Cases from cite.case.law:

STANKOS a v. AMATEUR ATHLETIC UNION OF THE UNITED STATES, INC., 255 So. 3d 377 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 501.212(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

BREXENDORF, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., 319 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 501.212(4)(c). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH AND WELLNESS SERVICES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1137 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . Health & Wellness argues that, under Florida Statutes section 501.212(4)(a), State Farm, as an insurer . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) ), courts within the Eleventh Circuit have repeatedly rejected this argument in . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) does not apply." State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. . . .

DOUSE, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,, 314 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 501.204(1), 501.212(3). . . .

IN RE SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 288 F. Supp. 3d 1087 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . . § 501.212(1). 4. Illinois Law. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1) Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A, § 3 ; Mich. Comp. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1). The Supreme Court of Florida has not interpreted the Safe Harbor's bounds. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1). . . .

ASOKAN, P. A. C. M. D. P. A. M. D. P. C. S. M. D. P. A. P. A. v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 302 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 501.212(4)(d). . . . Because there is no dispute that American General is an insurance company as that term is defined under § 501.212 . . .

SANCHEZ, v. AN LUXURY IMPORTS OF PEMBROKE PINES, INC. d b a, 216 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 501.212(4)(d), Fla. . . . jointly and severally liable for any section 501.2105 attorney’s fees awarded against ANL because section 501.212 . . .

PHELPS, v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION,, 244 F. Supp. 3d 1312 (S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 501.212(1). .When FSIS reviews and approves, product labels for commercial use, they are specifically . . .

GUSTAFSSON D. v. AID AUTO BROKERS, INC. a a a, 212 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 501.212(4)(d), Fla. . . .

DUKE, v. FLYING J, INC. v. LLC,, 178 F. Supp. 3d 918 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . . § 501.212; Prohias v. . . .

In ANHEUSER- BUSCH BEER LABELING MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, 644 F. App'x 515 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . Stat. 501.212(1); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1345.12(A); Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. L.A. Cellular Tel. . . .

MORGAN, v. PUBLIC STORAGE, a, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1237 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . § 501.212. . . .

MARTORELLA, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,, 161 F. Supp. 3d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Exemption to FDUTPA Claims Defendants argue that the statutory exemption set out in Florida Statute Section 501.212 . . . Addressing the same argument, the Eleventh Circuit has stated: The express language of Fla Stat. § 501.212 . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) does not apply. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. . . .

BOWE, v. PUBLIC STORAGE,, 106 F. Supp. 3d 1252 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 501.212. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MEDICAL SERVICE CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC., 103 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . intent of the legislature, id. at 9-11; (3) the statutory exemption set out in Florida Statutes Section 501.212 . . . Defendants argue that the statutory exemption set out in Florida Statute Section 501.212(4)(a) precludes . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) creates a specific exemption from suit under FDUTPA for “[a]ny person or activity . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) does not apply. . . . interpretation and the intent of the legislature, id. at 9-11; (3) the statutory exemption set out in section 501.212 . . .

NJN SYSTEMS, INC. v. SUNOCO, INC., 95 F. Supp. 3d 1330 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . See § 501.212(1) Fla. Stat. . . .

WILSON, A. v. EYERBANK, N. A., 77 F. Supp. 3d 1202 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 501.212(4)(c); Sovereign Bonds Exch. LLC v. Fed. . . .

MONTERO, W. P. M. a v. DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 153 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 501.212(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . does not apply to an “act or practice required or specifically permitted by federal or state law” § 501.212 . . .

MARTY, v. ANHEUSER- BUSCH COMPANIES, LLC,, 43 F. Supp. 3d 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 501.212(1). . . .

STATE v. BEACH BLVD AUTOMOTIVE, INC. a a O. Sr., 139 So. 3d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 501.212(4)(a), (d), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . Florida courts resolve questions about the applicability of section 501.212(4) by looking to the activity . . . Section 501.212(4) exempts from FDUTPA “[a]ny person or activity regulated under laws administered” by . . . act of selling credit life and credit disability insurance is not exempted from FDUTPA under section 501.212 . . . insurance for purposes of the Florida Insurance Code and that, as a result, the exemptions in section 501.212 . . .

