The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Khao Vang is denied without prejudice because Plaintiffs failed to comply with the requirements of § 377.32 . . .
. . . proceedings as de Fontbrune’s successors in interest pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code § 377.32 . . .
. . . in a representative capacity, pursuant to Rule 25 and California Code of Civil Procedure 377.11 and 377.32 . . .
. . . execute and file an affidavit or declaration stating compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.32 . . . Code §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . . Code § 377.32; Hayes v. Cty. of San Diego, 736 F.3d 1223, 1229 (9th Cir.2013). . . .
. . . . § 377.32 (“The person who seeks to commence an action or proceeding ... as the decedent’s successor . . . Sept. 25, 2006) (“California law does not require that an heir file an affidavit under § 377.32 ... as . . . May 9, 2012) (“Section 377.32 does not indicate that it is a condition precedent to filing the lawsuit . . . has the capacity to proceed on behalf of Carmignani’s Estate in accordance with Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.32 . . .
. . . . §§ 377.20, 377.32 (“§ 377.32”)). . . . Among other things, § 377.32(c) provides that “[a] certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate . . . Cotta has provided the supporting declaration under [§ 377.32], with the exception of a copy of the death . . . Cotta from filing a certified copy of Decedent’s death ■ certificate pursuant to § 377.32 was clearly . . . Cotta is time-barred from filing a corrected or amended § 377.32 affidavit. . . .
. . . . § 377.32. . . .
. . . (citing Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . . California law to commence a survival action as a decedent’s successor in interest, see Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.32 . . .
. . . .; Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . . . .
. . . .; Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. .Like the dissent, in the context of the district court’s preceding . . .
. . . City & Cnty. of S.F., 441 F.3d 1090, 1093 n. 2 (9th Cir.2006); Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . . .
. . . that Plaintiffs have not fulfilled the procedural requirements of California Civil Procedure Code § 377.32 . . . Atkinson’s parents, have fulfilled the procedural requirements of California Civil Procedure Code § 377.32 . . . California Civil Procedure Code § 377.32 provides: (a) The person who seeks to commence an action or . . .
. . . . §§ 377.30, 377.32). . . . PROC. § 377.32, or whether survival claims may now be time barred if Appellant has failed to do so. . . .
. . . complaint, plaintiffs had not yet filed the affidavit required by California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.32 . . . , plaintiffs Jerry Lum and Dorothea Timmons filed a declaration with the court that complies with § 377.32 . . .
. . . . § 377.32(5) and (6), the Court is not convinced [appellants] are proper parties for substitution. . . . Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.32. . . . Proc.Code § 377.32 is readily apparent under an Ene analysis. . . . Proc.Code § 377.32 is a state procedural rule. . . . The district court abused its discretion in relying upon Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 377.32, a state procedural . . .
. . . the terms of the stipulation, the Debtor agreed to pay NBT $25,000.00 in 84 monthly installments of $377.32 . . .
. . . . § 377.32, requiring the plaintiff to, among other things, file an affidavit or declaration indicating . . .
. . . P.Code §§ 377.30, 377.32. . We review a district court's order granting summary judgment de novo. . . .
. . . Code section 377.32 (West Supp. 1994) sets forth the requirements for a statement from a successor in . . .
. . . libellant was paid a net sum of $1,197.72, such sum being composed of $1,305 wages, $992.28 bonus, $377.32 . . .
. . . 322, 407. 54 Unexpired insurance_ 2, 862. 66 Overdrawn account of James Shand_ 6,077. 03 Total_ 470, 377.32 . . .