall be at the rate of . . . the Minnesota Supreme Court held that prejudgment interest should be computed according to section 334.01 . . .

FEDDERS CORPORATION, v. L. TAYLOR, P. R. FEDDERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, v. T. C. DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 473 F. Supp. 961 (D. Minn. 1979)

. . . . § 334.01) from May 30, 1975 accrued through May 31, 1979 $ 27.913.37 Total Principal and Interest $144,250.37 . . .

SECURITY LIFE TRUST COMPANY, a v. JONES,, 202 So. 2d 906 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Frady of this development, and on September 30 he collected from appellee a check for $334.01, which . . . Frady advised her that $334.01 was sufficient. Moreover, appellant wrote Mr. . . .

HALDEMAN- HOMME MANUFACTURING CO. a v. TEXACON INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 236 F. Supp. 99 (D. Minn. 1964)

. . . . § 334.01 (1961) provides in part: “Contracts shall bear the same rate of interest after they become . . .

H. B. LEWIS D. M. M. G. D. M. M. G. v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA a St. a, 95 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1957)

. . . . §§ 334.01 et seq., 335.01 et seq.; 336.01 et seq., 337.01 et seq., 338.01 et seq., 339.01 et seq., . . .

WREATH, 30 F. Cas. 653 (E.D. Pa. 1872)

. . . disagreement having been argued by counsel, the court unhesitatingly allows the costs, amounting to $334.01 . . .