GREENFIELD, v. YUCATAN FOODS, L. P., 18 F. Supp. 3d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 501.212(1) (FDUTPA’s “safe harbor” provision). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PHYSICIANS GROUP OF SARASOTA, L. L. C. L. L. C. a DB W. S. a W. S., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Section 501.212(4)(a), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny person or activity regulated under laws administered . . .

In SONY GAMING NETWORKS AND CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION, 996 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . § 501.212(3); In re Crown Auto Dealerships, Inc., 187 B.R. 1009, 1018 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1995) (holding . . .

J. DEGUTIS, v. FINANCIAL FREEDOM, LLC LLC,, 978 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(1). . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(c) ("This part does not apply to ... . . .

COMBE, v. FLOCAR INVESTMENT GROUP CORP., 977 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(3)). None of these circumstances are present in this case. . . .

In HORIZON ORGANIC MILK PLUS DHA OMEGA- MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICE LITIGATION, 955 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(1); 815 Ill. Stat. 505/10b(1); Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. L.A. Cellular Tel. . . . Fla Stat. § 501.212(1). . . .

KRZYKWA, v. CAMPBELL SOUP CO. a, 946 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(1). . . . Stat. § 501.212(1) Defendant argues that, because of preemption and compliance with federal law, Plaintiffs . . . Stat. § 501.212(1). This statute states as follows: 501.212. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1). As set forth above, Plaintiffs claims are not preempted. . . .

F. NEGRETE, E. Ow, v. ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, B. v., 927 F. Supp. 2d 870 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(4); Zarrella v. Pac. Life Ins. Co., 755 F.Supp.2d 1218, 1226 (S.D.Fla.2010). . . .

KUENZIG, v. HORMEL FOODS CORP., 505 F. App'x 937 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 501.212(1). Defendants’ labels were specifically permitted by federal law. . . .

GUERRERO, v. TARGET CORPORATION,, 889 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 501.212(1). In Prohias v. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1)); see also Eirman v. Olde Disc. . . . Stat. § 501.212(1). . . .

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, v. O. E. WHEEL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, O. E. LLC, E., 868 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 501.212(1). . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PHYSICIANS INJURY CARE CENTER, INC., 427 F. App'x 714 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 501.212(4)(a), State Farm may not bring a FDUPTA claim. . . . The express language of Fla Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) creates a specific exemption from suit under FDUPTA . . . Stat. § 501.212(4)(a) does not apply. . . .

JOVINE, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. d b a Co. a d b a, 795 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 501.212(3). Plaintiff, therefore, has failed to state a claim for violation of the FDUTPA. III. . . .

ZARRELLA, a v. PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . FDUTPA § 501.212 states, “This part does not apply to ... (4) Any person or activity regulated under . . . Department of Insurance which are now administered by the Department of Financial Services,” FDUTPA § 501.212 . . .

SOVEREIGN BONDS EXCHANGE LLC, v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY,, 899 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Stat. 501.212(4)(c); see also Bankers Trust Co. v. . . .

TAYLOR v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC,, 738 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (N.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 501.212(1) (stating that FDUTPA does not apply to an “act or practice required or specifically permitted . . .

DORESTIN K. v. HOLLYWOOD IMPORTS, INC. a d b a, 45 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 501.212(3), Fla. Stat. (2008). FDUTPA does not define “actual damages.” Rollins, Inc. v. . . .

J. LARACH v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL AMERICAS LIMITED, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . that Defendants are liable under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), § 501.212 . . . See § 501.212(4)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. RECOVERY PERFORMANCE MARINE, LLC d b a s, 38 So. 3d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 501.212(3), Florida Statutes (2009), further provides that the act does not apply to “a claim . . . Therefore, in that case, the “property that is the subject of the consumer transaction,” § 501.212(3) . . .

FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. FEO,, 24 So. 3d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 501.212(5), Florida Statutes (2009), creates a specific exception from suit under that Act for . . .

TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, v. MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, LLC a k a H. W., 672 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(1). . . .

SEWELL, v. D ALESSANDRO WOODYARD, INC. a D LLC, a K. LLC, a a I, LLC, a D A., 655 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . that plaintiffs’ FDUTPA claims should be dismissed because the claims are statutorily precluded by § 501.212 . . . Stat. § 501.212(6). Defendants claim that the statutory exclusion applies to them. . . . or registered pursuant to chapter 475,” as required to invoke the statutory exemption set forth in § 501.212 . . .

ANTOINE, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 662 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(4)(d), the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Practices Act does not apply to insurance companies . . .

H. CRICHTON, Jr. v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 576 F.3d 392 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(4) (West 2006) (“This part does not apply to ... (4) [a]ny person or activity regulated under . . .

FOJTASEK, v. NCL BAHAMAS LTD., 613 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(3); see also Schauer v. . . . Slat. § 501.212(3)). . . .

CABAN, v. J. P. MORGAN CHASE CO., 606 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(4)). . . .

FIELDS, v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 751 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 501.212(3X2008). In his memorandum, Plaintiff does not address the merits of this count. . . .

EXTRAORDINARY TITLE SERVICES, LLC, v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY FPL, 1 So. 3d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . challenges regarding rates and charges that a public utility imposes on customers; and pursuant to section 501.212 . . . exclusive jurisdiction over matters regarding rates of public utilities; and (3) pursuant to section 501.212 . . . section 366.04(1), we find that the trial court also properly dismissed Count I pursuant to section 501.212 . . .

SCHAUER, v. MORSE OPERATIONS, INC. d b a Ed, 5 So. 3d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . FDUTPA section 501.211(2), Florida Statutes (1999), a consumer may recover “actual damages” but section 501.212 . . . Based on sections 501.212(8) and 501.203(8) and (9), this court and other courts have held that section . . .

SUNDANCE APARTMENTS I, INC. a v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a L. P. a N. A. a, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . regarding GECC’s involvement to sustain a cause of action, and because the claim is barred by Section 501.212 . . . Section 501.212(7)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that the FDUT-PA does not apply to “[clauses of action . . . that Sun-dance’s claim falls squarely within the ambit of the FDUTPA exemption set forth in Section 501.212 . . . Stat. § 501.212(7)(a) (emphasis added). . . . Section 501.212(7)(a) requires that the written contract expressly provide for the process of resolution . . .

V. PROHIAS, v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L. P., 958 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 501.212(1), because the promotional and advertising activity attacked in the Complaint is supported . . .

PROHIAS, v. PFIZER, INC., 490 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 501.212(1)); see also Eirman v. Olde Disc. . . .

BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, v. BASCIANO,, 960 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 501.212(4), Fla. Stat. (2004). While recognizing that exemption, Mr. . . . Basciano contends that Lennar is not a bank protected by section 501.212(4), and, thus, falls within . . .

SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. a v. Y. GALURA, 961 So. 2d 961 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 501.212(4), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that FDUTPA does not apply to “[a]ny person or . . . Section 501.212(4) has since been amended to refer to laws administered by the Depart-men! . . .

STATE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, v. COMMERCE COMMERCIAL LEASING, LLC, IFC LLC,, 946 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 501.212, Florida Statutes, provides: This part does not apply to: (4) Any person or activity . . . Section 501.212(1), Florida Statutes, exempts from liability acts or practices “required or specifically . . .

GORRAN, v. ATKINS NUTRITIONALS, INC. D. Co- C. M. D., 464 F. Supp. 2d 315 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . . § 501.212(3); T.W.M. v. Am. Med. Sys., Inc., 886 F.Supp. 842, 844 (N.D.Fla.1995). 2. . . . Stat. § 501.212(3); see, e.g., T.W.M., 886 F.Supp. at 844 (dismissing FDUTPA claim premised on bodily . . .

