Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 501.202 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 501.202 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 501.202

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 501.202
501.202 Purposes; rules of construction.The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally to promote the following policies:
(1) To simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing consumer protection, unfair methods of competition, and unconscionable, deceptive, and unfair trade practices.
(2) To protect the consuming public and legitimate business enterprises from those who engage in unfair methods of competition, or unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.
(3) To make state consumer protection and enforcement consistent with established policies of federal law relating to consumer protection.
History.s. 1, ch. 73-124; s. 1, ch. 93-38.

F.S. 501.202 on Google Scholar

F.S. 501.202 on Casetext

Amendments to 501.202


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 501.202
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 501.202.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

STEWART AGENCY, INC. d b a v. ARRIGO ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a Ft. LLC, d b a Ft., 266 So. 3d 207 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. . . . unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce." § 501.202 . . .

COX, v. PORSCHE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 342 F. Supp. 3d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 501.202. . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH AND WELLNESS SERVICES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1137 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 501.202. . . .

R. CABRERA, v. HAIMS MOTORS, INC., 288 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202 ; see also Alhassid v. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PERFORMANCE ORTHOPAEDICS NEUROSURGERY, LLC,, 278 F. Supp. 3d 1307 (S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202(2)). . . .

OUTREACH HOUSING, LLC, L. v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,, 221 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 501.202, Florida Statutes (2008), states that FDUTPA “shall be construed liberally to promote . . . enforcement consistent with established policies of federal law relating to consumer protection. § 501.202 . . .

CLUCK- U CHICKEN, INC. v. CLUCK- U CORP., 358 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . .

BANNER, v. LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. STERN, P. A. J., 198 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . This application of the statute is consistent with the purposes of FDUTPA set forth in section 501.202 . . .

DEERE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, v. CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, 198 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 501.202(2)). . . .

MAKAEFF, v. TRUMP UNIVERSITY, LLC, a DONALD J. TRUMP, DOES, 145 F. Supp. 3d 962 (S.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 501.202 (FDUTPA purpose). . . .

LOMBARDO, v. JOHNSON JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., 124 F. Supp. 3d 1283 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 501.202(2). Courts must liberally construe FDUPTA. See, e.g., Samuels v. . . .

MARTORELLA, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,, 161 F. Supp. 3d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 501.202 and (2). . . . Stat. § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202 (“The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally to promote the following policies . . . See § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Sarkis v. . . .

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO, v. AIR CAPITAL GROUP, LLC ABAD,, 614 F. App'x 460 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Id. § 501.202. . . .

LEON, v. TAPAS TINTOS, INC. D., 51 F. Supp. 3d 1290 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 501.202(2); see also 501.202(3) (further defining. purpose as “mak[ing] state consumer protection . . .

SANCHEZ- KNUTSON, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 52 F. Supp. 3d 1223 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. DIAMOND,, 140 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 501.202(3), Fla. Stat. . . . Following the clear and unambiguous directive of sections 501.203(3)(b), 501.204(2), and 501.202(3), . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PHYSICIANS GROUP OF SARASOTA, L. L. C. L. L. C. a DB W. S. a W. S., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202, and courts, therefore, apply a “broad reading” of the practices that run afoul of the . . .

J. DEGUTIS, v. FINANCIAL FREEDOM, LLC LLC,, 978 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202(2). . . .

ACETO CORPORATION, a v. THERAPEUTICSMD, INC. a a, 953 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . . Stat. § 501.202(2) (emphasis added). . . .

BAKER, v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL, INC., 115 So. 3d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

In POOL PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION MARKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 946 F. Supp. 2d 554 (E.D. La. 2013)

. . . . § 501.202. . . .

DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. HOROWITCH,, 107 So. 3d 362 (Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.202; see also § 501.203(7), Fla. . . . See id. § 501.202. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC., 890 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . See § 501.202, Fla. Stat. . . .

WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC. v. TIMESHARES DIRECT, INC., 123 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2010); see KC Leisure, Inc. v. . . . See §§ 501.202(2), 501.204(1), Fla. Stat. (2010); Martinez v. . . .

SUNTREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a v. ECOSENSE INTERNATIONAL, INC. a a, 693 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 501.202(2)). . . .

In PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., 880 F. Supp. 2d 801 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

TAUBERT, v. STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 79 So. 3d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202(3), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. STERN, P. A. v. STATE, 83 So. 3d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

In HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION., 834 F. Supp. 2d 566 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . . Stat. § 501.202(2) (emphasis added). . . .

LIBERTY AMMUNITION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 101 Fed. Cl. 581 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202, the application of which is specifically to be guided by "interpretations of the Federal . . .

