The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 335
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 335.07

335.07 Sufficiency rating system for roads on State Highway System.—

(1) The department shall adopt a sufficiency rating system for roads on the State Highway System.

(2) Such system shall include, but shall not be limited to, the consideration of the following factors:

(a) Structural adequacy;

(b) Safety; and

(3) The determination of rating, at a minimum, shall take into consideration the volume of traffic using the roads and the minimum engineering standards required to safely accommodate such volume of traffic; the age of the roads; the width of pavement and shoulders; the number and degree of curves, both horizontal and vertical; ridability; and maintenance economy.

History.—s. 31, ch. 29965, 1955; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 39, ch. 84-309.

F.S. 335.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 335.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 335.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 335.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 335.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In R. FALKENBERG, A. SICHERMAN, v. R. FALKENBERG,, 136 B.R. 481 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1992)

. . . The amount received by Bank One was part of the total settlement award of $23,-335.07, from which the . . .

PACIFIC MAGNESIUM, v. WESTOVER, 86 F. Supp. 644 (N.D. Cal. 1949)

. . . the aforesaid amount of Thirty-nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-five and 07/100ths Dollars ($39,-335.07 . . . Socal deducted on its 1944 return a loss of $35,-335.07 on account of the cancellation of the debt, which . . . income and excess profit tax return, for the year, plaintiff claimed a deduction in the amount of $35,-335.07 . . .

THE CONFEDERATED BANDS OF UTE INDIANS v. THE UNITED STATES, 112 Ct. Cl. 123 (Ct. Cl. 1948)

. . . Executive Orders at one time or another withdrew 1,011,-335.07 acres of the land here in question “for . . .