WILLIAMS, v. J. EDELMAN P. A. a a P. A. a, 408 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 501.212(3). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. d b a a v., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 501.212(1)); see also Eirman v. Olde Disc. . . .

PNR, INC. v. BEACON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., 842 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2003)

. . . attorney’s fees in “any civil litigation resulting from an act or practice involving a violation”); 501.212 . . .

TV INC. v. STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 794 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . “Basil Basset Bingo” promotional game, 3B TV had committed an unfair act or practice under section 501.212 . . . its game was a valid game promotion and hence cannot constitute an unfair act or practice, section 501.212 . . . does not apply to an “act or practice required or specifically permitted by federal or state law.” § 501.212 . . . rules of United States Securities & Exchange Commission, thus DUTPA is inapplicable pursuant to section 501.212 . . . constituted a bingo game under section 849.0931, section 849.094 will offer 3B TV no protection under section 501.212 . . .

G. PETITT v. CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC., 153 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . . §§ 501.211(2), 501.212(3). . . . Stat. § 501.212(3). . . .

E. EIRMAN, v. OLDE DISCOUNT CORPORATION,, 697 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 501.212(1) exempts from its coverage “an act or practice required or specifically permitted by . . . Section 501.212(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

L. DELGADO L. v. J. W. COURTESY PONTIAC GMC- TRUCK, INC., 693 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 501.212(3). . . . 501.204); § 11, at 212 (amending § 501.2105); § 12, at 212 (amending § 501.211); § 13, at 212 (amending § 501.212 . . .

W. S. BADCOCK CORPORATION, a v. A. MYERS a, 696 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . insurance; (2) the DUTPA does not apply to activity regulated by the Department of Insurance, see § 501.212 . . . The parties or activities excluded from operation of the act are set forth in section 501.212, Florida . . . The Georgia and Louisiana cases cited by Badcock in support of its contention that section 501.212 exempts . . .

T. W. M. S. M. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., 886 F. Supp. 842 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . for damage to property other than the property that is the subject of the consumer transaction” [§ 501.212 . . .

NATIONAL ALCOHOLISM PROGRAMS COOPER CITY, FLORIDA, INC. a d b a v. PALM SPRINGS HOSPITAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN a, 825 F. Supp. 299 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 501.212(5). . . .

KLINGER a k a Ed v. WEEKLY WORLD NEWS, INC., 747 F. Supp. 1477 (S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 501.212(3) prevents the plaintiff from alleging a violation of the Act. . . . Section 501.212(3) states that the Act does not apply to: A claim for personal injury or death or a claim . . . First, nothing in the language of § 501.212(3) appears to prevent a plaintiff from seeking an injunction . . . As a result, § 501.212(3) would not preclude the plaintiff from obtaining his relief because that section . . . Fla.Stat. § 501.212(3) (emphasis added). . . .

BRYANT HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CORP. INC. v. CARRIER CORPORATION,, 597 F. Supp. 1045 (S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 501.212(3), and, this Court further recognized that Florida Courts have strictly construed the definition . . .

ROLLINS, INC. v. HELLER, 454 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 501.212(3). . . .

IC INDUSTRIES, v. I. C. INDUSTRIES,, 595 F. Supp. 340 (M.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . See §§ 501.212(3) and 501.203(1), Fla.Stat. 1983. Therefore, it is ORDERED: 1. . . .

CITY OF GAINESVILLE Ft. St. v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY,, 488 F. Supp. 1258 (S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . . § 501.212 provides: This part does not apply to: (5) Any person or activity regulated under laws administered . . . by the Florida Public Service Commission The Cities respond that the exemption in Section 501.212 is . . .

L. MARSHALL, M. v. W L ENTERPRISES CORPORATION d b a, 360 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . contended below however that it could not be liable for appellants’ attorney’s fees because Section 501.212 . . .