The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVIII
NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION, AND USE

Chapter 377
ENERGY RESOURCES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 377.30

377.30 Limitation on amount of oil or gas taken.—

(1) Whenever the total amount of oil or gas which all the pools in the state can produce exceeds the amount reasonably required to meet the reasonable market demand for oil or gas in this state, then the division shall limit the total amount of oil or gas which may be produced in the state by fixing an allowable for the state among the pools on a reasonable basis and in such a manner as to avoid undue discrimination, and so that waste will be prevented. In allocating the allowable for the state, and in fixing allowable for pools producing oil or gas, the division shall take into account the producing conditions and other relevant facts with respect to such pools, including the separate needs for oil and gas and shall formulate rules setting forth standards or a program for the distribution of the allowable for the state, and shall distribute the allowable for the state in accordance with such standards or program, and where conditions in one pool or area are substantially similar to those in another pool or area, then the same standards or program shall be applied to such pools and areas so that as far as practicable a uniform program will be followed; provided, however, the division shall permit the production of a sufficient amount of natural gas from any pool to supply adequately the reasonable market demand for such gas for light and fuel purposes if such production can be obtained without waste; and provided, further, that if the amount allocated to a pool as its share of the allowable for the state is in excess of the amount which the pool should produce to prevent waste, then the division shall fix the allowable for the pool so that waste will be prevented.

(2) Whenever the division limits the total amount of oil or gas which may be produced in any pool in this state to an amount less than that amount which the pool could produce if no restriction were imposed, which limitation may be imposed either incidentally to, or without, a limitation of the total amount of oil or gas which may be produced in the state, the division shall prorate or distribute the allowable production among the producers in the pool on a reasonable basis so as to prevent or minimize reasonably avoidable drainage from each developed unit which is not equalized by counterdrainage, and so that each producer will have the opportunity to produce or receive his or her just and equitable share, as above set forth, subject to the reasonable requirement for the prevention of waste.

(3) After the effective date of any rule, regulation or order of the division fixing the allowable production of oil or gas, or both, for any pool, no person shall produce from any well, lease or property more than the allowable production which is applicable, nor shall such amount be produced in a different manner than that which may be authorized.

(4) This section does not apply to nonnative gas recovered from a permitted natural gas storage facility.

History.—s. 24, ch. 22819, 1945; ss. 25, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 624, ch. 95-148; s. 20, ch. 2013-205.

F.S. 377.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 377.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 377.30

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 377.30

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 377.30.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WHEELER, v. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a J., 894 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 377.30 provides that a survival action can be maintained by the decedent's "personal representative . . .

PRESCOTT, a v. RADY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL- SAN DIEGO,, 265 F. Supp. 3d 1090 (S.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 377.30. . . . Proc: § 377.30. Accordingly, Ms. . . .

H. WARREN, A. v. UNITED STATES, 244 F. Supp. 3d 1173 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . . §§ 377.20, 377.21, 377.30 ét seq.; and California’s negligence statute, Cal. Civ. . . .

COHEN, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,, 238 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . § 377.30. Therefore, Mr. . . .

ESTATE OF MCNEIL, v. FREESTYLEMX. COM, INC. a LLC, a a, 177 F. Supp. 3d 1260 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . . § 377.30. . . .

ROSE, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO s, 163 F. Supp. 3d 787 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . requirements for standing to bring a survival action are stated under California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.30 . . . Code §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . .

BRESAZ, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, 136 F. Supp. 3d 1125 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . California Civil Code § 52.1 for violation of the Bane Act;, under California Code of Civil-Procedure § 377.30 . . . All Plaintiffs assert a claim under California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.30 for wrongful death. . . .

MORRISON, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED,, 139 F. Supp. 3d 1182 (D. Nev. 2015)

. . . Code § 377.30. . . .

ESTATE OF CORNEJO, SOLIS v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 618 F. App'x 917 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.30. . . . Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.30. . . .

FRARY, v. COUNTY OF MARIN,, 81 F. Supp. 3d 811 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Section 377.30 governs the surviving cause of action: A cause of action that survives the death of the . . . Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.30. . . .

COTTA, a a v. COUNTY OF KINGS, 79 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 377.30 (“§ 377.30”). Defendants maintain that Mrs. . . . Section 377.30 addresses who may pursue a survival action for a decedent: A cause of action that survives . . . See Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1093 n. 2; § 377.30. 3. Madison. . . . Specifically, “[s]urvival causes of action are. governed by section 377.30,” not § 377.60. . . . only a Decedent’s personal representative or successor in interest may assert a survival claim under § 377.30 . . .

