Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 487.025 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 487.025 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 487.025

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 487
PESTICIDE REGULATION AND SAFETY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 487.025
487.025 Misbranding.
(1) A pesticide or device is misbranded if its labeling bears any statement, design, or graphic representation which is false or misleading in any particular.
(2) A pesticide is misbranded if:
(a) It is an imitation of, or is offered for sale under the name of, another pesticide.
(b) Its labeling bears any reference to registration under this part.
(c) The labeling accompanying it does not contain instructions for use which are necessary and, if complied with, adequate for the protection of the public.
(d) The label does not contain a warning or caution statement which may be necessary and, if complied with, adequate to prevent injury to living humans and other vertebrate animals.
(e) The label does not bear an ingredient statement on that part of the immediate container, and on the outside container or wrapper, if there is one, through which the ingredient statement on the immediate container cannot be clearly read, of the retail package which is presented or displayed under customary conditions of purchase.
(f) Any word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this part to appear on the labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness, as compared with other words, statements, designs, or graphic matter in the labeling, and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.
(g) It is injurious to living humans or other vertebrate animals or vegetation, except weeds, to which it is applied, or to the person applying such pesticide as directed or in accordance with commonly recognized practice.
(h) In the case of a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant, when used as directed, it is injurious to living humans or other vertebrate animals, or vegetation, to which it is applied, or to the person applying such pesticide. However, physical or physiological effects on plants or parts thereof shall not be deemed to be injury when this is the purpose for which the plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant was applied in accordance with the label claims and recommendations.
(i) Any ingredient which is present in amounts which are not likely to be effective when used according to directions is given undue prominence or conspicuousness, as compared with ingredients which are present in effective amounts, in its labeling. Such ingredient shall appear only in the ingredient statement.
(j) It is found to be ineffective when tested in the laboratory.
(k) It is found by the department to be of short measure.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-457; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 73-63; s. 1, ch. 79-210; s. 1, ch. 82-106; s. 1, ch. 82-167; s. 15, ch. 84-338; ss. 3, 37, ch. 92-115; s. 5, ch. 94-233; s. 475, ch. 97-103; s. 11, ch. 2000-154; s. 24, ch. 2004-64.
Note.Former s. 487.021(37).

F.S. 487.025 on Google Scholar

F.S. 487.025 on Casetext

Amendments to 487.025


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 487.025
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 487.025.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In YAU, N., 115 B.R. 245 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . CCP section 487.025, which discusses the effect of a declared homestead on attachment liens, has language . . . CCP section 487.025, however, differs in two important respects. . . . But this result would undermine the statement in CCP section 487.025 that a homestead declaration has . . . Although the case only involved an attachment lien, the court in Figy did not mention CCP section 487.025 . . .