Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 406.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 406.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 406.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 406
MEDICAL EXAMINERS; DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 406.12
406.12 Duty to report; prohibited acts.It is the duty of any person in the district where a death occurs, including all municipalities and unincorporated and federal areas, who becomes aware of the death of any person occurring under the circumstances described in s. 406.11 to report such death and circumstances forthwith to the district medical examiner. Any person who knowingly fails or refuses to report such death and circumstances, who refuses to make available prior medical or other information pertinent to the death investigation, or who, without an order from the office of the district medical examiner, willfully touches, removes, or disturbs the body, clothing, or any article upon or near the body, with the intent to alter the evidence or circumstances surrounding the death, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.s. 7, ch. 70-232; s. 353, ch. 71-136.

F.S. 406.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 406.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 406.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 406.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S406.12 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO REPORT DEATH TO MEDICAL EXAMINER - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ROSARIO, v. STATE, 175 So. 3d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Id. at § 406.12. Failure to do so is a first degree misdemeanor. Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. IGNASIAK, Jr., 667 F.3d 1217 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at § 406.12. Failure to do so is a first degree misdemeanor. Id. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Claim 406.9 Burden of Proof on Claim 406.10 Defense Issues 406.11 Burden of Proof on Defense Issues 406.12 . . .

In A SULLIVAN, Sr. M, 370 B.R. 314 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2007)

. . . foregoing amount from Debtors’ currently monthly income of $9,502.00, leaves Debtors with roughly $406.12 . . .

PETITION OF RJF INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, CIVIL AND MARITIME, 332 F. Supp. 2d 458 (D.R.I. 2004)

. . . . § 406.12(a). . . .

In E. TALBOT, M. E. M. v., 254 B.R. 63 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2000)

. . . found the fair market value of the property to be $158,000, the outstanding indebtedness to be $137,-406.12 . . .

S. FREUND, v. A. BUTTERWORTH,, 117 F.3d 1543 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . Stat. ch. 406.12 (1983) (making it a first-degree misdemeanor to "without an order from the office of . . .

BENSON V. FABIANO, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF UNITED STATES,, 948 F. Supp. 213 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . . § 406.12(a). . . . that individual is “entitled or deemed entitled to Social Security disability benefits.” 42 C.F.R. 406.12 . . . entitled to hospital insurance benefits is he or she (1) would meet the requirements of- § 406.10, § 406.12 . . . before the month of application may be counted towards the 25 month qualifying period specified in § 406.12 . . .

CORN REFINERS ASSOCIATION, INC. CPC v. M. COSTLE,, 594 F.2d 1223 (8th Cir. 1979)

. . . . §§ 406.12 and 406.13.” . . .

GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION v. E. TRAIN,, 407 F. Supp. 96 (S.D. Iowa 1976)

. . . Section 406.12 of the guidelines sets forth the effluent limitation guidelines for existing point sources . . . Section 406.12 then sets forth, in tabular form, the 1977 limitations which are to govern each point . . .

CPC INTERNATIONAL INC. v. E. TRAIN PENICK FORD, LTD. v. E. TRAIN,, 515 F.2d 1032 (8th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 406.12. ' The 1983 guidelines/new source standards are predicated on the availability of the 1977 . . . however, that the final regulations were entitled “effluent limitations guidelines,” see 40 C.F.R. §§ 406.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. HUGHES d b a, 340 F. Supp. 539 (N.D. Miss. 1972)

. . . interest on the dates and in the net amounts as follows: Date of Purchase Net Amount November 12, 1969 $ 406.12 . . .

MYERS v. HURLEY MOTOR CO., 18 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1927)

. . . Payments were made on the contract to the amount of $156.12, making a total payment on the contract of $406.12 . . . plaintiff attained the age of 21 years and promptly disaffirmed his contract, demanding a return of the $406.12 . . .

MYERS v. HURLEY MOTOR COMPANY, 273 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1927)

. . . made payments on the contract to the amount of- $156.12, making a total payment on the contract of $406.12 . . . 1923, and, on the 1st day of November following, disaffirmed his contract and demanded the return of $406.12 . . . present suit was brought in the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia by plaintiff to recover $406.12 . . .