F.S. 349.16 on Google Scholar

F.S. 349.16 on Casetext

Amendments to 349.16

The 2022 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
Chapter 349
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 349.16 Florida Statutes and Case Law
349.16 Transfer of refunding powers to authority.The power vested in the State Board of Administration by s. 344.26, to issue its refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding, at or prior to maturity, outstanding obligations of Florida State Improvement Commission, is, but only insofar as such power to refund is applicable to any bonds of Florida State Improvement Commission heretofore issued to finance part of the cost of Jacksonville Expressway System, hereby transferred to and vested in the authority and the authority is hereby authorized to issue its revenue bonds, for the purpose of refunding such outstanding bonds of Florida State Improvement Commission, and the State Board of Administration shall be deemed to be, and is hereby, divested of such power to refund, at or prior to maturity, said bonds of Florida State Improvement Commission heretofore issued to finance part of the cost of Jacksonville Expressway System.
History.s. 16, ch. 29996, 1955.

Statutes updated from Official Statutes on: August 29, 2022
F.S. 349.16 on Google Scholar

F.S. 349.16 on Casetext

Amendments to 349.16

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 349.16
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 349.16.

Civil Citations / Citable Offenses under S349.16
R or S next to points is Mandatory Revocation or Suspension

Current data shows no reason a civil citation or a suspension or revocation of license should have been issued under Florida Statute 349.16.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

  1. State v. Kraemer

    Case No. 97-3558 (Wis. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 1998)
    Section 349.16(2):
  2. Renda v. Polk County

    319 N.W.2d 250 (Iowa 1982)   Cited 2 times
    Chapter 349, The Code, controls the official publication of county business. Section 349.16, The Code 1977, in relevant part provides:
    PAGE 251
  3. Rice Street VFW, Post # 3877 v. City of St. Paul

    452 N.W.2d 503 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 7 times
    Subd. 4. Pull-tab and tipboard tax. (a) * * * The retail sale of pull-tabs or tipboards by the organization is exempt from taxes imposed by chapter 297A if the tax imposed by this subdivision has been paid and is exempt from all local taxes and license fees except a fee authorized under section 349.16, subdivision 4.
    PAGE 506
  4. OPINION NO. OAG 31-77

    66 Op. Att'y Gen. 110 (Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen. 1977)
    For the reasons hereinafter discussed, I am of the opinion that counties, in controlling truck traffic, are limited to the police power authority granted in sees. 349.15 and 349.16, Stats. In exercising the police power under sec. 349.15, Stats., counties are not restricted to consideration of the carrying capacity of the highway, but may take into consideration the general health, welfare and safety of the public.
    PAGE 111
  5. Enbridge Energy, Ltd. P'ship v. Town of Lima

    13-cv-187-bbc (W.D. Wis. Mar. 21, 2013)
    Under 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b), a district court is required to notify the state Attorney General in any case in which the constitutionality of a state statute is "drawn in question." In this case, plaintiff Enbridge Energy is arguing that Wis. Stat. § 349.16(1)(c) "as interpreted and applied" by defendants Town of Lima and David Kyle violates both the supremacy clause, U.S. Const. Art. VI, cl. 2, and the commerce clause, U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has applied § 2403 to challenges under both the supremacy clause, Matter of Dunn, 988 F.2d 45, 46 (7th Cir. 1993), and the commerce clause. Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp., 794 F.2d 250, 259 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, I will send a copy of this order and plaintiff's complaint to the Wisconsin Attorney General so that he may decide whether he wishes to intervene on behalf of the state.
    PAGE 2
  6. Dinger v. Commonwealth

    No. 248 C.D. 2014 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Sep. 16, 2014)
    The Fairmont, West Virginia citation charged Dinger with violating Municipal Ordinance 331.02 (leaving the scene of an accident resulting only in damage to a vehicle), and Municipal Ordinance 349.16 (no proof of insurance).
    PAGE 3
  7. Town of Delafield v. Cent. Transp. Kriewaldt

    2019 WI App. 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 1 times
    No person ... shall operate a vehicle in violation of special weight limitations imposed by state or local authorities on particular highways, highway structures or portions of highways when signs have been erected as required by [ WIS. STAT. §] 349.16(2) giving notice of such weight limitations, except when the vehicle is being operated under a permit expressly authorizing such weight limitations to be exceeded....
    PAGE 183
  8. Lindell v. City of Waconia

    71 F. Supp. 2d 955 (D. Minn. 1999)   Cited 2 times
    Defendants first argue that plaintiffs lack standing to challenge Waconia City Ordinance § 581.05, because plaintiffs are not a nonprofit organization and thus are not eligible to obtain a gambling license under Minnesota law. See Minn. Stat. § 349.16, subd. 2.
    PAGE 957
  9. Perkins v. Stockert

    343 N.E.2d 340 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 2 times
    The amended Complaint asks the court to declare unconstitutional all or certain parts of the New Community Organization Act, consisting of R. C. 349.01 through R. C. 349.16, enacted by the legislature in 1972.