HAYES, a v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DBA s, 736 F.3d 1223 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . requirements for standing to bring a survival action are stated under California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.30 . . . (citing Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . . Indeed, Appellant argues only that standing is appropriate under section 377.60, not section 377.30. . . .

GEORGE, v. MORRIS v., 736 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . .; Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . . . .

GEORGE, v. MORRIS v., 724 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . .; Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. .Like the dissent, in the context of the district court’s preceding . . .

BARNES v. CITY OF PASADENA, 508 F. App'x 663 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . City & Cnty. of S.F., 441 F.3d 1090, 1093 n. 2 (9th Cir.2006); Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . . .

LIN ZHANG, v. AIR CHINA LIMITED,, 866 F. Supp. 2d 1162 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . § 377.30. . . . .

M. COTTON, a McCLURE, Sr. v. CITY OF EUREKA, CALIFORNIA, a a, 860 F. Supp. 2d 999 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . §§ 377.30, 377.34. . . . Pro.Code §§ 377.20, 377.30. . . .

HAYES, a v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DBA s, 638 F.3d 688 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . requirements for standing to bring a survival action are stated under California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.30 . . . PROC. §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . . Indeed, Appellant argues only that standing is appropriate under § 377.60, not § 377.30. . . .

P. CONTRERAS, CONTRERAS v. COUNTY OF GLENN Lt. Lt. Lt. Of E. J. A. L. A. a, 725 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . to conform the claims with the applicable law in the California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.11, § 377.30 . . .

P. CONTRERAS, v. COUNTY OF GLENN Lt. Lt. Lt. E. J. A. L. A. a, 725 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . to conform the claims with the applicable law in the California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.11, § 377.30 . . .

v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH,, 623 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 377.30 (“A cause of action that survives the death of the person entitled to commence an action or . . .

AGUIRRE, a v. CITY OF WEST COVINA, 187 F. App'x 755 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . See Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.30. . . .

TATUM, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 441 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . P.Code § 377.30. . . . P.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . We review a district court's order granting summary judgment de novo. . . .

S. ILETO, S. a B. a a a a v. GLOCK INC. a a a a L. a RSR RSR a a GMBH,, 349 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . Prob.Code sections 377.30 & 377.60. . . .

WELCH, v. YOELL, 73 F. App'x 215 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 377.30; 377.11 (a successor in interest is the “beneficiary of the decedent’s estate or other successor . . .

J. VENERABLE, Mi Sr. III, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO,, 185 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (E.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . P.Code § 377.30 (survival action may be commenced by decedent’s successor in interest). . . .

In SCIGO, Jr. SCIGO, v. SCIGO, Jr., 208 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1997)

. . . The debt- or was ordered to pay $377.30 per month child support, and at the time of trial the debtor . . . Monthly Earnings Gross Income : $3,450.00 Net Income : $2,329.47 Debtor’s Monthly Expenses Child Support 377.30 . . . plaintiff's net monthly earnings of $2,557.30 and the amount of child support she receives monthly of $377.30 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CENTRA, INC., 59 F.3d 30 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . $163.10 $143,555.30 Yeaman, Roger $136,225.80 $69,326.40 -0-$205,552.20 Anaia, David $207.20 $170.10--0-$377.30 . . .

B. v., 103 T.C. 700 (T.C. 1994)

. . . . ^ ‡ ‡ Sec. 377.30. . . . Code secs. 377.10, 377.11, 377.30, 377.33 (West Supp. 1994).] Cal. Civ. Proc. . . .

FULTON FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF ATLANTA, v. AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 143 F.R.D. 292 (N.D. Ga. 1991)

. . . Germano ($377.30); Gerald Bachelor ($68.60); Lawrence E. Joyner ($308.70); and William B. . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 436.25 2004 1,798.22 423.03 2005 1,934.01 410.59 2006 2,080.04 398.86 2007 2.237.11 387.78 2008 2,406.03 377.30 . . .

MID- HUDSON LEGAL SERVICES, v. G U, INC., 465 F. Supp. 261 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . I am also asked to award costs in the Court of Appeals, totalling $377.30, but respectfully leave to . . .

WILLIAM W. PECHETTE v. THE UNITED STATES, 145 Ct. Cl. 189 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . of the 739 hours computed at the salary plaintiff was receiving on the date of his separation, less $377.30 . . . of $1,509.22, being $1,886.52, the gross value of the 739 hours of accumulated annual leave, less $377.30 . . . Form 843, for refund of $377.30, the amount of tax that was withheld, on April 26, 1953, from the payment . . .

P. H. McLAUGHLIN CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 37 Ct. Cl. 150 (Ct. Cl. 1902)

. . . expenses of the architect from September 8 to December 31, 1891, and for the years of 1892 and 1893, $377.30 . . .