Home
Menu
Call outside Criminal Attorney Mark S. Barnett
904-562-8444
F.S. 335.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 335.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 335.07


The 2022 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 335
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 335.07 Florida Statutes and Case Law
335.07 Sufficiency rating system for roads on State Highway System.
(1) The department shall adopt a sufficiency rating system for roads on the State Highway System.
(2) Such system shall include, but shall not be limited to, the consideration of the following factors:
(a) Structural adequacy;
(b) Safety; and
(c) Service.
(3) The determination of rating, at a minimum, shall take into consideration the volume of traffic using the roads and the minimum engineering standards required to safely accommodate such volume of traffic; the age of the roads; the width of pavement and shoulders; the number and degree of curves, both horizontal and vertical; ridability; and maintenance economy.
History.s. 31, ch. 29965, 1955; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 39, ch. 84-309.

Statutes updated from Official Statutes on: August 29, 2022
F.S. 335.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 335.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 335.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 335.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 335.07.


Civil Citations / Citable Offenses under S335.07
R or S next to points is Mandatory Revocation or Suspension

Current data shows no reason a civil citation or a suspension or revocation of license should have been issued under Florida Statute 335.07.


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

  1. State v. Walker

    2010 Ohio 3043 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
    {¶ 17} Appellant was cited under City of Canton Ordinance 335.07. City of Canton Ordinance 335.07 is identical to R.C. 4510.11, which states in part:
    PAGE 5
  2. Jackson v. Stacey

    96 Ohio App. 3d 169 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 1 times
    The record shows the city of Jackson wanted Section 335.07 to be in conformity with R.C. 4511.192, but it did not comply with the requirements of R.C. 731.19 and, therefore, the attempt must fail. The record also shows Stacey was charged under Jackson Municipal Code 335.07, which was not properly adopted and is therefore invalid and of no force or effect.
    PAGE 174
  3. State v. Johnson

    2005 Ohio 6873 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
    {¶ 21} Chillicothe Revised Ordinance Section 335.07(a) provides: "No person whose driver's or commercial driver's license or permit or nonresident operating privilege has been suspended under any provision of the Ohio Revised Code, other than Ohio R.C. Chapter 4509, or under any applicable law in any other jurisdiction in which the person's license or permit was issued shall operate any motor vehicle upon the public roads and highways or upon any public or private property used by the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking within this Municipality during the period of suspension unless the person is granted limited driving privileges and is operating the vehicle in accordance with the terms of the limited driving privileges." Section 335.07(c)(1) provides that a violation of Section 335.07(a) is a first-degree misdemeanor.
  4. State v. Edminster

    No. 75376 (Ohio Ct. App. May. 27, 1999)
    More pertinent to the issue however, pursuant to L.M.O. 335.99, violations of L.M.O. 335.07 (a) (1) and (a) (2), the only sections relevant to our discussion, are misdemeanors of the first degree. Because Edmister was convicted of a first degree misdemeanor, she does not qualify as a first offender, and the trial court entered the judgment of expungement in error. Dayton v. Sheibenberger (1996), 115 Ohio App.3d 529, 685 N.E.2d 841.
  5. City of Toledo v. Kelley

    2003 Ohio 5269 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
    {¶ 2} On October 7, 2000, appellant was charged with driving under suspension ("case 1"), a violation of Toledo Municipal Code 335.07(A)(1) and a misdemeanor of the first degree. Appellant waived his right to a speedy trial and a trial date was scheduled for February 26, 2001. On February 26, appellant failed to appear at trial and a warrant for his arrest was issued. A new trial date was scheduled for April 18, 2001. On April 18, appellant once again failed to appear at trial.
  6. State v. Nagle

    Case No. 95 C.A. 136 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2000)
    This matter presents a timely appeal from a judgment rendered by the Youngstown Municipal Court, Mahoning County, Ohio, sentencing defendant-appellant, Richard J. Nagle, to a 180-day incarceration term, 150 days of which were suspended; a one year period of probation; and, fining him $200.00 plus costs for driving under a suspended license, in violation of Youngstown City Ordinance 335.07.
  7. City of Macedonia v. Ewing

    2007 Ohio 2194 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
    {¶ 2} On April 16, 2006, appellant was cited for driving while under suspension in violation of Macedonia Codified Ordinance Section 335.07. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and asked that the case be transferred to
  8. City of Cleveland v. Evans

    2014 Ohio 4567 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
    {¶5} On October 30, 2012, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, appellant entered a plea of no contest to driving under a suspended license in violation of B.C.O. 335.07, for which he was ordered to pay a fine. The trial court also imposed a jail sentence, but suspended all days not previously served.
    PAGE 4
  9. City of Warren v. King

    ACCELERATED CASE NOS. 98-T-0108 and 98-T-0119 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 31, 1999)   Cited 2 times
    On March 18, 1997, appellant was charged with driving under the influence, in violation of city of Warren Ordinance No. 333.01A(1), and driving under suspension, in violation of city of Warren Ordinance No. 335.07. At the initial appearance on March 19, 1997, appellant entered a plea of not guilty to both charges. The matter proceeded to a bench trial on May 12, 1998.