SOVEREIGN MILITARY HOSPITALLER ORDER OF SAINT JOHN OF JERUSALEM OF RHODES AND OF MALTA, v. FLORIDA PRIORY OF KNIGHTS HOSPITALLERS OF SOVEREIGN ORDER OF ST. JOHN OF JERUSALEM, KNIGHTS OF MALTA, ECUMENICAL ORDER,, 816 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

CAREERFAIRS. COM, a v. UNITED BUSINESS MEDIA LLC, a LLC, a O, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (2006). . . .

In FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 815 F. Supp. 2d 867 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202 (explaining that the purpose of Florida’s UDTP statute is “[t]o protect the consuming public . . . does direct that the statute be “construed liberally ... to protect the consuming public.... ” Id. § 501.202 . . .

DOLL, On Of v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 814 F. Supp. 2d 526 (D. Md. 2011)

. . . Ann. 501.202(2). . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a AT T LLC,, 648 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. SHAPIRO FISHMAN, LLP,, 59 So. 3d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

In FLORIDA CEMENT AND CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION In, 746 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

KENNETH F. HACKETT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GE CAPITAL INFORMATION TECH. d b a, 744 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL HEALTH WELFARE PLAN, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC,, 737 F. Supp. 2d 380 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

DORESTIN K. v. HOLLYWOOD IMPORTS, INC. a d b a, 45 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . prohibiting, inter alia, “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” §§ 501.202 . . .

INTERCOASTAL REALTY, INC. v. TRACY,, 706 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . . Id. § 501.202. . . . Stat. § 501.202(2) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . .

In MAXXIM MEDICAL GROUP, INC. v., 434 B.R. 660 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202. . Id. . Maxxim has conceded this point. . . .

In FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION., 692 F. Supp. 2d 524 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . Section 501.202 of the Act provides that the provisions in the Act “shall be construed liberally to promote . . .

KELLY, v. PALMER, REIFLER, ASSOCIATES, P. A., 681 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202 (providing for a liberal construction of the provisions of FDUTPA in order to protect the . . . Stat. § 501.202(2) (the Florida Legislature expressed its intent that the provisions of FDUTPA be “construed . . . Stat. § 501.202(2). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . . “unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” § 501.202 . . .

FITZPATRICK, On v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., 263 F.R.D. 687 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.202; see also Samuels v. . . . Stat. § 501.202, will not be advanced without certification. . . .

In EDGEWATER BY THE BAY, LLLP, LLLP, v., 419 B.R. 511 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.202. . . .

In MILLER, M. E. v., 418 B.R. 406 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.202(1),(2) (emphasis added). . . .

GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION, a v. J. SCOTT, s a DSI a ITI a, 652 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.202(2). See also Natural Answers, Inc. v. . . .

KERTESZ, v. NET TRANSACTIONS, LTD. a d b a AVV, TB AVV, AVV, a, 635 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (emphasis added). . . .

ALVI ARMANI MEDICAL, INC. Dr. v. HENNESSEY, 629 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

MORRIS, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES,, 580 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (“The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally to promote the following policies . . .

M. COHEN, D. M. D. M. S. St. P. C. v. IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC. d b a, 259 F.R.D. 617 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

NATURAL ANSWERS, INC. a A. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, a f. k. a. d. b. a., 529 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (2006). . . .

KC LEISURE, INC. v. HABER,, 972 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); see also Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. . . .

BEALE, v. BIOMET, INC., 492 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . .” § 501.202(2). Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So.2d 860, 869 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2006). . . .

SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. a v. Y. GALURA, 961 So. 2d 961 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 501.202(2). . . .

ARMY AVIATION HERITAGE FOUNDATION AND MUSEUM, INC. A v. BUIS, d b a d b a, 504 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (N.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 501.202. . . .

ROLLINS, INC. v. BUTLAND, 951 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 501.202(2). See also Delgado v. J.W. . . .

BAVARO PALACE, S. A. a S. A. a v. VACATION TOURS, INC. a. k. a. a, 203 F. App'x 252 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (West 2006). . . .

ROLLINS, INC. v. BUTLAND, 932 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 501.202(2). See also Delgado v. J.W. . . .

DeMAYO, v. CHAMES P. A., 934 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., § 501.202(2), Fla. . . .

AIRFLO A C HEATING, INC. v. PAGAN,, 929 So. 2d 739 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

WILLIAMS, v. J. EDELMAN P. A. a a P. A. a, 408 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 501.202(2) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 501.202. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. d b a a v., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . §§ 501.202(2), 501.204(1) (2005). . . .

