Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 336.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 336.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 336.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 336
COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 336.12
336.12 Closing and abandonment of roads; termination of easement; conveyance of fee.The act of any commissioners in closing or abandoning any such road, or in renouncing or disclaiming any rights in any land delineated on any recorded map as a road, shall abrogate the easement theretofore owned, held, claimed or used by or on behalf of the public and the title of fee owners shall be freed and released therefrom; and if the fee of road space has been vested in the county, same will be thereby surrendered and will vest in the abutting fee owners to the extent and in the same manner as in case of termination of an easement for road purposes.
History.s. 52, ch. 29965, 1955.

F.S. 336.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 336.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 336.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 336.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 336.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, v. COFFIELD LLC,, 18 So. 3d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 336.12, Florida Statutes (2006), provides: The act of any commissioners in closing or abandoning . . .

UNITED CAROLINA BANK, v. A. HALL,, 993 F.2d 1126 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . Under the plan as modified, therefore, the debt- or was required to make monthly payments of $336.12. . . .

UNITED CAROLINA BANK, v. A. HALL,, 993 F.2d 1126 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . Under the plan as modified, therefore, the debt- or was required to make monthly payments of $336.12. . . .

In BAKER K. R. O. R. K-, 68 B.R. 360 (Bankr. D. Or. 1986)

. . . of $4,674.26, a payment to Mary Nowack as a commission for the sale of certain horses in the sum of $336.12 . . .

EMERALD EQUITIES, INC. v. J. HUTTON, J. J. J. R. J. a, 357 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The court ruled that upon abandonment, the county had nothing left to convey, and that under Section 336.12 . . . Section 336.12 reads as follows: 336.12 Closing and abandonment of roads; termination of easement; conveyance . . . The effect of Section 336.12 is to require that upon the abandonment of a road owned by the county in . . . An examination of the origins of Section 336.12 lends some support to our conclusion. . . . Appellant argues that an interpretation of Section 336.12 which allows the original grantor of the roadway . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA, STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA, STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC., 551 F.2d 678 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 336.12. 5. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN COUNTY OF DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 537 F.2d 182 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 336.12. 5. . . .

WINTER PARK PINES DEVELOPMENT CO. a v. M. KOHLOSS a, 244 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The majority most erroneously believes that by virtue of Section 336.12, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., a . . . F.S. section 336.12, F.S.A., must be construed in a manner in which it would not violate the Constitution . . . Law abounds in the United States in conformity with the construction that I have given to Section 336.12 . . . See F.S. section 336.12, F.S.A., which provides “ * * * and if the fee of road space has been vested . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. H. COCKE, 399 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . Gross income : 3,916.49 Intangible development costs 17,829.37 Depreciation 581.61 Production taxes 336.12 . . . 1957: Item Gross Income $3,916.49 Intangible development costs -0- Depreciation -0- Production taxes 336.12 . . .

W. B. WEDNER v. ESCAMBIA CHEMICAL CORPORATION, 102 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . . §§ 336.09-336.12; Islenworth Grove Co. v. County of Orange, 79 Fla. 208, 84 So. 83; Wilton v. . . .

LUMAGHI COAL CO. v. HELVERING,, 124 F.2d 645 (8th Cir. 1942)

. . . If we assume that allocation of expenses should have been made for the profit of $336.12, which was secured . . .