Cases from cite.case.law:

LOMBARDO, v. WARNER,, 353 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 377.35(2). . . .

R. COHEN, v. CARRAO, J. Co., 101 F.R.D. 731 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . (“Cohen”), obtained a $195,-377.35 judgment against Jack Carrao (“Carrao”). . . .

MURPHY OIL CO. v. BURNET, r COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MURPHY OIL CO., 55 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1932)

. . . therefrom at 38.141 cents per barrel up to December 1, 1913, the date of the lease; that is, less $163,-377.35 . . .

GIRARD TRUST CO. v. RUSSELL, 179 F. 446 (3d Cir. 1910)

. . . McCay has deposited with the said company the sum of $377.35 for the purpose of having the same, together . . . agreement holding that there was a gift to charity contemporaneously with the deposit of the first sum of $377.35 . . . The deposit of the $377.35 with the trust company and the gift to charity were not intended to be contemporaneous . . . that the able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant to the effect that the deposit of $377.35 . . .

RUSSELL v. GIRARD TRUST CO., 171 F. 161 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1909)

. . . Under this agreement McCay paid to the defendant the $377.35 mentioned therein, and afterwards other . . .

SOWLES v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF PLATTSBURG, 130 F. 1009 (C.C.D. Vt. 1904)

. . . plaintiff was a surety for $2,564.13, and for a note not due, on which the plaintiff was a surety for $377.35 . . . The note of $377.35, not due, was not noticed when the arrangement was made, and when it became due it . . . collecting so much of these notes as that one-half would pay; that the attempt to enforce the note of $377.35 . . .