COLLINS, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,, 894 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); see Marshall v. W & L Enters. . . .

BEACON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. W. v. PNR, INC. a d b a, 890 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 501.202, Fla. Stat. (1973). . . .

RUBIN, a v. MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a, 342 F. Supp. 2d 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . . § 501.202; Samuels v. . . .

TUCKISH v. POMPANO MOTOR COMPANY, a, 337 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 501.202(2). . . .

HUTSON v. REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., 837 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 501.202(303); 559.55(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

SCHAUER, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORP. d b a Ed, 819 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

BEACON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. W. v. PNR, INC. a d b a, 785 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 501.202(2) (“The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally to ... protect the consuming . . . unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.’’). .See § 501.202 . . .

S. SAMUELS R. v. KING MOTOR COMPANY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,, 782 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 501.202, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

T. DAVIS, R. v. POWERTEL, INC., 776 So. 2d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 501.202(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Sarkis v. . . .

SHIBATA, M. D. v. LIM, a, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 501.202. . . . fails to state a cause of action under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“DUT-PA”) § 501.202 . . .

MILLENNIUM COMMUNICATIONS FULFILLMENT, INC. v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 761 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 501.202, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Macias v. . . . there are no geographical or residential restrictions contained in the express language of section 501.202 . . .

LATMAN, v. COSTA CRUISE LINES, N. V., 758 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . FDUTPA is a consumer protection statute, see § 501.202(2), Fla. . . .

POWERTEL, INC. v. C. BEXLEY,, 743 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 501.202(2), Fla.Stat. (1997). . . .

COASTAL PHYSICIAN SERVICES OF BROWARD COUNTY, INC. v. ORTIZ,, 764 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See, e.g., § 501.202(3); § 559.55(6). . . .

MACIAS, v. HBC OF FLORIDA, INC., 694 So. 2d 88 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . .” § 501.202(2). . . .

W. SARKIS W. v. PAFFORD OIL COMPANY, INC. a a, 697 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 501.202, Fla.Stat. (1995). Delgado. . . .

L. DELGADO L. v. J. W. COURTESY PONTIAC GMC- TRUCK, INC., 693 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . In doing so, it expressly mandated in section 501.202 that this new legislation was to “be construed . . . Ch. 93-38, § 1, at 207 (amending § 501.202); § 2, at 207-209 (amending § 501.203); § 3, at 209 (amending . . .

W. S. BADCOCK CORPORATION, a v. A. MYERS a, 696 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 501.202, Fla.Stat. . . .

MACK, v. BRISTOL- MYERS SQUIBB CO. Co., 673 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce,” section 501.202 . . . construction, provides that the act “shall be construed liberally to promote [such] policies.... ” § 501.202 . . . authorize damage actions by consumers for antitrust violations under Florida law, we read subsections 501.202 . . . or unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. § 501.202 . . .

In CROWN AUTO DEALERSHIPS, INC., 187 B.R. 1009 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Section 501.202(2), Fla.Stat. . . .

CUMMINGS, v. WARREN HENRY MOTORS, INC. a, 648 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See section 501.202. . . .

NATIONAL ALCOHOLISM PROGRAMS COOPER CITY, FLORIDA, INC. a d b a v. PALM SPRINGS HOSPITAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN a, 825 F. Supp. 299 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . §§ 501.202(2), 501.204. . . . Fla.Stat. § 501.202. . . .

LOU BACHRODT CHEVROLET, INC. a v. K. SAVAGE,, 570 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Franklin, 400 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, § 501.202 . . .

M. G. B. HOMES, INC. v. AMERON HOMES, INC., 903 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . See §§ 501.202 and 501.203(1). Darrell Swanson Consolidated Services v. . . .

WARREN, v. MONAHAN BEACHES JEWELRY CENTER, INC., 548 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . W & L Enterprises Corp., 360 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); § 501.202(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

CIROCCO v. TRANSFLORIDA BANK, 36 Fla. Supp. 2d 110 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Section 501.202 states the purpose of the Act in part is “To protect consumers from suppliers who commit . . .

KINGSWHARF, LTD. v. KRANZ,, 545 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 501.202(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

JONES v ORLANDO SECOND CAR CENTER, INC., 30 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Compare §§ 501.202 and 501.211(2) with § 501.2075, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

ROPER, v. METROPOLITAN MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 91 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Section 501.202, Florida Statutes states in full: The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally . . .

BERT SMITH OLDSMOBILE, INC. v. B. FRANKLIN,, 400 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 501.202, id. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, v. ROGERS, d b a, 329 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1976)

. . . Section 501.202, Florida Statutes. . . . F.S. 501.202. . . .