The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . CLAIMS A MORTGAGE INTEREST OF APPROXIMATELY $134,000; DISPUTED BY DEBTORS AS INVALID UNDER MINN STAT.507.04 . . . The Debtors recite that the mortgage instrument “is invalid pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec. 507.04 . . .
. . . King, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.04 at 507-36 (1996). . . .
. . . sales representatives are entitled to the same priority as employee wages. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 507.04 . . . their employment by the bankruptcy, would be in need of such protection.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 507.04 . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, P. 507.04[7] (15th ed.1995), relied on by the Doe court. . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.04[7] (15th ed. 1995) (“The language of this new priority [§ 507(a . . .
. . . King, ed., Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.04[5] n. 48 (1994). . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][h]. . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][h]. . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][h], These differences have been readily recognized in other . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][h]. . . .
. . . See generally 3 Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04, (Lawrence P. King ed., 15th ed. 1992). . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][b], at 507-36 (15th ed. 1992). . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][b], at 507-36 (15th ed. 1992). . . .
. . . responsible for withholding from the wages of employees and paying to the Treasury. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy 507.04 . . .
. . . (Collier on Bankruptcy, par. 507.04(e) (1991).) . . . Collier on Bankruptcy, par. 507.04(h) (1991). . . .
. . . (Emphasis supplied) 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY II 507.04[d] p. 507-24-25 (15th ed. 1990). . . .
. . . liquidating, to conduct the business of the debtor after the order for relief.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.04 . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.04[7][e], at 507-40 (15th ed. 1991). . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.04[7][e], at 507-40 (15th ed. 1991). . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy 11 507.04[1] (L.King ed. 1990); see also In re Wetmore, 117 B.R. 201 (Bankr.W.D.Pa . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[1] (L.King ed. 1990); see also In re Wetmore, 117 B.R. 201 (Bankr.W.D.Pa . . .
. . . See also § Collier on Bankruptcy, 507.04 (15th ed. (1989)). . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 507.04, 507-43 (11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7)(C). . . .
. . . § 507(b); In re Center Wholesale, Inc., 759 F.2d 1440, 1451 (9th Cir.1985); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 . . .
. . . investigate their employer’s creditworthiness before accepting employment. 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, 11 507.04 . . .
. . . Ohio 1982); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 at 507-33 (15th ed. 1988). . . .
. . . As recognized by COLLIERS, id. at II 507.04[l][b] and by this Court in In re American Resources Management . . .
. . . See, 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, para. 507.04[7][h], In re Compton Corp., 40 B.R. 875 (Bankr.N.D.Texas . . .
. . . provisions found in the original House bill and the Senate amendment.” 3 Collier On Bankruptcy at If 507.04 . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th Ed.1986) at 507.04[2]. . . .
. . . but rather are subordinated in order of payment under section 726(a)(4). 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[7][b] (15th ed. 1985). . . .
. . . liquidating, to conduct the business of the debtor after the order for relief.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 . . .
. . . (9th Cir.1949); In re Kinney Aluminum Co., 78 F.Supp. 565 (S.D.Cal.1948); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 . . .
. . . pecuniary loss, subparagraph (G) states the same principle in the affirmative. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.04 . . .
. . . . & Admin.News 1978, p. 5787; Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[5] (15th ed. 1984). . . .
. . . liquidating, to conduct the business of the debtor after the order for relief.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, II 507.04 . . .
. . . liquidating, to conduct the business of the debtor after the order for relief.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 11 507.04 . . .
. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04 (15th Edition 1984). . . .
. . . .; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, Section 507.04 (15th ed. 1982). . . .
. . . As described in King, Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th ed., ¶ 507.04[5], the priority reflected the solicitude . . .
. . . (Footnotes omitted, quoted in 3 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶507.04[5] pp. 507-41 — 507-42 (Fifteenth Ed.1982 . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[6] (15th ed. Supp.1982). . . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 507.04[6] (15th ed. Supp.1982). . . . .
. . . (7th Cir.1940), such benefits would be entitled to highest priority, ef. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.04 . . .
. . . (7th Cir.1940), such benefits would be entitled to highest priority, cf. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.04 . . .
. . . forms of employee compensation that is [sic] not in the form of wages.’ ” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 507.04 . . .
. . . . § 507.04(3). . . .
. . . South-West received for the stock $5,-507.04 in cash, the Addison notes in the amount of $30,000 plus . . .